ABSTRACT
Today, the restricted data type domains of the relational model affect Information Systems design. We claim another approach where the Information System designers would be able to portray directly the real world in a database model that provides more powerful and composite data types, as those of the real world. However, more powerful databases models need the introduction of data query and manipulation languages that reflect the features of the new composite data types. We introduce such a language and also reveal a direct consequence, which is the introduction of higher database design levels.
- Worboys, M., Hearnshaw, H., and Maguire, D. 1990. Object-Oriented Data Modelling for Spatial Databases. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 4, 4, 369--383.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pavković, N., Štorga, M., and Pavlić, D. 2001. Two Examples of Database Structures in Management of Engineering Data. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering (Bologna, 2000). ADM-Associazione Nazionale Disegno di Macchine, 89--90.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. B. 1996. Generic data modeling for clinical repositories. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 3, 5, 328--339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson S. B., and Chatziantoniou D. 1999. Extended SQL for manipulating clinical warehouse data. In proceedings of American Medical Informatics Association Symposium. AMIA 1999, 819--823.Google Scholar
- Nadkarni P. M. 2000. Clinical Patient Record Systems Architecture: An Overview. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 46, 3, 199--204.Google Scholar
- Nadkarni P. 2002. An introduction to entity-attribute-value design for generic clinical study data management systems. Presentation in National GCRC Meeting (Baltimore, MD, April 13, 2002).Google Scholar
- Anhøj, J. 2003. Generic Design of Web-Based Clinical Databases. Journal Medical Internet Research 4. http://www.jmir.org/2003/4/e27/Google Scholar
- Yannakoudakis E. J., Tsionos C. X., and Kapetis C. A. 1999. A new framework for dynamically evolving database environments. Journal of Documentation 55, 2, 144--158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yannakoudakis E. J., and Diamantis I. K. 2001. Further improvements of the Framework for Dynamic Evolving of Database environments. In Proceeding of the 5th Hellenic -- European Conference on Computer Mathematics and its Applications (Athens, Greece, 2001).Google Scholar
- Schek H. J., Pistor P. 1982. Data Structures for an Integrated Data Base Management and Information Retrieval System. In proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Very Large DataBases. VLDB 1982, 197--207. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fischer P. C., and Van Gucht D. 1985. Determining when a Structure is a Nested Relation. In proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Very Large DataBases. VLDB 1985, 171--180. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elmasri R., and Navathe, S. 2000. Fundamentals of Database Systems, 3rd Edition, Addison Wesley Publishing Company. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karanikolas, N. N., Nitsiou, M., Yannakoudakis, E. J., and Skourlas, C. 2007. CUDL language semantics, liven up the FDB data model. In Proceedings of Eleventh East-European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (Varna, Bulgaria, September 29 - October 03, 2007). ADBIS 2007 local proceedings, 1--16.Google Scholar
- Karanikolas, N. N., Nitsiou, M. and Yannakoudakis, E. J. 2008. CUDL Language Semantics: Authority Links. In Proceedings of the Twelfth East-European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (Pori, Finland, September 5--9, 2008). ADBIS 2008, 123--139.Google Scholar
- Karanikolas, N. N., Nitsiou, M., Yannakoudakis, E. J., and Skourlas, C. 2009. CUDL Language Semantics: Updating Data. Journal of Systems and Software 82, 6, 947--962. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Conceptual universal database language: literature review and the future of database design
Recommendations
Conceptual and Database Modelling of Graph Databases
IDEAS '16: Proceedings of the 20th International Database Engineering & Applications SymposiumComparing graph databases with traditional, e.g., relational databases, some important database features are often missing there. Particularly, a graph database schema including integrity constraints is not explicitly defined, also a conceptual ...
Conceptual Universal Database Language: Moving Up the Database Design Levels
ADBIS '09: Proceedings of the 13th East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information SystemsToday, the simplicity of the relational model types affects Information Systems design. We favor another approach where the Information System designers would be able to portray directly the real world in a database model that provides more powerful and ...
Object Deputy Database Language
C5 '06: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through ComputingObject deputy model can provide more flexibility than traditional object-oriented data model. Based on it, we have developed a database management system called TOTEM. In this paper, we introduce the object deputy database languages including object ...
Comments