skip to main content
10.1145/1555619.1555627acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdesristConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using the metaphysics of quality to define design science

Published:07 May 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Design has evolved from a craft into an academic discipline, but it still falls short on defining its own science. I review previous approaches to Design Science and conclude that the subject-object dualism is the one of the main obstacles. I then apply the Metaphysics of Quality to overcome the dualism and propose Quality as the phenomenon of Design Science. Next, I propose to utilize the analysis of interaction effects as a mean to investigate Quality. Last, I recommend steps we can take to mature this new Design Science and strategies how we can gain the acknowledgement of the other sciences.

References

  1. Davis, M. Why Do We Need Doctoral Study in Design? International Journal of Design, 2, 3 2008), 71--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartneck, C. What Is Good? - A Comparison Between The Quality Criteria Used In Design And Science. ACM, City, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. March, S. T. and Smith, G. F. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15, 4 1995), 251--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Simon, H. A. The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hubka, V. and Eder, W. E. Design science: introduction to needs, scope and organization of engineering design knowledge. Springer, Berlin; New York, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cross, N. Science and design methodology: A review. Research in Engineering Design, 5, 2 1993), 63--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A. and Kihlstrom, J. F. Intuition, incubation, and insight: implicit cognition in problem solving. Oxford University Press, City, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Feist, G. The affective consequences of artistic and scientific problem solving. Cognition and emotion, 8(1994 1994), 489--502.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Alexander, C. Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Vincenti, W. G. What engineers know and how they know it: analytical studies from aeronautical history. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pitt, J., C. What Engineers Know. Techne, 5, 3 2001), 17--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, J. M. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: Psychology as a Science of Design. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 1 1997), 61--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Descartes, R. Meditations on first philosophy. Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Descartes, R. Principia Philosophiae. Danielem Elzevirium, Amsterdam, 1644.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dreyfus, H. L. What computers can't do: the limits of artificial intelligence. Harper & Row, New York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Blackmore, S. J. The meme machine. Oxford University Press, Oxford {England}; New York, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Basalla, G. Man and Machine. Science, 1871975), 248--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J. and Ram, S. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 1 2004), #4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Damasio, A. R. Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Quill, New York, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pirsig, R. M. Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance: an inquiry into values. Morrow, New York, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pirsig, R. M. Lila: an inquiry into morals. Bantam Books, New York, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Charlton, B., G. A Philosophical Novel: Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Rober M. Pirsig. Durham University Journal, 841992), 111--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. McWatt, A. An Introduction to Robert Pirsig's Metaphysics of Quality. Ph.D., University of Liverpool, Liverpool, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kant, I., Pluhar, W. S. and Kitcher, P. Critique of pure reason. Hackett Pub. Co., Indianapolis, Ind., 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Allis, U. Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance. Critical Quarterly, 201978), 34--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pirsig, R. M. Subjects, Objects, Data & Values. City, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Poincare, H. and Maitland, F. Science and method. Thoemmes Press, Bristol, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Feyerabend, P. K. Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Humanities Press, London, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Roozenburg, N. J. M. and Eekels, J. Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Smithson, M. Statistics with confidence. Sage Publications, London, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. González, A. B. d. and Cox, D. R. Interpretation of interaction: A review. Annals of Applied Statistics, 1, 2 2007), 371--385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kremers, E., Urdang, G. and Sonnedecker, G. Kremers and Urdang's History of Pharmacy. American Institute of the History of Pharmac, Madison, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using the metaphysics of quality to define design science

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      DESRIST '09: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology
      May 2009
      288 pages
      ISBN:9781605584089
      DOI:10.1145/1555619

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader