skip to main content
10.1145/1577222.1577238acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesqshineConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quality-of-service provisioning via stochastic path selection under Weibullian link delays

Published:14 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study the problem of finding the most likely path satisfying a requested additive Quality-of-Service (QoS) value, such as delay. The link metrics are defined as random variables following Weibull probability distributions as empirically reported in [13] and analytically derived in [12]. The problem of finding the most likely path is NP-Hard [24]. Our approach involves reducing the complicated probability convolutions necessary to calculate the most probable path that satisfies a requested delay value. With the reduction of the objective function, an extended Bellman-Ford algorithm is devised to solve the problem. The resulting approach have the same complexity as the standard Bellman-Ford algorithm. Our reduced objective function only needs the location parameter of the Weibull distributions, hence avoiding the complexity of inferring the shape and scale parameters. We evaluate the performance of our approach by simulations and conclude with possible extensions of our work.

References

  1. Network simulator - ns - 2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. K. Ahuja, T. Magnanti, and J. Orlin. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Prentice Hall, First edition, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. ATM Forum. Private Network-to-Network Interface Specification version 1.1. ftp://ftp.atmforum.com/pub/approved-specs/af-pnni-0055.002.pdf, April 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Choi, S. Moon, Z. Zhang, K. Papagiannaki and C. Diot. Analysis of point-to-point packet delay in an operational network. IEEE INFOCOM 2004 Hong Kong, pages 1797--1807, March 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A.-L. Barabasi and R. Albert. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science, 286(5439):509--512, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. BRITE: Boston University Representative Internet Topology Generator.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Chen and K. Nahrstedt. An Overview of Quality of Service Routing for Next-Generation High-Speed Networks: Problems and Solutions. IEEE Network Magazine, pages 64--79, November/December 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Frank. Shortest paths in probabilistic graphs. Operations Research, 17:583--599, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Apostolopoulos, R. Guerin, S. Kamat and S. Tripathi. Improving QoS routing performance under inaccurate link state information. Proceedings of the 16th International Teletraffic Congress ITC'16, Edinburgh, UK, June 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, January 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Ghosh and R. Acharya. A probabilistic scheme for hierarchical qos routing. IEEE ICON, pages 416--421, October 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. I. Norros. On the use of fractional Brownian motion in the theory of connectionless networks. IEEE JSAC, 13(6):953--962, August 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Papagiannaki, S. Moon, C. Fraleigh, P. Thiran, C. Diot. Measurement and analysis of single-hop delay on an IP backbone network. IEEE JSAC, 21(6):908--921, August 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Kleinberg, Y. Rabani, and É. Tardos. Allocating bandwidth for bursty connections. In STOC '97 (El Paso, TX), pages 664--673. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Korkmaz and M. Krunz. Bandwidth-delay constrained path selection under inaccurate state information. IEEE/ACM ToN, 11(3):384--398, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. S. Lam. Back to the future part 4: the internet. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 35(1):3--12, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. W. E. Leland, M. S. Taqqu, W. Willinger, and D. V. Wilson. On the self-similar nature of ethernet traffic. IEEE/ACM ToN, 2(1):1--15, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. H. Lorenz and A. Orda. Qos routing in networks with uncertain parameters. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 6(6):768--778, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Medina, A. Lakhina, I. Matta, and J. Byers. BRITE: Universal topology generation from a user's perspective. Technical Report 2001--003, 1 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. P. V. Mieghem, F. Kuipers, T. Korkmaz, M. Krunz, M. Curado, E. Monteiro, X. Masip-Bruin, J. Sole-Pareta, and S. Sanchez-Lopez. Quality of Service Routing. Chapter 3 in Quality of Future Internet Services, EU-COST 263 Final Report, edited by Smirnov et al. in Springer LNCS 2856, pp. 80--117, December 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Moy. Open Shortest Path First Version 2 (OSPFv2). Request for Comments 2328, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2328.txt, April 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Paul Embrechts, Claudia Kluppelberg and Thomas Mikosch. Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Springer-Verlag, July 1997. (p. 51). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. Guerin and A. Orda. QoS Routing in Networks with Inaccurate Information. IEEE INFOCOM '97 Kobe, Japan, pages 92--100, April 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. R. Guerin and A. Orda. QoS Routing in Networks with Inaccurate Information: Theory and Algorithms. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 7(3), June 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Y. Rekhter and T. Li. A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4). Request for Comments (RFC 1771), March 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Chen and K. Nahrstedt. Distributed QoS Routing with Imprecise State Information. ICCCN, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Shaikh, J. Rexford, and K. G. Shin. Evaluating the impact of stale link state on quality-of-service routing. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 9(2):162--176, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. Uludag, K. Lui, K. Nahrstedt, and G. Brewster. Analysis of Topology aggregation Techniques for QoS Routing. to appear in ACM Computing Surveys, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. Uludag, K.-S. Lui, and Z. E. Uludag. Probabilistic Path Selection under Inaccuracy via Augmented Shortest Path Algorithms. In IEEE Globecom 2006, San Francisco, CA, November 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. V. P. Chistyakov. A Theorem on sums of independent positive random variables and its applications to branching randon processes. Theory of Probability and its applications, 9(1):640--648, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. B. M. Waxman. Routing of multipoint connections. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 6(9):1617--1622, December 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. L. Xiao, K.-S. Lui, J. Wang, and K. Nahrstedt. QoS Extension to BGP. Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP 2002), Paris, France, November 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. L. Xiao, J. Wang, K.-S. Lui, and K. Nahrstedt. Advertising interdomain QoS routing information. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 22(10):1949--1964, December 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Y. Xiao, K. Thulasiraman, and X. Guoliang. Approximation and heuristic algorithms for delay constrained path selection under inaccurate state information. In IEEE International Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, QSHINE 2004, pages 130--137, Dallas, TX, October 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. O. Younis and S. Fahmy. Constraint-based routing in the internet: Basic principles and recent research. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 5(1), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. X. Yuan and G. Yang. Empirical Probability Based QoS Routing. In IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2003, pages 1713--1717, Anchorage, Alaska, May 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. X. Yuan, W. Zheng, and S. Ding. A comparative study of qos routing schemes that tolerate imprecise state information. In International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), pages 230--235, October 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Quality-of-service provisioning via stochastic path selection under Weibullian link delays

                      Recommendations

                      Comments

                      Login options

                      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                      Sign in
                      • Published in

                        cover image ACM Other conferences
                        QSHINE '07: The Fourth International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness & Workshops
                        August 2007
                        337 pages
                        ISBN:9781595937568
                        DOI:10.1145/1577222

                        Copyright © 2007 ACM

                        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                        Publisher

                        Association for Computing Machinery

                        New York, NY, United States

                        Publication History

                        • Published: 14 August 2007

                        Permissions

                        Request permissions about this article.

                        Request Permissions

                        Check for updates

                        Qualifiers

                        • research-article

                      PDF Format

                      View or Download as a PDF file.

                      PDF

                      eReader

                      View online with eReader.

                      eReader