Benjamin G. Shaw
ABSTRACT
Design in many settings is an inherently collective and creative undertaking, with phenomena of emergence at the heart of the activity. Cognitive accounts of emergence in the context of design have not taken its collective nature into account. At the same time accounts of collective emergence do not recognize certain salient attributes of design, including the importance of visual thinking and various media for external representation. With reference to two distinct theories of emergence, Oxman's account of design emergence in terms of visual cognition, and Sawyer's account of collaborative emergence in conversation and performance, this paper reports results from a study of a high-performing, technologically mediated concurrent design practice. Participant observation, interviews, and video interaction analysis were used to render the creative process of engineering design in fine-grained detail. The resulting insights support aspects of both theories in that creative activity appears to proceed substantially through modalities of visual cognition, while collaborative products are arrived at through an essentially collective process involving multiple participants and unpredictable developments. The combined view presents a richer picture than either theory alone.
- Bucciarelli, L. (1994). Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bucciarelli, L. (1988). "An Ethnographic Perspective on Engineering Design." Design Studies 9, 3. (July '88). 159--168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M.&Sawyer, R. K. (1995). "Creative Insight: The Social Dimension of a Solitary Moment." In Sternberg, R .J.&Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). The Nature of Insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Goldschmidt, G. (1995). "The Designer as a Team of One." Design Studies. 16( 2). (Apr. '95). 189--209.Google Scholar
- Goldschmidt, G. (1991). "The Dialectics of Sketching." Creativity Research Journal. 4: 123--143.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goldschmidt, G. and Weil, M. (1998). "Contents and Structure in Design Reasoning." Design Issues 14(3). (Aut. '98). 85--100.Google Scholar
- Grice, H. P. (1975). "Logic and Conversation." In Cole, P.&Morgan, J. (Eds.). Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- Kelley, T.&Littman, J. (2001). The Art of Innovation. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Kosslyn, S. (2005). "Mental Images and the Brain." Cognitive Neuropsychology. 22, 3/4. 333--347.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Mark, G. (2002). "Extreme Collaboration." Communications of the ACM. 45, 6. (June, 2002). 89--93. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minneman, S. L. (1991). The Social Construction of a Technical Reality: Empirical Studies of Group Engineering Design Practice. PhD dissertation. Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Owens, D. (2000). "Structure and Status in Design Teams: Implications for Design Management." Academic Review of the Design Management Journal, 1. 55--63.Google Scholar
- Oxman, R. (2002). "The Thinking Eye: Visual Recognition in Design Emergence". Design Studies, 23, 2. (2002). 135--164.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sawyer, R. K. (2003a). Improvised Dialogues: Emergence and Creativity in Conversation. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Sawyer, R. K. (2003b). Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Sawyer, R. K. (2002). "Emergence in Psychology: Lessons from the History of Non-Reductionist Science." Human Development. 45. 2--28.Google Scholar
- Shaw, B. (2007). More than the Sum of the Parts: Shared Representations in Collaborative Design Interaction. PhD. Dissertation. Royal College of Art, London.Google Scholar
- Stiny, G. (1994). "Shape Rules: Closure, Continuity and Emergence." Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21. 49--78Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A cognitive account of collective emergence in design
Recommendations
Emergence as a Feature of Practice-based Design Research
DIS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferencePractice-based design research is often emergent. Methods, tactics, goals and even topics can unfold and change as researchers adapt and learn in the course of their projects. This adaptability is one of the strengths of design as an approach to ...
Understanding complex cognitive systems: the role of space in the organisation of collaborative work
This paper aims to provide some insights about the role of space as computational resource in collaborative practices. Focusing on collaborative design activity within a consulting firm in the UK, this research employs ethnographically inspired methods ...
Emergence of creativity in IS development teams: A socio-technical systems perspective
AbstractDespite the crucial role of creativity in the dynamic and intricate practice of Information Systems Development (ISD), our understanding of its emergence in ISD teams is limited. Prior research has focused on isolated interventions into the ...
Highlights- Examines creativity in IS development via socio-technical component interactions.
- Advances a socio-technical perspective on emergent creativity in ISD teams.
- Reveals creativity emergence at a multinational banking software ...
Comments