skip to main content
10.1145/1640233.1640264acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reflections on craft: probing the creative process of everyday knitters

Published:26 October 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Crafters today blend age-old techniques such as weaving and pottery with new information and communication technologies such as podcasts, online instructions, and blogs. This intersection of tradition and modernity provides an interesting site for understanding the adoption of new technology. We present a qualitative study of seven knitters introduced to Spyn - a system that enables the association of digitally recorded messages with physical locations on knit fabric. We gave knitters Spyn in order to elicit their reflections on their craft practices and learn from their interactions with material, people, and technology. While creating artifacts for friends and loved ones, knitters expanded the creative and communicative potential of their craftwork: knitters envisioned travel journals in knitted potholders and sung lullabies in knitted hats. We describe how these unusual craft activities provide a useful lens onto contemporary technological appropriation.

References

  1. Atkinson P. (ed.). Do It Yourself: Democracy and Design, In Journal of Design History, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1--10, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Attfield, J. Wild Things. The Material Culture of Everyday Life. Berg, Oxford-New York, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bean, J., Rosner, D. Learning from IKEA Hacking: "I'm Not One to Decoupage a Tabletop and Call It a Day." In Proc. CHI EA '09, pp. 419--422, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Blauvelt, G., Wrensch, T., and Eisenberg, M. Integrating craft materials and computation. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creativity&Cognition. C&C '99. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 50--56, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bonanni, L., Parkes, A., and Ishii, H. Future craft: how digital media is transforming product design. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '08. ACM, New York, NY, pp.2553--2564, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Buechley, L., Elumeze, N., and Eisenberg, M. 2006. Electronic/computational textiles and children's crafts. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on interaction Design and Children. IDC '06. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 49--56, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Craft and Hobby Association, www.hobby.org/eduevents_teach.html (verified on July 28, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dormer, P. The language and practical philosophy of craft. In The Culture of Craft, P. Dormer (ed.). Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dormer P. The Meaning of Modern Design - Towards the Twenty-first Century. London: Thames and Hudson, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eglash, R. Appropriating Technology: An Introduction, in R. Eglash (ed.) Appropriating Technology, pp.vii--xxi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. EyeFi http://www.eye.fi/ (verified on July 28, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Forlizzi, J. How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of cleaning in the home.Proceedings of HRI 2007, ACM Press, 2007. Remaking the Way we Make Things. New York: North Point Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gell, A. Art and Agency. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hutchins, E. Material anchors for conceptual blends. In Journal of Pragmatics, 37, pp. 1555--1577, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., et al. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families, Proceedings of CHI 2003, ACM Press, 17--24, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Johnson, J. S., Hawley, J. Technology's impact on creative traditions: Pieceful co-existence in quilting. In Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 22(1/2), pp. 69--78, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Keane, W. Signs are Not the Garb of Meaning: On the Social Analysis of Material Things. In Materiality, D. Miller (ed.). Duke University Press, pp. 182--205, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Klemmer, S. R., Graham, J., Wolff, G. J., and Landay, J. A. 2003. Books with voices: paper transcripts as a physical interface to oral histories. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '03. ACM, New York, NY, 89--96, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Küchler, S. Technological Materiality: Beyond the Dualist Paradigm. In Journal of Theory, Culture&Society, 25, 101--120, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Levine, F. and Heimerl, C. Handmade Nation: The Rise of DIY, Art, Craft, and Design. Princeton Architectural Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Macdonald, A. L. No Idle Hands; The Social History of American Knitting. New York: Ballentine Books, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. McCullough, M. Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand, MIT Press, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Miller, D. Material Culture and Mass Consumption, New York: Blackwell, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Minahan, S.,&Cox, J. W. Stitch' n bitch - cyherferninism, a third place and the new materiality. Journal of Material Culture, 12(1), pp. 5--21, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Prigoda, E., McKenzie, P. J. Purls of wisdom: A collectivist study of human information behaviour in a public library knitting group. In Journal of Documentation, 63(1), pp.90--114, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Pye, D. The Nature and Art of Workmanship. Herbert Press, London, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Resnick, M., Berg, R., and Eisenberg, M. Beyond Black Boxes: Bringing Transparency and Aesthetics Back to Scientific Investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7--30, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Rosner, D. K., Ryokai, K. Spyn: Augmenting Knitting to Support Storytelling and Reflection. In. Proceedings of Ubicomp '08., pp.340--349, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Schofield-Tomschin, S. and Littrell, M. A. Textile handcraft guild participation: a conduit to successful aging. In Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 41--51, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sennett, R. The Craftsman. Yale University Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Silverstone, R., E. Hirsch and D. Morley. Information and Communication Technologies and the Moral Economy of the Household. In Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. Silverstone R. and Hirsch E. (eds), pp.115--31. London: Routledge, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Silverstone, R. and L. Haddon. Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life. In Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies. Mansell R. and Silverstone R. (eds). pp. 44--74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Stoller, D. Stich'nBitch: A Knitter's Handbook. New York: Workman Publishing, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Torrey, C., Churchill, E., McDonald, D. Learning How: The Search for Craft Knowledge on the Internet. In Proceedings of CHI'09: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: pp.1371--1381, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Torrey, C., D. W. McDonald, B. N. Schilit and S. Bly. How-To Pages: Informal Systems of Expertise Sharing. In Proc. Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work '07. Springer, pp. 391--410, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Turner-Rahman, G. Parallel Practices and the Dialectics of Open Creative Production. Journal of Design History.: 22(4), pp.371--386, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Wakkary, R., and Maestri, L. The resourcefulness of everyday design. In Proceedings of ACM Creativity and Cognition 2007, pp. 163--172. New York: ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yeh, R., Liao, C., Klemmer, S. R., Guimbretière, F., Lee, B., Kakaradov, B., Stamberger, J., Paepcke, A. ButterflyNet: A Mobile Capture and Access System for Field Biology Research. In the Proceedings of CHI 2006: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: pp. 571--80, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reflections on craft: probing the creative process of everyday knitters

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        C&C '09: Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition
        October 2009
        520 pages
        ISBN:9781605588650
        DOI:10.1145/1640233

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 October 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader