Roberta Hartley
- Aired, G., Oliu, W., Brusaw, C. The Professional Writer, A Guide for Adnmcerl T~,hnical Writing. New York, NY: St. Martin's Prt~, Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
- Asxterson, Ronald H., and Reynolds, Angus. Selectiveand Developing Media for Instruction, Third Edition. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992.Google Scholar
- Bradford, Annette Norris. "Co~tual Differences Between the Display Screen and the Printed Page." Technical Communication 31 (3), 1984, pp. 13 - 16.Google Scholar
- Gottleib, Raymond L., O.D., Ph.D. "Neu~psychology of Myopia." Courtesy of Claude D. Valenti, Optometric Vision Development Center, La Joila, CA.Google Scholar
- Horton, William. Designing & Writing Online Documentation, Help F~es to Hyperte~. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Horton, William. Illustrating Congmter Documentation, The Art of Presenting Information Graphically on Paper and Online. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hutchinson, Dr. R. Anthony. Computer Eye-Stress, How to Avoid It, How to Alleviate It. New York, NY: M. Evans and Company, Inc., 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahn, Howard D., O.D. "Video Display Terminals and Vision." Santa Ana, CA: Optometric Extension Program Foundation. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McVey, Gerald F. "Legibility in Film-based and Television Display Systems." Technical Communication 32 (4), 1985, pp. 21 - 28.Google Scholar
- Murch, Gerald M. "Using Color Effectively: Designing to Human Specifications." Technical Communication 32 (4), 1985.Google Scholar
- Quality ~mentation Process; Conducting and Interpreting User Surveys. Dayton, OH: National Cash Register Corporation, 1990.Google Scholar
- Trachtman, Joseph N., O.D. "Biofeedback of Accommodation to Reduce Functional Myopia: A Case Report." American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 55 (6), 1987, pp. 4~- 406.Google Scholar
- "Working With VDTs, The Human Interface." Daly City, CA: ~ Communications, 1984.Google Scholar
- Zook, Lola. "Working asa Communicator: Then and Now." The Editorial Eye, 14 (4), 1992, pp. 1 - 3.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Guidelines for multimedia usage
Recommendations
From usage to annotation: analysis of personal photo albums for semantic photo understanding
WSM '09: Proceedings of the first SIGMM workshop on Social mediaWith photo albums we aim to capture personal events such as weddings, vacations, and parties of family and friends. By arranging photo prints, captions and paper souvenirs such as tickets over the pages of a photo book we tell a story to capture and ...
Disinformation in Multimedia Annotation: Misleading Metadata Detection on YouTube
iV&L-MM '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM workshop on Vision and Language Integration Meets Multimedia FusionPopularity of online videos is increasing at a rapid rate. Not only the users can access these videos online, but they can also upload video content on platforms like YouTube and Myspace. These videos are indexed by user generated multimedia annotation, ...
Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems
Collaborative tagging describes the process by which many users add metadata in the form of keywords to shared content. Recently, collaborative tagging has grown in popularity on the web, on sites that allow users to tag bookmarks, photographs and other ...
Reviews
D. Charles Hair
A variety of guidelines are outlined for authors interested in developing multimedia presentations. The paper is clearly written, and gives some pointers that should be of value to authors who are not already familiar with work in the user interface field. The paper would have been of more value if it had included a more extensive reference list. For people with more user interface experience, little in the paper is new. A few aspects of the paper trouble me. One problem is that the author indicates that the points made in the paper are based on primary and secondary research, but it is not made clear which results are based on which kind of research. Another problem is that although the author indicates that research instruments and summaries can be obtained by writing to her, I would have preferred to find more discussion of those in the paper itself. Finally, at two points in the paper, the author gives lists of questions to be asked about potential multimedia projects, and asserts something to the effect that if a certain number of the questions (for example, five out of eight) are answered “yes, ” then a given conclusion can be reached. She should have supplied some justification for those assertions.
Access critical reviews of Computing literature here
Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.
Comments