skip to main content
review-article

Perspectives on developing and assessing professional values in computing

Published:18 January 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper discusses how to ensure that students attain professional values important to the workplace by integrating them into computing curricula. It describes a survey of the attitudes of students, faculty and professionals in computing towards the teaching and assessment of such values. The results show that these groups share a set of professional values, though students are less convinced of their importance in the work environment. There is broad consensus on the specific behaviors and attitudes reflective of these values to be developed in the curriculum. The groups differed in their opinions of whether these attitudes and behaviors could be workably assessed.

References

  1. ACM. 2001. The Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. Computing Curricula 2001 (CC2001): Computer Science, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ACM. 2008. Information Technology 2008: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree programs in Information Technology http://www.acm.org//education/curricula/IT2008%20Curriculum.pdf {last accessed July 2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. E., Johnson, D. G., Gotternbarn, D. and Perrolle, J. 1993. Using the new ACM code of Ethics in decision making. Communications of the ACM, 36, 2 1993, 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barros, J. and Garcia, L. 2007. The Bologna Process as a Motivator for Change http://www.seerc.org/ieeii2007/PDFs/p146--154.pdf last accessed July 2009. South East European Research Centre, Sheffield.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Benveniste, G. 1992. The politics of expertise. Glendessary Press, Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs, J.B. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment, Higher Education 32: 347--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. and Krathwohl, D. R. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain. Longmans, Green and Co Ltd, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Comptia, http://www.comptia.org; {last accessed July 20, 2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunlop, C. and Kling, R. 1991. Computerization and Controversy. Academic Press Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Finerman, A. 1975. Professionalism in the computing field. Communications of the ACM, 18, 1 1975, 4--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fuller, U. & Keim, B.. Should we assess our students' attitudes? Proceedings of the Seventh Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2007), Koli National Park, Finland, November 15-18, 200, Raymond Lister and Simon, Eds, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gay, A. Conference Presentation. http://www.sfia.org.uk/public/File/SFIA_Foundation/SFIA_Conference_08/Andrew_Gay.pdf {last accessed July 5,.2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gotterbarn, D., Miller, K. and Rogerson, S. 1997. Software Engineering Code of Ethics. Communications of the ACM, 40, 11 1997, 110--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Granger, M. J., Little, J. C., Adams, E. S., Bjorkman, C., Gotternarn, D., Juettner, D. D., Martin, C. D. and Young, F. H. 1997. Using IT to integrate Social and Ethical Issues into Computer Science and Information Systems Curriculum. Inroads 1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, S. P., and Bryant, V. C. 2008. Assessment of Professional Skills for Students in Computing and Engineering Programs. 2008 Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges, Mid-South Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Horning, J. 2007. Risks of Virtual Professionalism, Inside Risks. April 2007/Vol 30, No. 4, Communications of the ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. IBM. 2009. IBM UK Recruitment-Graduates-Opportunities-What we look for. http://www-05.ibm.com/employment/uk/graduates/opportunities/what-welook-for.html {last accessed July.7,.2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Illingworth, .S. 2004. Approaches to Ethics in Higher Education: Learning and Teaching Ethics across the Curriculum. Philosophical and Religious Studies Subject Centre, Leeds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Informatics Education Europe. 2008. Informatics Education Europe III. http://www.dsi.unive.it/IEEIII/ {last accessed July 20, 2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. International Professional Practice Partnership International Professional Practice Partnership. 2009. http://www.ipthree.org/ {last accessed July 15, 2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobs, P. 1998. IT: Trade or Profession. InfoWorld, June 29, 1998 1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula (2001). Computing Curricula 2001: Computer Science, ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonsen, A. R. and Toulmin, S. 1988. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kasper, G. M. 2009. Professionalizing the computing profession: a report on the IFIP TC 8 39th meeting of national representatives & WCC 2008. SIGMIS Database, 40, 1 2009), 8--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S. and Masia, B. B. 1964. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 2 Affective domain. McKay, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Little, J. C., Granger, M. J., Boyle, R., Gerhardt-Powals, J., Impagliazzo, J., Janik, C., Kubilus, N. J., Lippert, S. K., McCracken, W. M., Paliwoda, G. and Soja, P. 1999. Integrating Professionalism and Workplace Issues into the Computing and Information Technology Curriculum. Inroads, 31 (4) 106--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Maister, D. 1997. True Professionalism. The Free Press, New York NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, C. D., Huff, C., Gotterbarn D., Keith Miller, K. ImpactCS. http://www.seas.gwu.edu/~impactcs/ {last accessed July 28. 2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Neumann, P. G. 1992. Where to place trust. Communications of the ACM, 35, 10 1992), 138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Prior, M., Fairweather, N.B., Rogerson, S., & Dave, K. 2004 Is IT Ethical? The Institute for the Management of Information Systems http://www.imis.org.uk/about/codeofethics/Is%20IT%20Ethical%202004.pdf {last accessed July 28, 2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. QAAHE.2007. Computing: Subject Benchmark Statement http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/honours/computing.asp {last accessed July 28, 2009}. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, Gloucester, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramsden, P. Learning to Teach in Higher Education London & New York, Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Riedesel, C.P., Manley, E.D., Poser, S. & Deogun, J.S. 2009. A model academic ethics and integrity policy for computer science departments. Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 357--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Thompson, B. J. 2001. Global Aspects of Software Engineering Professionalism. Software Engineering Notes, 26, 6 2001), 40--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Thompson, B. J. 2001. Software Engineering Professionalism: Is there a global dimension to this? Proceedings of the ninth Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'02)2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Turner, J. 1991 Joint Summary of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force Report: Computing Curricula -1991. Communications of the ACM. June 1991/VoL34, No.6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. UNESCO. 1998. World Declaration on Higher Education for the Twenty-First Century: Vision and Action. UNESCO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. The University of Sydney. Policy Framework. http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/graduateattributes/policy_framework.pdf {last accessed July.7, 2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Whitbeck, C. 1998. Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Wolfson, J. 1990. A Conduct Code: An Ethics Code with Bite. Stanford: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. World Computer Congress. 2008. WCC Declaration on ICT Professionalism and Competences. http://www.ifip.org/images/stories/ifip/public/Announcements/wcc08-ict-p&c-declaration.pdf {last accessed July 20, 2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Perspectives on developing and assessing professional values in computing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader