skip to main content
10.1145/1719970.1719980acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Agent-assisted task management that reduces email overload

Published:07 February 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

RADAR is a multiagent system with a mixed-initiative user interface designed to help office workers cope with email overload. RADAR agents observe experts to learn models of their strategies and then use the models to assist other people who are working on similar tasks. The agents' assistance helps a person to transition from the normal email-centric workflow to a more efficient task-centric workflow. The Email Classifier learns to identify tasks contained within emails and then inspects new emails for similar tasks. A novel task-management user interface displays the found tasks in a to-do list, which has integrated support for performing the tasks. The Multitask Coordination Assistant learns a model of the order in which experts perform tasks and then suggests a schedule to other people who are working on similar tasks. A novel Progress Bar displays the suggested schedule of incomplete tasks as well as the completed tasks. A large evaluation demonstrated that novice users confronted with an email overload test performed significantly better (a 37% better overall score with a factor of four fewer errors) when assisted by the RADAR agents.

References

  1. Bellotti, V., Dalal, B., Good, N., Flynn, P., Bobrow, D.G. and Ducheneaut, N. What a To-Do: Studies of Task Management Towards the Design of a Personal Task List Manager. Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2004), 735--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bellotti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., Smith, I. and Grinter, R.E. Quality Versus Quantity: E-Mail-Centric Task Management and Its Relation With Overload. Human-Computer Interaction 20, 1/2 (2005), 89--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bellotti, V. and Thornton, J.D. Managing Activities with TV-ACTA: TaskVista and Activity-Centered Task Assistant. Proc. SIGIR Workshop on PIM, (2006), 8--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Conley, K. and Carpenter, J. Towel: Towards an Intelligent To-Do List. Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Interaction Challenges for Artificial Assistants, AAAI Press (2007), 26--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Corston-Oliver, S., Ringger, E., Gamon, M. and Campbell, R. Task-focused Summarization of Email. Proc. ACL Workshop on "Text Summarization Branches Out", Association for Computational Linguistics (2004), 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ducheneaut, N. and Bellotti, V. E-mail as Habitat: An Exploration of Embedded Personal Information Management. interactions 8, 5 (2001), 30--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fahlman, S.E. Marker-Passing Inference in the Scone Knowledge-Base System. Proc. KSEM, Springer (2006), 114--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Faulring, A., Mohnkern, K., Steinfeld, A. and Myers, B.A. The Design and Evaluation of User Interfaces for the RADAR Learning Personal Assistant. AI Magazine 30, 4 (2009), 74--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fink, E., Bardak, U., Rothrock, B. and Carbonell, J.G. Scheduling with Uncertain Resources: Collaboration with the User. Proc. IEEE SMC, IEEE Press (2006), 11--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Freed, M., Carbonell, J., Gordon, G., Hayes, J., Myers, B., Siewiorek, D., Smith, S., Steinfeld, A. and Tomasic, A. RADAR: A Personal Assistant that Learns to Reduce Email Overload. Proc. AAAI-08, AAAI Press (2008), 1287--1293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Garlan, D. and Schmerl, B. The RADAR Architecture for Personal Cognitive Assistance. IJSEKE 17, 2 (2007), 171--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gwizdka, J. TaskView: Design and Evaluation of a Task-based Email Interface. Proc. CASCON, IBM Press (2002), 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Horvitz, E. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. Proc. CHI, ACM Press (1999), 159--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A. and Hovel, D. Attention-Sensitive Alerting. Proc. UAI 1999, Morgan Kaufman (1999), 305--313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kumar, M., Das, D. and Rudnicky, A.I. Summarizing Non-textual Events with a 'Briefing' Focus. Proc. RIAO, Centre De Hautes Etudes Internationales D'Informatique Documentaire (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Myers, K., Berry, P., Blythe, J., Conley, K., Gervasio, M., McGuinness, D., Morley, D., Pfeffer, A., Pollack, M. and Tambe, M. An Intelligent Personal Assistant for Task and Time Management. AI Magazine 28, 2 (2007), 47--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nyberg, E., Riebling, E., Wang, R.C. and Frederking, R. Integrating a Natural Language Message Pre-Processor with UIMA. Proc. LREC Workshop on "Towards Enhanced Interoperability for Large HLT Systems: UIMA for NLP", (2008), 28--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Shneiderman, B. and Maes, P. Direct Manipulation vs. Interface Agents. interactions 4, 6 (1997), 42--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Steinfeld, A., Bennett, S.R., Cunningham, K., Lahut, M., Quinones, P.-A., Wexler, D., Siewiorek, D., Hayes, J., Cohen, P., Fitzgerald, J., Hansson, O., Pool, M. and Drummond, M. Evaluation of an Integrated Multi-Task Machine Learning System with Humans in the Loop. Proc. PerMIS, NIST (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Steinfeld, A., Quinones, P.-A., Zimmerman, J., Bennett, S.R. and Siewiorek, D. Survey Measures for Evaluation of Cognitive Assistants. Proc. PerMIS, NIST (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Stylos, J., Myers, B.A. and Faulring, A. Citrine: Providing Intelligent Copy and Paste. Proc. UIST, ACM Press (2004), 185--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Varakantham, P. and Smith, S. Linear Relaxation Techniques for Task Management in Uncertain Settings. Proc. ICAPS, AAAI Press (2008), 363--371.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Whittaker, S., Bellotti, V. and Gwizdka, J. Email in Personal Information Management. CACM 49, 1 (2006), 68--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Whittaker, S. and Sidner, C. Email Overload: Exploring Personal Information Management of Email Proc. CHI, ACM Press (1996), 276--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yang, Y., Yoo, S., Zhang, J. and Kisiel, B. Robustness of Adaptive Filtering Methods in a Cross-Benchmark Evaluation. Proc. SIGIR, ACM Press (2005), 98--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yang, Y., Zhang, J. and Kisiel, B. A Scalability Analysis of Classifiers in Text Categorization. Proc. SIGIR, ACM Press (2003), 96--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Zimmerman, J., Tomasic, A., Simmons, I., Hargraves, I., Mohnkern, K., Cornwell, J. and McGuire, R.M. VIO: A Mixed-initiative Approach to Learning and Automating Procedural Update Tasks. Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2007), 1445--1454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Agent-assisted task management that reduces email overload

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IUI '10: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
          February 2010
          460 pages
          ISBN:9781605585154
          DOI:10.1145/1719970

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 February 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader