skip to main content
10.1145/1719970.1720031acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Vocabulary navigation made easier

Published:07 February 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is challenging to search a dictionary consisting of thousands of entries in order to select appropriate words for building written communication. This is true both for people trying to communicate in a foreign language who have not developed a full vocabulary, for school children learning to write, for authors who wish to be more precise and expressive, and especially for people with lexical access disorders. We make vocabulary navigation and word finding easier by augmenting a basic vocabulary with links between words based on human judgments of semantic similarity. In this paper, we report the results from a user study evaluating how our system named ViVA performs compared to a widely used assistive vocabulary in which words are organized hierarchically into common categories.

References

  1. AssistiveWare. http://www.assistiveware.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Beukelman, D.R & Mirenda, P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Brooks Publishing Company, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd-Graber, J., Nikolova, S., Moffatt, K., Kin, K., Lee, J., Mackey, L., Tremaine, M., & Klawe, M. Participatory design with proxies: developing a desktop-PDA system to support people with aphasia. Proc. CHI '06, 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6):407--428, November 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fellbaum, C. A Semantic Network of English Verbs. In WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lingraphicare Inc. http://www.aphasia.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Moss, H. & Older, L. Birkbeck Word Association Norms. Psychology Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nikolova, S., Boyd-Graber, J. Fellbaum, C. & Cook, P. Better Vocabularies for Assistive Communication Aids: Connecting Terms using Semantic Networks and Untrained Annotators. In Proc. ASSETS'09, 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Patel, R., Pilato, S. & Roy, D. Beyond linear syntax: An image-orientation communication aid. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1(1):57--67, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Swinney, D. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, (18):645--659, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Vocabulary navigation made easier

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Mariana Damova

    The purpose of the reported research is to present a visual vocabulary for people with aphasia that models the speaker's mental lexicon and enables quick word finding. The paper is a good contribution to the field of assistive communication, as it describes and argues for an approach to facilitate vocabulary access in assistive vocabularies. The visual vocabulary developed for aphasia (ViVA) compensates for broken semantic links in the mental lexicon of people with aphasia "by organizing words in a dynamic semantic network." In this network, the connections between words reflect human judgments of semantic similarity. "Theories that explain how the human mind organizes words" are used to organize the words. The authors provide the following example: Spreading network activation models assume that presenting a prime stimulus word activates the corresponding representation in lexical memory and that this activation spreads to other related nodes. The implemented solution contains semantic networks that overlay a basic hierarchical vocabulary. The links between the words reflect associations based on a measure reflecting "how much one word brings to mind another word." The lexical database WordNet is used in the implementation. Nikolova et al. conduct an experiment that evaluates the efficiency of the method by comparing access to words with two vocabularies. The results show that it takes significantly less time to find a word using the ViVA vocabulary than using concept hierarchies. A post-experiment questionnaire reveals that "all participants agreed that having related words automatically suggested helped them find words faster" and that finding words with ViVA was less confusing than searching with a previously available hierarchical concept vocabulary. The main contribution of the paper is a method for assisting communication for people with lexical access impairments. This method can also aid foreign language learners. The paper should interest linguists and professionals in the field of assistive communication. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '10: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      February 2010
      460 pages
      ISBN:9781605585154
      DOI:10.1145/1719970

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 February 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader