The design of eco-feedback technology

ABSTRACT

Eco-feedback technology provides feedback on individual or group behaviors with a goal of reducing environmental impact. The history of eco-feedback extends back more than 40 years to the origins of environmental psychology. Despite its stated purpose, few HCI eco-feedback studies have attempted to measure behavior change. This leads to two overarching questions: (1) what can HCI learn from environmental psychology and (2) what role should HCI have in designing and evaluating eco-feedback technology? To help answer these questions, this paper conducts a comparative survey of eco-feedback technology, including 89 papers from environmental psychology and 44 papers from the HCI and UbiComp literature. We also provide an overview of predominant models of proenvironmental behaviors and a summary of key motivation techniques to promote this behavior.

References

1. Abrahamse, W., Wokje, A., Steg, L., Vlek, C., Rothengatter, T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. of Env.Psychology 25, 3(2005), 273--291.
2. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6 (1970), pp. 466--487.
3. Arroyo, E., Bonanni, L., Selker, T. Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink. Proc of CHI '05, ACM Press (2005), 631--639..
4. Bang, M., Gustafsson, A., Katzeff, C. Promoting new patterns in household energy consumption with pervasive learning games. Persuasive'07, 2007, 55--63.
5. Becker, L.J. Joint Effect of Feedback and Goal Setting on Performance: A Field Study of Residential Energy Conservation. J. of Applied Psychology 63. 4(1978), 428--433.
6. Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. Proc. CHI'07, (2007), 503--512.
7. Brewer, G. and Stern, P. (Eds) Decision Making for the Environment: Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities, 2005, CHDCG, National Research Council.
8. Cialdini, R.B. Kallgren, C.A. and Reno, R.R., A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and re-evaluation. Adv. in Experimental Social Psychology 24 (1991), 201--234.
9. Consolvo, S., et al. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. Proc. CHI'08, 2008, 1797--1806.
10. Congressional Budget Office, Effects of Gas Prices on Driving Behavior & Vehicle Markets, US Congress Report, Jan 08.
11. Costanzo, M., Archer, D., Aronson, E., Pettigrew, T. Energy conservation behavior: The difficult path from information to action. American Psychologist 41, 1986, 521--528.
12. Darby, S. Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption. Proc. Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting, 2000.
13. Dobson, J.K., & Griffin, J.D. (1992). Conservation effect of immediate electricity cost feedback on residential consumption behavior. Proc. of ACEEE 1992, 33--35.
14. Egan, C. How customers interpret and use comparative displays of their home energy use. Proc. European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1999. Panel III, 19.
15. Fischer, C. Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1, (2008), 79--104
16. Fitzpatrick, G., Smith, G. Technology-enabled feedback on domestic energy consumption: articulating a set of design concerns. Pervasive Computing 8, 1(2009), 37--44.
17. Fogg, B.J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 2003.
18. Fransson, N., & Garling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369--382.
19. Froehlich, J., Consolvo, S., et al. UbiGreen: Investigating a Mobile Tool for Tracking and Supporting Green Transportation Habits. Proc. CHI'09, 2009, 1042--1052.
20. Gardner, G.T. and Stern, P.C. The Short List: The Most Effective Actions US Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change. Environment. September/October 2008.
21. Geller, E.S., et al. A conceptual framework for developing and evaluating behavior change interventions for injury control. Health Education Research 5, 2(1990), 125--137.
22. Geller, E.S., Winett, R.A., & Everett, P.B. Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press, 1982.
23. Goldstein, N., Cialdini, R., Griskevicius, R. A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. J. of Consumer Research 35, (2008), 472--482.
24. Gonzales, M.H., Aronson, E. Using social cognition and persuasion to promote energy conservation: a quasi-experiment. J. of Applied Social Psychology 18, 12(1988), 1049--1066.
25. Gustafsson, A. and Gyllenswärd, M. The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. CHI EA '05, 2005, 1423--1426.
26. Haakana M., et al. The effect of feedback and focused advice on household energy consumption. Proc. ECEEE'97, 1997.
27. Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H., Tomera, A. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. J. of Environmental Education 18, 2(1986/87), 1--8.
28. Holmes, T.G. Eco-visualization: combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption. Proc. ACM Creativity and Cognition, 2007, 153--162.
29. Holstius, D., Kembel, J., Hurst, A., Wan, P., Forlizzi, J. Infotropism: living and robotic plants as interactive displays. Proc. DIS'04. DIS '04, 2004, 215--221.
30. Kim, T., Hong, H., Magerko, B. Coralog: use-aware visualization connecting human micro-activities to environmental change. Proc. CHI EA '09, 2009, 4303--4308.
31. Kappel, K. Grechenig, T. "show-me": water consumption at a glance to promote water conservation in the shower. Proc. Persuasive '09, 2009, 1--6.
32. Keirstead, J. Behavioural responses to photovoltaic systems in the UK domestic sector. Energy Policy 35 (2007), 4128--4141.
33. Kohlenberg, R., Phillips, T, Proctor, W. A behavioral analysis of peaking in residential electrical-energy consumers. J. Applied Behavior Analysis 9, 1(1976), 13--18.
34. Kollmus, A, Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? J. Environmental Education 8, 3(2002), 239--260.
35. Lester, J., Choudhury, T., Borriello, G. A practical approach to recognizing physical activities. Pervasive'06, 2006, 1--16.
36. Lin, J. Energy conservation investments: A comparison between China & the US. Energy Policy, 35 (2007), 916--924.
37. Locke, E. & Latham, G. (2002). Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation, a 35-Year Odyssey. American Psychologist 57, 9(2002), 705--717.
38. Mankoff, J., Matthews, D., Fussell, Susan, R. Johnson, M. Leveraging social networks to motivate individuals to reduce their ecological footprints. Proc. HICSS'07, 2007, 87--96.
39. McCalley, L. & Midden, C. Computer based systems in household appliances: The study of ecofeedback as a tool for increasing conservation behavior. Proc.APCHI, (1998), 344--349.
40. McCalley, L. & Midden, C. Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: the roles of goal-setting and social orientation. J. of Economic Psychology 23, (2002), 589--603.
41. Pallak, M.S., Cummings, W. Commitment and voluntary energy conservation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2, 1(1976), 27--30.
42. Paulos, E., Jenkins, T. Jetsam: exposing our everyday discarded objects. Demo Ubicomp'06, 2006, 2 pages.
43. Pierce, J., Odom, W., Blevis, E. Energy Aware Dwelling: A Critical Survey of Interaction Design for Eco-Visualizations. Proc. OZCHI '08, 2008.
44. Pousman, Z., Rouzati, H., Stasko, J. Imprint, a Community Visualization of Printer Data: Designing for Open-ended Engagement on Sustainability. Proc. CSCW'08, 4 pages.
45. Petersen, D., Steele, J., and Wilkerson, J. WattBot: a residential electricity monitoring and feedback system. CHI'09 EA'09, 2009, 2847--2852.
46. Prochaska J., DiClemente C. Toward a comprehensive model of change. In: Miller WR, Heather N, eds. Treating addictive behaviors: processes of change. NY: Plenum Press; 1986. 3--27.
47. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influence on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10 (pp. 221--279). New York: Academic Press.
48. Sexton, R.J., Johnson, N.B, Konakayama, A. Consumer response to continuous-display electricity-use monitors in a time-of-use pricing experiment. Journal of Consumer Research 14, 1(1987), 55--62.
49. Siero, F.W., Bakker, A.B., Dekker, G.B., van den Burg, T.C. Changing organizational energy consumption behavior through comparative feedback. J. of Environmental Psychology 16, (1996), 235--246.
50. Staats, H., Harland, P., Wilke, H. Effecting durable change: a team approach to improve environmental behavior in the household. Environment & Behavior 36, 3(2004), 341--367.
51. Stern, P.C Information, incentives, and proenvironmental consumer behavior. J.of Consumer Policy 22, 1999, 461--478.
52. Stern, P.C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Social Issues 56, 3(2000), 407--424.
53. Valente, T.W., Schuster, D.V. The public health perspective for communicating environmental issues. In Dietz, T., Stern, P.C., eds: New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures. National Academic Press, 2002.
54. Van Houwlingen, J.H. and Van Raaij, W. (1989). The Effect of Goal--Setting and Daily Electronic Feedback on In--Home Energy Use. J. of Consumer Research 16, 1 (1989), 98--105.
55. Wang, T. and Katzev, R. Group commitment and resource conservation: two field experiments on promoting recycling. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 20, 4(1990), 265--275.
56. Winett, R.A., et al. Effects of monetary rebates, feedback, and information on residential electricity conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology 63, 1(1978), 73--80.
57. Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J., Augustin, S. A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. CHI '08, (2008), 313--322.
58. Yates, S. and Aronson, E. A Social Psychological Perspective on Energy Conservation in Residential Buildings. Psychology in Action. 1983.
59. Yun, T. Investigating the impact of a minimalist in-home energy consumption display. CHI EA'09, 2009, 4417--442.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing