skip to main content
10.1145/1774088.1774235acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A new two level hierarchy structuring for node partitioning in ad hoc networks

Published:22 March 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

A big challenge in designing a distributed application is the partitioning which consists of optimizing the system component inter-communication. In this paper we introduce a new approach of Ad Hoc network group formation based on two level hierarchy structure: many groups with one leader per group at the first level and a super-leader for the whole network at the second one. We worked on the minimization of the communication between nodes by the choice of decent metrics in group formation as well as in leader and super-leader elections. Moreover the designed algorithm is validated by simulation results and then verified by model checking. In addition, a re-organization strategy and the principle of communication protocols will be presented.

References

  1. N. Benaouda, H. Guyennet. and A. Benaouda, Simulation d'un scénario de e-maintenance préventive utilisant les services web .NET., in IEEE SETIT'2005, electronic edition, abstract page 235, Tunis, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. N. Benaouda, H. Guyennet, A. Hammad, A/H Benaouda, M. Mostefai, Modélisation par les groupes d'un réseau sans fil Ad Hoc, Cip'2007, electronic edition, abstract page 108, Sétif, Algeria, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. S. Bouassida, I. Chrismen, O. Festor, Group key management, International Journal Of Network Security, IJNS, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Chamberlain, Graph partitioning algorithms for distributing workloads of parallel computations, Technical Report UW-CSE-98-10-03, University of Washington, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. M. Clarke, O. Grumberg and D. A PELED, Model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. J. Evans W. U. N. Butt: Load Balancing with Network Partitioning Using Host Groups, Parallel Computing, 20, 325--345, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. O. Fjallstrom, Algorithms for graph partitioning: A survey, Linkoping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science, 3(10), 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. R. Garey and D. S Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, W. H. Freeman Co., 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Guyennet, Jean-Christophe Lapayre: The Group Approach in Cooperative Work and in Load Balancing, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing Practices, Vol 2, Nř3, p285--297, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Hammad and H. Mountassir, Heuristics to verify LTL properties of hierarchical systems, in VECoS'2008, 2nd Int. Workshop on Verification and Evaluation of Computer and Communication Systems, eWiC - electronic Workshops in Computing, Leeds, UK, July 2008, British Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. Kettaf, A. Abouaissa, P. Lorenz, H. Guyennet, A Self Organizing Algorithm for Ad hoc Networks, 10th IFIP Int. Conference on Personal Wireless Communication, PWC05, pp115--124, Colmar, Aug 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Lehsaini, H. Guyennet, and M. Feham, CES Cluster-based Energy-efficient Scheme for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks, chapter in the book Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks II (Boston Springer), vol. 264, pp. 13--24, May 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. W. Massri, QoS requirements mapping in TDMA-based Wireless Sensor Networks, Ph.D. in Computers from the University Paul Sabatier (Toulouse 3), 2009, Toulouse, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. Mitton, Auto-organisation des réseaux sans fil Multi-sauts a grande échelle, Ph.D. in Computers and networks, 2006, Insa-Lyon, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. G. Raverdy:Gestion de Ressources et Répartition de charge dans les systèmes hétérogènes a Grande échelle, PHD Thesis, Paris VI, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. E. Rosti et al.: Robust Partitioning Policies of Multiprocessor Systems, Performance Evaluation North Holland, 19(2--3), 141--165, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. G. Vaughan: A Hierarchical Protocol for Decentralizing Information Dissemination in Distributed Systems, The Computer Journal, Vol. 38, 1, 57--70, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 2010
    2712 pages
    ISBN:9781605586397
    DOI:10.1145/1774088

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 March 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    SAC '10 Paper Acceptance Rate364of1,353submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader