skip to main content
10.1145/177424.177436acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Almost tight upper bounds for the single cell and zone problems in three dimensions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 June 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of bounding the combinatorial complexity of a single cell in an arrangement of n low-degree algebraic surface patches in 3-space. We show that this complexity is O(n2+ε), for any ε>0, where the constant of proportionality depends on ε and on the maximum degree of the given surfaces and of their boundaries. This extends several previous results, almost settles a 7-year-old open problem, and has applications to motion planning of general robot systems with three degrees of freedom. As a corollary of the above result, we show that the overall complexity of all the three-dimensional cells of an arrangement of n low-degree algebraic surface patches, intersected by an additional low-degree algebraic surface patch σ (the so-called zone of σ in the arrangement) is O(n2+ε), for any ε>0, where the constant of proportionality depends on ε and on the maximum degree of the given surfaces and of their boundaries.

References

  1. 1.P.K. Agarwal, M. Sharir and P. Shor, Sharp upper and lower bounds for the length of general Davenport Schinzel sequences, J. Combin. Theory, Ser. A. 52 (1989), 228-274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.B. Aronov, J. Matou~ek and M. Sharir, On the sum of squares of cell complexities in hyperplane arrangements, Proc. 7th Syrup. on Computational Geometry (1991), pp. 307-313. (To appear in J. Comb. Theory Set. A.) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.B. Aronov, M. Pellegrini and M. Shark, On the zone of a surface in a hyperplane arrangement, Discrete Cornput. Geom. 9 (1993), 177-186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.B. Aronov and M. Sharir, Triangles in space, or building (and analyzing) castles in the air, Combinatorica 10 (1990), 137-173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.B. Aronov and M. Sharir, Castles in the air revisited, Proc. 8th A CM Syrup. on Computational Geometry (1992), 146-156. (To appear in Discrete Comput. Geom.) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.B. Aronov and M. Sharir, Translational motion planning of a convex polyhedron in 3 dimensions, this volume.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.J. Bochnak, M. Coste and M-F. Roy, Gdomdtrie Algdbrique Rdelle, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.B. Chazelle, H. Edelsbrunner, L. Guibas, M. Sharir and J. Snoeyink, Computing a single face in an arrangement of line segments and related problems, SIAM J. Computing 22 (1993)(in press). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.K. Clarkson and P. Shor, Applications of random sampling in computational geometry, II, Discrete Comput. Geom. 4 (1989), 387-421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.M. de Berg, L.J. Guibas and D. Halperin, Vertical decompositions for triangles in 3-space, this volume.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.H. Edelsbrunner, Algorithms in Combinatorial Geometry, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.H. Edelsbrunner, L. Guibas, J. Pach, R. Pollack, R. Seidel and M. Sharir, Arrangements of curves in the plane- Topology, combinatorics, and algorithms, Theoretical Computer Science 92 (1992), 319-336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.H. Edelsbrunner, R. Seidel and M. Sharir, On the zone theorem in hyperplane arrangements, SIAM J. Computing 22 (1993), 418-429. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.L.J. Guibas, M. Sharir and S. Sifrony, On the general motion planning problem with two degrees of freedom, Discrete and Comput. Geom. 4 (1989), 491-521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.D. Halperin, Algorithmic Motion Planning via Arrangements of Curves and of Surfaces, Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Science Department, Tel Aviv University, July 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.D. Halperin and M. Sharir, New bounds for lower envelopes in three dimensions, with applications to visibility in terrains, Proc. 9th A CM Symp. on Computational Geometry (1993), pp. 11-18. Also to appear in Discrete Comput. Geom. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.D. Halperin and M. Sharir, Near-quadratic bounds for the motion planning problem for a polygon in a polygonal environment, Proc. $dth IEEE Syrup. on Foundations of Computer Science (1993), pp. 382-391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.S. Hart and M. Sharir, Nonlinearity of Davenport- Schinzel sequences and of generalized path compression schemes, Combinatorica 6 (1986), 151-177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.R. Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry, Springer-Verlag, New York 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.M.W. Hirsch, Differential Topology, Springer-Verlag, New York 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.P. McMullen, The maximum number of faces of a convex polytope, Mathematika 17 (1970), 179-184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22.J. Pach and M. Sharir, The upper envelope of piecewise linear functions and the boundary of a region enclosed by convex plates: Combinatorial analysis, Discrete Comput. Geom. 4 (1989), 291-309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.R. Pollack and M.F. Roy, On the number of cells defined by a set of polynomials, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, t. 316, S~rie I (1993), 573-577.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.J.T. Schwartz and M. Sharir, On the two-dimensional Davenport Schinzel problem, J. Symbolic Computation 10 (1990), 371-393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.M. Sharir, On k-sets in arrangements of curves and surfaces, Discrete Comput. Geom. 6 (1991), 593-613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.M. Sharir, Almost tight upper bounds for lower envelopes in higher dimensions, Proc. $dth IEEE Syrup. on Foundations of Computer Science (1993), pp. 498- 507. Also to appear in Discrete Comput. Geom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Almost tight upper bounds for the single cell and zone problems in three dimensions

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SCG '94: Proceedings of the tenth annual symposium on Computational geometry
                June 1994
                400 pages
                ISBN:0897916484
                DOI:10.1145/177424

                Copyright © 1994 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 10 June 1994

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader