A Synthesis-Oriented VHDL Course

Abstract

This article proposes a VHDL language course that establishes a strong correlation between the language statements and their use in circuit synthesis. Two course modules are described: a basic module that contains the essential concepts of the language, sufficient for students to describe medium complexity circuits, followed by a second module with more complex language concepts. The benefits of correlated laboratory tasks which use simulation and synthesis tools are discussed. Evaluation content, student test scores, and student feedback are presented. Suggestions for improving and modifying the course are given.

References

1. Amaral J. N., Berube P., and Mehta, P. 2005. Teaching digital design to computing science students in a single academic term. IEEE Trans. Educ. 48, 1, 127--132.
2. Ahamed, F. and Scarpino, F. A. 2005. An educational digital communications project using FPGAs to implement a BPSK detector. IEEE Trans. Educ. 48, 1, 191--197.
3. Armstrong, J. 1997. A multilevel approach to teaching hardware description languages. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Microelectronics Systems Education (MSE’97). 5--6.
4. Baliga, G. R., Robinson, J., and Weiss L. 2010. Revitalizing CS hardware curricula: Object oriented hardware design. J. Comput. Sciences Colleges 25, 3, Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges.
5. Calazans, N. L. V. and Moraes, F. G. 2001. Integrating the teaching of computer organization and architecture with digital hardware design early in undergraduate courses. IEEE Trans. Educ. 44, 2, 109--119.
6. Carlson, B. S. 2001. Principles vs. practices in undergraduate microelectronic systems education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education (MSE’01). IEEE Computer Society. 22--23.
7. d’Amore, R. 2005. VHDL Description and Synthesis of Digital Circuits (in Portuguese), LTC.
8. Duckworth, R. J. 2005. Embedded system design with FPGAs using HDLs lessons learned and pitfalls to be avoided. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education (MSE’05). IEEE Computer Society. 35--36.
9. Edwards, S. A. 2005. The challenges of hardware synthesis from C-like languages. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation, and Test in Europe (DATE’05). Vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society. 66--67.
10. Engel, M. and Spinczyk, O. 2008. Aspects in hardware - What do they look like? In Proceedings of the AOSD Workshop on Aspects, Components, and Patterns for Infrastructure Software (ACP4IS’08). ACM.
11. Fitzpatrick, T. 2004. SystemVerilog for VHDL Users. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation, and Test in Europe (DATE’04). Vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society. 1334--1339.
12. Gschwind, M. 1994. Reprogrammable hardware for educational purposes. In Proceedings of the 25th SIGCSE Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’94).
13. Harcourt, E. 2005. Teaching Computer Organization and Architecture Using SystemC. J. Comput. Sciences Colleges 21, 2, Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges. 27--39.
14. Nestor, J. A. 2005. Teaching computer organization with HDLs: An incremental approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education (MSE’05). IEEE Computer Society. 77--88.
15. Maginot, S. 1992. Evaluation criteria of HDLs: VHDL compared to Verilog, UDL/I & M. In Proceedings of the Conference on European Design Automation (EURO-DAC’’92). IEEE Computer Society. 746--751.
16. Pedroni, V. A. 2003. Teaching design oriented VHDL. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education (MSE’03). IEEE Computer Society. 6--7.
17. SE2004 Joint IEEE-CS/ACM Task Force on Computing Curricula, Software Engineering. 2004. Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering. 2004. http://sites.computer.org/ccse/SE2004Volume.pdf.
18. Sciuto, D., Martin, G., Rosenstiel, W., Swan, S., Ghenassia, F., Flake, P., and Srouji, J. 2004. SystemC and SystemVerilog: Where do they fit? Where are they going. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation, and Test in Europe (DATE’04). Vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society. 122--127.
19. Smith, D. J. 1996. VHDL & Verilog compared & contrasted - plus modeled example in VHDL, Verilog and C. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Design Automation Conference (DAC’96). ACM, 771--776.
20. Sklyarov, V. and Skliarova, I. 2005. Teaching reconfigurable systems: Methods, tools, tutorials, and projects. IEEE Trans. Educ. 48, 2, 290--300.
21. Vranesic, Z. and Brown, S. 2003. Use of HDLs in teaching of computer hardware courses. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Architecture Education (WCAE’03).
22. Wainer, G. A., Daicz, S., Simoni, L. F. S., and Wassermann, D. 2001. Using the Alfa-1 Simulated Processor for Educational Purposes. J. Educ. Res. Comput. 1, 4, 111--151.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education

        • Information science education