skip to main content
10.1145/1791314.1791341acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Energy-aware traffic engineering

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Energy consumption of the Internet is already substantial and it is likely to increase as operators deploy faster equipment to handle popular bandwidth-intensive services, such as streaming and video-on-demand. Existing work on energy saving considers local adaptation relying primarily on hardware-based techniques, such as sleeping and rate adaptation. We argue that a complete solution requires a network-wide approach that works in conjunction with local measures. However, traditional traffic engineering objectives do not include energy. This paper presents Energy-Aware Traffic engineering (EATe), a technique that takes energy consumption into account while achieving the same traffic rates as the energy-oblivious approaches. EATe uses a scalable, online technique to spread the load among multiple paths so as to increase energy savings. Our extensive ns-2 simulations over realistic topologies show that EATe succeeds in moving 21% of the links to the sleep state, while keeping the same sending rates and being close to the optimal energy-aware solution. Further, we demonstrate that EATe successfully handles changes in traffic load and quickly restores a low overall energy state. Alternatively, EATe can move links to lower energy levels, resulting in energy savings of 8%. Finally, EATe can succeed in making 16% of active routers sleep.

References

  1. Power and Thermal Management in the Intel Core Duo Processor. Intel Technology Journal, 10, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Y. Agarwal, S. Hodges, J. Scott, R. Chandra, P. Bahl, and R. Gupta. Augmenting Network Interfaces to Reduce PC Energy Usage. In NSDI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Chabarek, J. Sommers, P. Barford, C. Estan, D. Tsiang, and S. Wright. Power Awareness in Network Design and Routing. In INFOCOM, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Chiaraviglio, M. Mellia, and F. Neri. Energy-aware Backbone Networks: a Case Study. In GreenComm, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Fischer, N. Kammenhuber, and A. Feldmann. REPLEX: Dynamic Traffic Engineering Based on Wardrop Routing Policies. In CoNEXT, pages 1--12, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Guichard, F. le Faucheur, and J. P. Vasseur. Definitive MPLS Network Designs. Cisco Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Gunaratne, K. Christensen, and B. Nordman. Managing Energy Consumption Costs in Desktop PCs and LAN Switches with Proxying, Split TCP Connections, and Scaling of Link Speed. Int. J. Netw. Manag., 15(5):297--310, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Gunaratne, K. Christensen, B. Nordman, and S. Suen. Reducing the Energy Consumption of Ethernet with Adaptive Link Rate (ALR). IEEE Trans. Comput., 57(4):448--461, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Gupta, S. Grover, and S. Singh. A Feasibility Study for Power Management in LAN Switches. In ICNP, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Gupta and S. Singh. Greening of the Internet. In SIGCOMM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Hays. Active/Idle Toggling with Low-Power Idle. http://www.ieee802.org/3/az/public/jan08/hays_01_0108.pdf, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. He, M. Suchara, M. Bresler, J. Rexford, and M. Chiang. Rethinking Internet Traffic Management: from Multiple Decompositions to a Practical Protocol. In CoNEXT, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Heath, A. P. Centeno, P. George, L. Ramos, Y. Jaluria, and R. Bianchini. Mercury and Freon: Temperature Emulation and Management for Server Systems. In ASPLOS-XII, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Kandula, D. Katabi, B. Davie, and A. Charny. Walking the Tightrope: Responsive yet Stable Traffic Engineering. In SIGCOMM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Katabi, M. Handley, and C. Rohrs. Internet Congestion Control for High Bandwidth-Delay Product Networks. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Khanna and J. Zinky. The revised ARPANET routing metric. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 19(4):45--56, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. P. Mahadevan, P. Sharma, S. Banerjee, and P. Ranganathan. Energy Aware Network Operations. In IEEE Global Internet Symposium, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Mahadevan, P. Sharma, S. Banerjee, and P. Ranganathan. A power benchmarking framework for network devices. In NETWORKING, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Mandviwalla and N.-F. Tzeng. Energy-Efficient Scheme for Multiprocessor-Based Router Linecards. In IEEE SAINT, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Nedevschi, L. Popa, G. Iannaccone, S. Ratnasamy, and D. Wetherall. Reducing Network Energy Consumption via Sleeping and Rate-Adaptation. In NSDI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. N. Spring, R. Mahajan, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. Measuring ISP Topologies with Rocketfuel. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 12(1):2--16, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. S. Tucker. Modelling Energy Consumption in IP Networks. In Cisco Green Research Symposium, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. N. Vasić and D. Kostić. Energy-aware Traffic Engineering. Technical report, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. N. Vasić, S. Kuntimaddi, and D. Kostić. One Bit Is Enough: a Framework for Deploying Explicit Feedback Congestion Control Protocols. In COMSNETS, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. B. Zhai, D. Blaauw, D. Sylvester, and K. Flautner. Theoretical and Practical Limits of Dynamic Voltage Scaling. In DAC, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Energy-aware traffic engineering

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        e-Energy '10: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Energy-Efficient Computing and Networking
        April 2010
        239 pages
        ISBN:9781450300421
        DOI:10.1145/1791314

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader