skip to main content
10.1145/1806689.1806702acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A strong direct product theorem for disjointness

Published:05 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

A strong direct product theorem states that if we want to compute k independent instances of a function, using less than k times the resources needed for one instance, then the overall success probability will be exponentially small in k. We establish such a theorem for the randomized communication complexity of the Disjointness problem, i.e., with communication const• kn the success probability of solving k instances of size n can only be exponentially small in k. This solves an open problem of [KSW07, LSS08]. We also show that this bound even holds for $AM$-communication protocols with limited ambiguity. The main result implies a new lower bound for Disjointness in a restricted 3-player NOF protocol, and optimal communication-space tradeoffs for Boolean matrix product. Our main result follows from a solution to the dual of a linear programming problem, whose feasibility comes from a so-called Intersection Sampling Lemma that generalizes a result by Razborov [Raz92].

References

  1. S. Aaronson and A. Ambainis. Quantum search of spatial regions. In Proceedings of 44th IEEE FOCS, pages 200--209, 2003. quant-ph/0303041. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. Abrahamson. A time-space tradeoff for Boolean matrix multiplication. In Proceedings of 31st IEEE FOCS, pages 412--419, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andris Ambainis, Robert Spalek, Ronald de Wolf. A New Quantum Lower Bound Method, with Applications to Direct Product Theorems and Time-Space Tradeoffs. In Algorithmica, 55(3): 422--461, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Babai, P. Frankl, and J. Simon. Complexity classes in communication complexity theory. In Proceedings of 27th IEEE FOCS, pages 337--347, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ziv Bar-Yossef, T. S. Jayram, Ravi Kumar, D. Sivakumar. An information statistics approach to data stream and communication complexity. In J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 68(4): 702--772, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boaz Barak, Mark Braverman, Xi Chen, and Anup Rao. How to Compress Interactive Communication. In STOC 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Beame, M. Tompa, and P. Yan. Communication-space tradeoffs for unrestricted protocols. SIAM Journal on Computing, 23(3):652--661, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Paul Beame, Toniann Pitassi, Nathan Segerlind, Avi Wigderson. A Strong Direct Product Theorem for Corruption and the Multiparty Communication Complexity of Disjointness. In Computational Complexity, 15(4): 391--432, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Avraham Ben-Aroya, Oded Regev, Ronald de Wolf. A Hypercontractive Inequality for Matrix-Valued Functions with Applications to Quantum Computing and LDCs. In FOCS 2008, pages 477--486, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Chattopadhyay, A. Ada. Multiparty Communication Complexity of Disjointness. ECCC Technical Report 15(002), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Impagliazzo, R. Jaiswal, V. Kabanets, A. Wigderson. Uniform Direct Product Theorems: Simplified, Optimized, and Derandomized. In: STOC 2008, pages 579--588, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rahul Jain, Hartmut Klauck, Ashwin Nayak. Direct product theorems for classical communication complexity via subdistribution bounds. In: STOC 2008, pages 599--608, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rahul Jain, Hartmut Klauck. The Partition Bound for Classical Communication Complexity and Query Complexity. To appear in IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity 2010. See arXiv:0910.4266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. S. Jayram, Ravi Kumar, D. Sivakumar. Two applications of information complexity. In STOC 2003, pages 673--682, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Kalyanasundaram and G. Schnitger. The probabilistic communication complexity of set intersection. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 5(4):545--557, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mauricio Karchmer, Ilan Newman, Michael E. Saks, Avi Wigderson. Non-Deterministic Communication Complexity with Few Witnesses. In J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 49(2): 247--257, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mauricio Karchmer, Eyal Kushilevitz, Noam Nisan. Fractional Covers and Communication Complexity. In SIAM J. Discrete Math., 8(1): 76--92, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hartmut Klauck. Rectangle Size Bounds and Threshold Covers in Communication Complexity. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity 2003, pages 118--134, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartmut Klauck. Quantum and Classical Communication-Space Tradeoffs from Rectangle Bounds. In FSTTCS 2004, pages 384--395, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hartmut Klauck. Lower Bounds for Quantum Communication Complexity. SIAM J. Comput., 37(1): 20--46, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hartmut Klauck, Robert Spalek, Ronald de Wolf. Quantum and Classical Strong Direct Product Theorems and Optimal Time-Space Tradeoffs. In SIAM J. Comput., 36(5): 1472--1493, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. E. Kushilevitz and N. Nisan. Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. T.W. Lam, P. Tiwari, and M. Tompa. Trade-offs between communication and space. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences, 45(3):296--315, 1992. Earlier version in STOC'89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Troy Lee, Adi Shraibman, Robert Spalek. A Direct Product Theorem for Discrepancy. IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 71--80, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Troy Lee, Adi Shraibman. Disjointness is Hard in the Multiparty Number-on-the-Forehead Model. Computational Complexity, 18(2): 309--336, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Nati Linial, Adi Shraibman. Lower bounds in communication complexity based on factorization norms. Random Struct. Algorithms, 34(3), pages 368--394, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. L. Lovász. Communication Complexity: A Survey. In Paths, Flows, and VLSI Layout, edited by B. H. Korte, Springer, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. N. Nisan, S. Rudich, and M. Saks. Products and help bits in decision trees. In Proceedings of 35th FOCS, pages 318--329, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. N. Nisan and M. Szegedy. On the degree of Boolean functions as real polynomials. Computational Complexity, 4(4):301--313, 1994. Earlier version in STOC'92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. I. Parnafes, R. Raz, and A. Wigderson. Direct product results and the GCD problem, in old and new communication models. In Proceedings of 29th ACM STOC, pages 363--372, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. A. Razborov. On the distributional complexity of disjointness. Theoretical Computer Science, 106(2):385--390, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. A. Razborov. Quantum communication complexity of symmetric predicates. Izvestiya of the Russian Academy of Science, mathematics, 67(1):159--176, 2003. quant-ph/0204025.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. R. Shaltiel. Towards proving strong direct product theorems. In Proceedings of 16th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 107--119, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Alexander A. Sherstov. The pattern matrix method for lower bounds on quantum communication. STOC 2008, pages 85--94, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Falk Unger. A Probabilistic Inequality with Applications to Threshold Direct-product Theorems. FOCS 2009, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. E. Viola and A. Wigderson. One-way multi-party communication lower bound for pointer jumping with applications. In: Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Emanuele Viola, Avi Wigderson. Norms, XOR Lemmas, and Lower Bounds for Polynomials and Protocols. In Theory of Computing 4(1): 137--168, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. A. C-C. Yao. Some Complexity Questions Related to Distributive Computing. In Proceedings of STOC 1979, pages 209--213, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. A. C-C. Yao. Theory and applications of trapdoor functions. In Proceedings of 23rd IEEE FOCS, pages 80--91, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. C-C. Yao. Lower Bounds by Probabilistic Arguments. 24th IEEE Symp. Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 420--428, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A strong direct product theorem for disjointness

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            STOC '10: Proceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computing
            June 2010
            812 pages
            ISBN:9781450300506
            DOI:10.1145/1806689

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 5 June 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

            Upcoming Conference

            STOC '24
            56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
            June 24 - 28, 2024
            Vancouver , BC , Canada

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader