skip to main content
10.1145/1837274.1837495acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Impact of process variations on emerging memristor

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The memristor, known as the fourth basic two-terminal circuit element, has attracted many research interests since the first real device was developed by HP labs in 2008. The nano-scale memristive device has the potential to construct some novel computing systems because of its distinctive characters, such as non-volatility, non-linearity, low-power, and good scalability. These electrical characteristics of memristors are mainly determined by the material characteristic and the fabrication process. For example, process variations may cause the deviation of the actual electrical behavior of memristors from the original design and result in the malfunction of the device. Therefore, it is very important to understand and characterize the impact of process variations on the electrical behaviors of the memristor and its implication to the circuit design. In this paper, we analyze the impact of the geometry variations on the electrical characteristics of the memristor. Two parameters - NARD (Normalized Accumulative Resistance Deviation) and NAARD (Normalized Accumulative Absolute Resistance Deviation), are introduced to measure the fluctuation of the overall internal state (or the resistance) of a memristor under the impact of process variations. Based on our analysis, Monte-Carlo simulations are conducted to evaluate the device mismatch effects in the memristor-based memory.

References

  1. L. Chua. Memristor-the missing circuit element. IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, 18(5):507--519, Sep 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. B. Strukov et al. The missing memristor found. In Nature, volume 453, pages 80--83, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Ho, G. M. Huang, and P. Li. Nonvolatile memristor memory: device characteristics and design implications. In ICCAD 2009., Nov. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. V. Pershin and M. D. Ventra. Experimental demonstration of associative memory with memristive neural networks. In Nature Precedings, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. H. Choi et al. An electrically modifiable synapse array of resistive switching memory. Nanotechnology, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. V. Pershin and M. D. Ventra. Practical approach to programmable analog circuits with memristors. ArXiv e-prints, August 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Asenov, S. Kaya, and A. R. Brown. Intrinsic parameter fluctuations in decananometer mosfets introduced by gate line edge roughness. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 50(5):1254--1260, May 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. P. Oldiges et al. Modeling line edge roughness effects in sub 100 nanometer gate length devices. In SISPAD., pages 131--134, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. G. Roy et al. Simulation study of individual and combined sources of intrinsic parameter fluctuations in conventional nano-mosfets. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 53(12):3063--3070, Dec. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. H. Jo, K. Kim, and W. Lu. High-density crossbar arrays based on a si memristive system. In Nano Lett., volume 9, pages 870--874, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. X. Wang et al. Spintronic memristor through spin-torque-induced magnetization motion. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 30(3):294--297, March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Kaya et al. Analysis of statistical fluctuations due to line edge roughness in sub 0.1μm mosfet's. In SISPAD., pages 78--81, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Yu et al. Full 3d simulation of gate line edge roughness impact on sub-30 nm finfets. Silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (SNW), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DAC '10: Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference
    June 2010
    1036 pages
    ISBN:9781450300025
    DOI:10.1145/1837274

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 June 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

    Upcoming Conference

    DAC '24
    61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
    June 23 - 27, 2024
    San Francisco , CA , USA

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader