The emotional impact of search tasks

ABSTRACT

In this paper we consider the emotional impact of search tasks within Information Retrieval experiments. We study how search tasks of different types lead to different emotionalresponses by experimental participants and study the interaction between emotions and other subjective search variables. We show that some search tasks can lead to negative emotional responses whilst others are characterised by positive experiences. We discuss these findings with respect to how experiments are designed and conducted in Information Retrieval and how studying emotion within experimentation can lead to improved experimental design.

References

1. C. L. Barry and L. Schamber. Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison. Inf. Process. Manage., 34(2-3):219--236, 1998.
2. M. Beaulieu. Experiments with interfaces to support query expansion. J. Doc., 53(1):8--19, 1997.
3. D. Bell and I. Ruthven. Searchers' assessments of task complexity for web searching. In Proceedings of the 26th European Conference in Information Retrieval (ECIR 04), pages 57--71, 2004.
4. D. Bilal and I. Bachir. Children's interaction with cross-cultural and multilingual digital libraries ii: information seeking, success, and affective experience. Inf. Process. Manage., 43(1):65--80, 2007.
5. P. Borlund. Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. J. Doc., 56(1):71--90, 2000.
6. K. Byström and P. Hansen. Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 56(10):1050--1061, 2005.
7. K. Byström and K. Järvelin. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Inf. Process. Manage., 31(2):191--213, 1995.
8. J. Gwizdka and I. Lopatovska. The role of subjective factors in the information search process. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 60(12):2452--2464, 2009.
9. J. Gwizdka and I. Spence. Implicit measures of lostness and success in web navigation. Interact. Comput., 19(3):357--369, 2007.
10. D. Kelly. Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users. Now Publishers Inc., Hanover, MA, USA, 2009.
11. J. Kracker. Research anxiety and students' perceptions of research: An experiment. Part I. effect of teaching Kuhlthau's ISP model. JASIST, 53(4):282--294, 2002.
12. J. Kracker and P. Wang. Research anxiety and students' perceptions of research: An experiment. Part II. content analysis of their writings on two experiences. JASIST, 53(4):295--307, 2002.
13. C. C. Kuhlthau. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 42(5):361--371, 1999.
14. I. Lopatovska. Searching for good mood: examining relationships between search task and mood. In Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009.
15. D. Nahl. Affective and cognitive information behavior: Interaction effects in internet use. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005.
16. A. Sherry and R. Henson. Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: a user-friendly primer. J Pers Assess, 84(1):37--48, 2005.
17. J. Tague-Sutcliffe. The pragmatics of information retrieval experimentation, revisited. Inf. Process. Manage., 28(4):467--490, 1992.
18. J. Teevan, C. Alvarado, M. S. Ackerman, and D. R. Karger. The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search. In CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 415--422, 2004.
19. C. Tenopir, P. Wang, Y. Zhang, B. Simmons, and R. Pollard. Academic users' interactions with ScienceDirect in search tasks: Affective and cognitive behaviors. Inf. Process. Manage., 44(1):105--121, 2008.

Index Terms

• Information systems

  • Information retrieval

    • Information retrieval query processing