skip to main content
10.1145/1851182.1851212acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Cloudward bound: planning for beneficial migration of enterprise applications to the cloud

Published:30 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we tackle challenges in migrating enterprise services into hybrid cloud-based deployments, where enterprise operations are partly hosted on-premise and partly in the cloud. Such hybrid architectures enable enterprises to benefit from cloud-based architectures, while honoring application performance requirements, and privacy restrictions on what services may be migrated to the cloud. We make several contributions. First, we highlight the complexity inherent in enterprise applications today in terms of their multi-tiered nature, large number of application components, and interdependencies. Second, we have developed a model to explore the benefits of a hybrid migration approach. Our model takes into account enterprise-specific constraints, cost savings, and increased transaction delays and wide-area communication costs that may result from the migration. Evaluations based on real enterprise applications and Azure-based cloud deployments show the benefits of a hybrid migration approach, and the importance of planning which components to migrate. Third, we shed insight on security policies associated with enterprise applications in data centers. We articulate the importance of ensuring assurable reconfiguration of security policies as enterprise applications are migrated to the cloud. We present algorithms to achieve this goal, and demonstrate their efficacy on realistic migration scenarios.

References

  1. Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2). http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amazon Virtual Private Cloud. http://aws.amazon.com/vpc/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Amazon Web Services: Overview of Security Processes, White Paper. http://aws.amazon.com/security.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Animoto - Scaling Through Viral Growth. http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2008/04/animoto--scali.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DB2 for z/OS Performance Monitoring and Tuning Guide. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/dzichelp/v2r2/topic/com.ibm.db29.doc.perf/dsnpfk17.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. IBM ILOG CPLEX. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/integration/optimization/cplex/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. IBM Service Management Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager Software. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/taddm/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Microsoft Windows Azure. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Riverbed Technology. http://www.riverbed.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. SQL Azure Firewall. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee621782.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. The Case Against Cloud Computing. http://www.cio.com/article/477473/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Websphere application server performance monitoring infrastructure (pmi). http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v6r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.websphere.express.doc/info/exp/ae/cprf_pmi_arch.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. K. Aguilera, J. C. Mogul, J. L. Wiener, P. Reynolds, and A. Muthitacharoen. Performance Debugging for Distributed Systems of Black Boxes. In Proc. SOSP, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Armbrust, A. Fox, R. Griffith, A. D. Joseph, R. H. Katz, A. Konwinski, G. Lee, D. A. Patterson, A. Rabkin, I. Stoica, and M. Zaharia. Above the clouds: A Berkeley view of cloud computing. Technical Report UCB/EECS-2009--28, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, Feb 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Arthur Cole. The Future Belongs to Hybrid Clouds. http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/the-future-belongs-to-hybrid-clouds/?cs=30482.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. H. Cormen, C. Stein, R. L. Rivest, and C. E. Leiserson. Introduction to Algorithms. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Gottfrid. The New York Times Archives + Amazon Web Services = TimesMachine. http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/21/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Hamilton. The Cost of Latency. http://perspectives.mvdirona.com/2009/10/31/TheCostOfLatency.aspx, Oct. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L. E. Li, M. F. Nowlan, C. Tian, Y. R. Yang, and M. Zhang. Mosaic: Policy Homomorphic Network Extension. Technical Report YALEU/DCS/TR-1427, CS Department, Yale University, Feb 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Tawarmalani and N. V. Sahinidis. Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs: A theoretical and computational study. Mathematical Programming, 99(3):563--591, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. Magoutis, M. Devarakonda, and K. Muniswamy-Reddy. Galapagos: Automatically Discovering Application-Data Relationships in Networked Systems. In Proc. IM, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. M. O'Neill. Connecting to the cloud. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-cloudpt1/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. K. Sripanidkulchai, S. Sahu, Y. Ruan, A. Shaikh, and C. Dorai. Are Clouds Ready for Large Distributed Applications? In Proc. SOSP LADIS Workshop, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Y.-W. E. Sung, S. G. Rao, G. G. Xie, and D. A. Maltz. Towards systematic design of enterprise networks. In Proc. CoNEXT, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Symantec. 2010 State of the Data Center Global Data. http://www.symantec.com/content/en/us/about/media/pdfs/Symantec_DataCenter10_Report_Global.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. B. Urgaonkar, G. Pacifici, P. J. Shenoy, M. Spreitzer, and A. N. Tantawi. An analytical model for multi-tier internet services and its applications. In Proc. SIGMETRICS, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. B. Urgaonkar, P. Shenoy, A. Chandra, and P. Goyal. Dynamic Provisioning of Multi-tier Internet Applications. In Proc. ICAC, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. T. Wood, P. Shenoy, A. Gerber, K. Ramakrishnan, and J. V. der Merwe. The Case for Enterprise-Ready Virtual Private Clouds. In Proc. HotCloud Workshop, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. G. Xie, J. Zhan, D. A. Maltz, H. Zhang, A. Greenberg, G. Hjalmtysson, and J. Rexford. On static reachability analysis of IP networks. In Proc. INFOCOM, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Cloudward bound: planning for beneficial migration of enterprise applications to the cloud

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCOMM '10: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 conference
        August 2010
        500 pages
        ISBN:9781450302012
        DOI:10.1145/1851182
        • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
          ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 40, Issue 4
          SIGCOMM '10
          October 2010
          481 pages
          ISSN:0146-4833
          DOI:10.1145/1851275
          Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 August 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader