skip to main content
10.1145/1851600.1851621acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Contextual push-to-talk: shortening voice dialogs to improve driving performance

Published:07 September 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a driving simulator-based evaluation of a new technique for simplifying in-vehicle device interactions and thereby improving driver safety. We show that the use of multiple, contextually linked push-to-talk buttons (Multi-PTT) shortens voice dialog duration versus the use of a conventional, single push-to-talk button (Single-PTT). This benefit comes without detriment to driving performance or visual attention to the forward roadway. Test subjects also preferred the Multi-PTT approach over the conventional approach, and reported that it imposed a lower cognitive workload.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p113-weinberg.mov

mov

48.3 MB

References

  1. Alewine, N., Ruback, H., and Deligne, S. 2004. Pervasive Speech Recognition. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3, 4 (Oct. 2004), 78--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1994). Changes in driver behaviour as a function of hands-free mobile phones - A simulator study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 26, 441--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Art Lebedev Studios. Optimus Mini Three. http://www.artlebedev.com/everything/optimus-mini, Retrieved 12 May, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bach, K., Jæger, M., Skov, M. B., and Thomassen, N. 2008. You can touch, but you can't look: interacting with in-vehicle systems. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 05 - 10, 2008). CHI '08. ACM, New York, NY, 1139--1148. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357233 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Barón, A. and Green, P. (2006). Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-Vehicle Tasks while Driving: A Brief Literature Review. Technical Report UMTRI 2006-5. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chittaro, L. and De Marco, L. Driver Distraction Caused by Mobile Devices: Studying and Reducing Safety Risks. In Proceedings of the 1st Int'l Workshop Mobile Technologies and Health: Benefits and Risks (Udine, Italy, 2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D-Box GP PRO-200 RC, http://www.d-box.com/gaming/en/products/pro-gaming-series/gp-pro-200-rc/, Retrieved 12 May, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Divi, V., Forlines, C., Van Gemert, J., Raj, B., Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Wittenburg, K., Woelfel, J., Wolf, P., and Zhang, F. 2004. A speech-in list-out approach to spoken user interfaces. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004: Short Papers on XX (Boston, Massachusetts, May 02 - 07, 2004). Human Language Technology Conference. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, 113--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Federal Register, Vol. 75, No. 17. FR Doc. 2010-1573 Filed 1-22-10. http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/administration/rulemakings/notices/Texting-by-Commercial-Motor-Vehicle.pdf. Retrieved 12 May, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford Sync, http://www.syncmyride.com/, Retrieved 12 May, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Forlines, C., Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Raj, B., Wittenburg, K., Wolf, P. A Comparison between Spoken Queries and Menu-based Interfaces for In-Car Digital Music Selection. In Proceedings IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (September 12 - 16, 2005). INTERACT '05. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 536--549. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Garay-Vega, L., Pradhan, A.K., Weinberg, G., Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Harsham, B., Shen, Y., Divekar, G., Romoser, M., Knodler, M., Fisher, D.L. 2010. Evaluation of Different Speech and Touch Interfaces to In-Vehicle Music Retrieval Systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 3 (May 2010), 913--920.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Graf, S., Spiessl, W., Schmidt, A., Winter, A., and Rigoll, G. 2008. In-car interaction using search-based user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 05 - 10, 2008). CHI '08. ACM, New York, NY, 1685--1688. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357317 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. 1988. Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload, 139--183. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Image Space Incoporated, rFactor. http://www.rfactor.net/, Retrieved 12 May, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Itoh, K., Miki, Y., Yoshitsugu, N., Kubo, N., & Mashimo, S. 2004. Evaluation of a Voice-Activated System Using a Driving Simulator. SAE paper 2004-01-0232. Warrendale, PA: SAE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kun, A. L., Paek, T., Medenica, }., Memarovic, N., and Palinko, O. 2009. Glancing at personal navigation devices can affect driving: experimental results and design implications. In Proceedings of the 1st international Conference on Automotive User interfaces and interactive Vehicular Applications (Essen, Germany, September 21 - 22, 2009). AutomotiveUI '09. ACM, New York, NY, 129--136. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1620509.1620534 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Palinko O., Kun A.L. 2008. Steering Wheel Sensor as a Push-To-Talk Solution. In Proceedings of the Fourth IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE08), Seattle, WA, July 21--22, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. rFactor Central, Coast Track 1.00, http://www.rfactorcentral.com/detail.cfm?ID=Coast%20Track, Retrieved 12 May, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Richtel, M. (2009). "Utah Gets Tough with Texting Drivers." New York Times, August 29, 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/29/technology/29distracted.html, Retrieved 12 May, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Salvucci, D. D., Markley, D., Zuber, M., and Brumby, D. P. 2007. iPod distraction: effects of portable music-player use on driver performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA, April 28 - May 03, 2007). CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 243--250. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240665 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Seeing Machines faceLAB 5, http://www.seeingmachines.com/product/facelab/, Retrieved 12 May, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sicconi, R., White, K. D., Ruback, H., Viswanathan, M., Eckhart, J., Badt, D., Morita, M., Satomura, M., Nagashima, N., Kondo, K. 2009. Honda Next Generation Speech User Interface. SAE World Congress & Exhibition, April 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Strayer D. L., Drews, F. A., Crouch D. J. 2006. A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver. Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48, 2 (2006), 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Texting While Driving PSA, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGE8LzRaySk, Retrieved 12 May, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Walker, M. A., Borland J., Kamm, C. A. 1999. The utility of elapsed time as a usability metric for spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding. ASRU '99. 317--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Weinberg, G. 2009. Contextual push-to-talk: a new technique for reducing voice dialog duration. In Proceedings of the 11th international Conference on Human-Computer interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Bonn, Germany, September 15 - 18, 2009). MobileHCI '09. ACM, New York, NY, 1--2. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1613858.1613960 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Weinberg, G. and Harsham, B. 2009. Developing a low-cost driving simulator for the evaluation of in-vehicle technologies. In Proceedings of the 1st international Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Essen, Germany, September 21 - 22, 2009). AutomotiveUI '09. ACM, New York, NY, 51--54. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1620509.1620519 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wolf, P., Woelfel, J., van Gemert, J., Raj, B., and Wong, D. 2004. SpokenQuery: An Alternate Approach to Choosing Items with Speech. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech and Language Processing (Jeju Island, South Korea, October 4-8, 2004). ICSLP '04. ISCA, 2004, 221--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Contextual push-to-talk: shortening voice dialogs to improve driving performance

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MobileHCI '10: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services
          September 2010
          552 pages
          ISBN:9781605588353
          DOI:10.1145/1851600
          • General Chairs:
          • Marco de Sá,
          • Luís Carriço,
          • Program Chair:
          • Nuno Correia

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 September 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          MobileHCI '10 Paper Acceptance Rate46of225submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader