Gopinaath Kannabiran
Marianne Graves Petersen
ABSTRACT
At the birth of participatory design, there was a strong political consciousness surrounding the design of new technology, the design process in particular, establishing a rich set of methods and tools for user-centered design. Today, the term design has extended its scope of concern beyond the process of design and into how users interact with the designed product on a day-to-day basis.
This paper is an attempt to call to attention the need for a new set of methods, attitudes and approaches, along with the existing, to discuss, analyze and reflect upon the politics at the interface. By presenting a critical analysis of two design cases, we elicit the importance of such an agenda and the implications for design in doing so. We use the Foucauldian notion of power to analyze the power relationships in these two cases and to articulate the politics at the interface. We conclude by emphasizing the need for furthering this agenda and outlining future work.
- Bannon, L. J. From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. Human-computer interaction: toward the year 2000. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1995. p. 205--214. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bannon, L. J., Bødker, S. Beyond the interface: encountering artifacts in use. Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface. Cambridge University Press, 1991. p. 227--253. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, J., Bardzell S. Intimate interactions: online representation and software of the self. Interactions, Vol. 15, Issue 5. ACM Press, 2008. p. 11--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, S. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. Proc. of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, 2010. p. 1301--1310. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proc. of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles. ACM Press, 2006. p. 1--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dunne, A. Hertzian Tales - Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. MIT Press, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1 An Introduction. Pantheon, 1978.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. Truth and Power. Power/Knowledge. Harvester, 1980.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Penguin, 1991.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B., Nissenbaum, H. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 14, Issue 3. ACM Press, 1996. p. 330--347. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mills, S. Michel Foucault. Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
- Rith, C., Dubberly, H. Why Horst W. J. Rittel Matters. Design Issues, Vol. 23, No. 1. MIT Press, 2007. p. 72--91.Google Scholar
- Turkle, S. Life on the Screen. Simon & Schuster, 1995Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Politics at the interface: a Foucauldian power analysis
Recommendations
On and beyond artifacts in moral relations: accounting for power and violence in Coeckelbergh’s social relationism
AbstractThe ubiquity of technology in our lives and its culmination in artificial intelligence raises questions about its role in our moral considerations. In this paper, we address a moral concern in relation to technological systems given their deep ...
'Power and the digital divide'
The ethical and political dilemmas raised by Information and Communication Technology (ICT) have only just begun to be understood. The impact of centralised data collection, mass communication technologies or the centrality of computer technology as a means ...
Invoking politics and ethics in the design of information technology: undesigning the design
It is a truism that the design and deployment of information and communication technologies is vital to everyday life, the conduct of work and to social order. But how are individual, organisational and societal choices made? What might it mean to ...
Comments