skip to main content
10.1145/1869790.1869808acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Local network Voronoi diagrams

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Continuous queries in road networks have gained significant research interests due to advances in GIS and mobile computing. Consider the following scenario: "A driver uses a networked GPS navigator to monitor five nearest gas stations in a road network." The main challenge of processing such a moving query is how to efficiently monitor network distances of the k nearest and possible resultant objects. To enable result monitoring in real-time, researchers have devised techniques which utilize precomputed distances and results, e.g., the network Voronoi diagram (NVD). However, the main drawback of preprocessing is that it requires access to all data objects and network nodes, which means that it is not suitable for large datasets in many real life situations. The best existing method to monitor kNN results without precomputation relies on executions of snapshot queries at network nodes encountered by the query point. This method results in repetitive distance evaluation over the same or similar sets of nodes. In this paper, we propose a method called the local network Voronoi diagram (LNVD) to compute query answers for a small area around the query point. As a result, our method requires neither precomputation nor distance evaluation at every intersection. According to our extensive analysis and experimental results, our method significantly outperforms the best existing method in terms of data access and computation costs.

References

  1. H.-J. Cho and C.-W. Chung. An efficient and scalable approach to CNN queries in a road network. In VLDB, pages 865--876, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. U. Demiryurek, F. B. Kashani, and C. Shahabi. Efficient continuous nearest neighbor query in spatial networks using Euclidean restriction. In SSTD, pages 25--43, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. K. Deng, X. Zhou, H. T. Shen, S. W. Sadiq, and X. Li. Instance optimal query processing in spatial networks. VLDB J., 18(3):675--693, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. W. Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Numeriche Mathematik, 1:269--271, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. L. Fredman and R. E. Tarjan. Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms. J. ACM, 34(3):596--615, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. R. Hjaltason and H. Samet. Distance browsing in spatial databases. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 24(2):265--318, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. R. Kolahdouzan and C. Shahabi. Voronoi-based k nearest neighbor search for spatial network databases. In VLDB, pages 840--851, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. R. Kolahdouzan and C. Shahabi. Alternative solutions for continuous k nearest neighbor queries in spatial network databases. GeoInformatica, 9(4):321--341, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. Mouratidis, M. L. Yiu, D. Papadias, and N. Mamoulis. Continuous nearest neighbor monitoring in road networks. In VLDB, pages 43--54, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Okabe, B. Boots, K. Sugihara, and S. N. Chiu. Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams. Wiley, Chichester, second edition, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Okabe, T. Satoh, T. Furuta, A. Suzuki, and K. Okano. Generalized network Voronoi diagrams: Concepts, computational methods, and applications. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(9):965--994, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. Papadias, J. Zhang, N. Mamoulis, and Y. Tao. Query processing in spatial network databases. In VLDB, pages 802--813, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Russell and P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, second edition, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. H. Samet, J. Sankaranarayanan, and H. Alborzi. Scalable network distance browsing in spatial databases. In SIGMOD, pages 43--54, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Local network Voronoi diagrams

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GIS '10: Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
          November 2010
          566 pages
          ISBN:9781450304283
          DOI:10.1145/1869790

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 November 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader