skip to main content
10.1145/1869983.1869997acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evolution and sustainability of a wildlife monitoring sensor network

Published:03 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

As sensor network technologies become more mature, they are increasingly being applied to a wide variety of applications, ranging from agricultural sensing to cattle, oceanic and volcanic monitoring. Significant efforts have been made in deploying and testing sensor networks resulting in unprecedented sensing capabilities. A key challenge has become how to make these emerging wireless sensor networks more sustainable and easier to maintain over increasingly prolonged deployments.

In this paper, we report the findings from a one year deployment of an automated wildlife monitoring system for analyzing the social co-location patterns of European badgers (Meles meles) residing in a dense woodland environment.

We describe the stages of its evolution cycle, from implementation, deployment and testing, to various iterations of software optimization, followed by hardware enhancements, which in turn triggered the need for further software optimization. We report preliminary descriptive analyses of a subset of the data collected, demonstrating the significant potential our system has to generate new insights into badger behavior. The main lessons learned were: the need to factor in the maintenance costs while designing the system; to look carefully at software and hardware interactions; the importance of a rapid initial prototype deployment (this was key to our success); and the need for continuous interaction with domain scientists which allows for unexpected optimizations.

References

  1. Wavetrend TG 100 Domino Tag. http://www.wavetrend.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Aschoff. Circadian Clocks. North Holland Press, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Barrenetxea, F. Ingelrest, G. Schaefer, M. Vetterli, O. Couach, and M. Parlange. SensorScope: Out-of-the-Box Environmental Monitoring. In Proceedings of IPSN '08, pages 332--343, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Beutel, S. Gruber, A. Hasler, R. Lim, A. Meier, C. Plessl, I. Talzi, L. Thiele, C. Tschudin, M. Woehrle, and M. Yuecel. PermaDAQ: A Scientific Instrument for Precision Sensing and Data Recovery in Environmental Extremes. In Proceedings of IPSN '09, pages 265--276, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10):P10008, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Buettner, G. V. Yee, E. Anderson, and R. Han. X-MAC: A Short Preamble MAC Protocol for Duty-cycled Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of SenSys '06, pages 307--320, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Chatterjea and P. Havinga. An Adaptive and Autonomous Sensor Sampling Frequency Control Scheme for Energy-Efficient Data Acquisition in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of DCOSS'08, pages 60--78, Santorini, Greece, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Durvy, J. Abeillé, P. Wetterwald, C. O'Flynn, B. Leverett, E. Gnoske, M. Vidales, G. Mulligan, N. Tsiftes, N. Finne, and A. Dunkels. Making Sensor Networks IPv6 Ready. In Proceedings of SenSys'08, pages 421--422, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. V. Dyo and C. Mascolo. Efficient Node Discovery in Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of DCOSS '08, pages 60--78, Santorini, Greece, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. Ekici, Y. Gu, and D. Bozdag. Mobility-based Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 44(7):56--62, July 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Gorlick. Turtles to Test Wireless Network, July 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. W. Hui and D. E. Culler. IP is Dead, Long Live IP for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of SenSys '08, pages 15--28, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Jiang, J. Taneja, J. Ortiz, A. Tavakoli, P. Dutta, J. Jeong, D. Culler, P. Levis, and S. Shenker. An Architecture for Energy Management in Wireless Sensor Networks. SIGBED Review, 4(3):31--36, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. L. P. Kaelbling, M. L. Littman, and A. P. Moore. Reinforcement Learning: A Survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4:237--285, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. R. E. Kenward. A Manual for Wildlife Radio Tagging (Biological Techniques). Academic Press, 2 edition, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. W. Macdonald and C. Newman. Population Dynamics of Badgers (Meles meles) in Oxfordshire, U.K.: Numbers, Density and Cohort Life Histories, and a Possible Role of Climate Change in Population Growth. Journal of Zoology, 256(01):121--138, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. D. W. Macdonald, C. Newman, C. D. Buesching, and P. J. Johnson. Male-biased Movement in a High-density Population of the Eurasion Badger (Meles meles). Journal of Mammalogy, pages 1077--1086, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D. W. Macdonald, P. Riordan, and F. Mathews. "Biological Hurdles to the Control of TB in Cattle: A Test of Two Hypotheses Concerning Wildlife to Explain the Failure of Control". Biological Conservation, 131(2):268--286, 2006. Infectious Disease and Mammalian Conservation.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. G. Mainland, D. C. Parkes, and M. Welsh. Decentralized, Adaptive Resource Allocation for Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of NSDI '05, pages 315--328, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2005. USENIX Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Mainwaring, D. Culler, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and J. Anderson. Wireless Sensor Networks for Habitat Monitoring. In Proceedings of WSNA '02, pages 88--97, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. Martinez, J. K. Hart, and R. Ong. Deploying a Wireless Sensor Network in Iceland. In Proceedings of GSN '09, pages 131--137, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. E. Neal and C. Cheeseman. Badgers. Poyser Books, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. C. E. Perkins and P. Bhagwat. Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 24:234--244, October 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. C. Sadler and M. Martonosi. Data Compression Algorithms for Energy-constrained Devices in Delay Tolerant Networks. In ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems (SenSys), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. L. Selavo, A. Wood, Q. Cao, T. Sookoor, H. Liu, A. Srinivasan, Y. Wu, W. Kang, J. Stankovic, D. Young, and J. Porter. LUSTER: Wireless Sensor Network for Environmental Research. In SenSys'07: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 103--116, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. Sikka, P. Corke, P. Valencia, C. Crossman, D. Swain, and G. Bishop-Hurley. Wireless Adhoc Sensor and Actuator Networks on the Farm. In Proceedings of IPSN '06, pages 492--499, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. R. Szewczyk, J. Polastre, A. Mainwaring, and D. Culler. Lessons From A Sensor Network Expedition. In Proceedings of EWSN '04, pages 307--322, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. G. Tolle, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, N. Turner, K. Tu, S. Burgess, T. Dawson, P. Buonadonna, D. Gay, and W. Hong. A macroscope in the redwoods. In SenSys '05: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 51--63, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. G. Werner-Allen, S. Dawson-Haggerty, and M. Welsh. Lance: Optimizing High-resolution Signal Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of SenSys '08, pages 169--182, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. P. Zhang, C. M. Sadler, S. A. Lyon, and M. Martonosi. Hardware Design Experiences in ZebraNet. In Proceedings of SenSys '04, pages 227--238, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evolution and sustainability of a wildlife monitoring sensor network

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SenSys '10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
        November 2010
        461 pages
        ISBN:9781450303446
        DOI:10.1145/1869983

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader