skip to main content
10.1145/1871437.1871561acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personalized search by tag-based user profile and resource profile in collaborative tagging systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increase of resource-sharing web sites such as YouTube1 and Flickr2, personalized search becomes more important and challenging, as users demand higher retrieval quality. To achieve this goal, personalized search needs to take users' personalized profiles and information needs into consideration. Collaborative tagging (also known as folksonomy [11]) systems allow users to annotate resources with their own tags, which provide a simple but powerful way for organizing, retrieving and sharing different types of social resources. In this paper, we examine the limitations of previous tag-based personalized search. To handle these limitations, we propose a new method to model user profiles and resource profiles in a collaborative tagging environment. A novel search method using such users' and resources' profiles is proposed to facilitate the desired personalization in resource search. We implement a prototype system named as FMRS. Experiments using FMRS data set and MovieLens data set show that our proposed method outperforms baseline methods.

References

  1. H. Al-Khalifa and H. Davis. Measuring the semantic value of folksonomies. In Innovations in Information Technology, 2006, pages 1--5, November 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. H. S. Al-Khalifa and H. C. Davis. Exploring the value of folksonomies for creating semantic metadata. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 3(1):13--39, March 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. P. Alex, R. Chirita, S. Costache, S. H, and W. Nejdl. P-tag: Large scale automatic generation of personalized annotation tags for the web. In Proc. of the 16th Intl. World Wide Web Conf, pages 8--12, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Bao, G. Xue, X. Wu, Y. Yu, B. Fei, and Z. Su. Optimizing web search using social annotations. In WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 501--510. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. Bischoff, C. S. Firan, W. Nejdl, and R. Paiu. Can all tags be used for search? In CIKM '08, pages 193--202. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Cattuto, D. Benz, A. Hotho, and G. Stumme. Semantic grounding of tag relatedness in social bookmarking systems. In ISWC '08: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on The Semantic Web, pages 615--631, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. A. Chirita, C. S. Firan, and W. Nejdl. Personalized query expansion for the web. In SIGIR '07, pages 7--14. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. A. Chirita, W. Nejdl, R. Paiu, and C. Kohlschütter. Using odp metadata to personalize search. In SIGIR '05, pages 178--185, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Diederich and T. Iofciu. Finding communities of practice from user profiles based on folksonomies. In Proceedings of TEL-CoPs'06, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Z. Dou, R. Song, and J.-R. Wen. A large-scale evaluation and analysis of personalized search strategies. In WWW '07, pages 581--590. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. A. Golder and B. A. Huberman. The structure of collaborative tagging systems. CoRR, abs/cs/0508082, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. A. Golder and B. A. Huberman. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Inf. Sci., 32(2):198--208, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H.-I. J. J. J. G. Kim, H. N. User preference modeling from positive contents for personalized recommendation. Corruble, V., Takeda, M., Suzuki, E.(eds.) DS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), 4755:116--126, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. man Au Yeung, N. Gibbins, and N. Shadbolt. A study of user profile generation from folksonomies. In P. Dolog, M. Krötzsch, S. Schaffert, and D. Vrandecic, editors, SWKM, volume 356 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Markines, C. Cattuto, F. Menczer, D. Benz, A. Hotho, andG. Stumme. Evaluating similarity measures for emergentsemantics of social tagging. In WWW '09, pages 641--650. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. E. Michlmayr. Learning user profiles from tagging data and leveraging them for personal(ized) information access. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Tagging and Metadata for Social Information Organization, WWW2007, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. G. Noll and C. Meinel. Web search personalization via social bookmarking and tagging. In ISWC'07/ASWC'07: Proceedings of the 6th international The semantic web and 2nd Asian conference on Asian semantic web conference, pages 367--380, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. Pitkow, H. Schütze, T. Cass, R. Cooley, D. Turnbull, A. Edmonds, E. Adar, and T. Breuel. Personalized search. Commun. ACM, 45(9):50--55, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Shepitsen, J. Gemmell, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Personalized recommendation in social tagging systems using hierarchical clustering. In RecSys '08, pages 259--266. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. Sugiyama, K. Hatano, and M. Yoshikawa. Adaptive web search based on user profile constructed without any effort from users. In WWW '04, pages 675--684. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. D. Vallet, I. Cantador, and J. M. Jose. Personalizing web search with folksonomy-based user and document profiles. In Advances in Information Retrieval, 32nd European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2010, Milton Keynes, UK, March 28-31, 2010. Proceedings, pages 420--431, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Xu, S. Bao, B. Fei, Z. Su, and Y. Yu. Exploring folksonomy for personalized search. In SIGIR '08: Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 155--162, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Personalized search by tag-based user profile and resource profile in collaborative tagging systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '10: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
        October 2010
        2036 pages
        ISBN:9781450300995
        DOI:10.1145/1871437

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 October 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader