Why give away something for nothing? Investigating virtual goods pricing and permission strategies

Abstract

With the rapid increase of virtual goods created for virtual world exchanges and the record growth of user-to-user transactions in these in-world economies, an important question is how a creator sets prices for a virtual good so as to maximize her profit from her creation. Virtual goods share similar economic properties (such as substantial production cost and negligible marginal cost) with other types of digital goods. However, one aspect that distinguishes a virtual good is that consumers in a virtual world may want to use multiple copies of the identical good at the same time, and such simultaneous use of multiple copies of the identical good increases a consumer's utility. In this research, we focus on the COPY permission of virtual goods. We develop an economic model to examine under what conditions the COPY permission setting leads to the highest profit for the creator of a virtual good, and what the pricing strategies are in a dynamic setting when such permission choices are present. Theoretical and practical implications of the research are discussed.

References

1. Ali, A. M. A., Vander Spiegel, J., Mueller, P., Haentjens, G., and Berman, J. 1999. An Acoustic-Phonetic feature based system for Automatic Phoneme Recognition in Continuous Speech. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS'99). 118--121.
2. Bagnoli, M., Salant S. W., and Swierzbinski, J. E. 1989. Durable-Goods monopoly with discrete demand. J. Polit. Econom. 97, 6, 1459--1478.
3. Bakos, Y. and Brynjolfsson, E. 2000. Bundling and competition on the Internet. Market. Sci. 19, 1, 63--82.
4. Bakos, Y. and Brynjolfsson, E. 1999. Bundling information goods: Pricing, profit and efficiency. Manag. Sci. 45, 12, 1613--1630.
5. Bakos, Y., Brynjolfsson, E., and Lichtman. D. 1999. Shared information goods. J. Law Econom. 42, 1, 117--156.
6. Bass, F. 1969. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Manag. Sci. 15, 5, 215--227.
7. Belleflamme, P. 2002. Pricing information goods in the presence of copying. http://ssrn.com/abstract=333323
8. Belleflamme, P. and Picard, P. 2007. Piracy and competition. J. Econom. Manag. Strategy 16, 2, 351--383.
9. Besanko, D. and Winston, W. L. 1990. Optimal price skimming by a monopolist facing rational consumers. Manag. Sci. 36, 5, 555--567.
10. Besen, S. M. and Kirby, S. N. 1989. Private copying, appropriability, and optimal copying royalties. J. Law Econom. 32, 255--286.
11. Bhargava, H. K. and Choudhary, V. 2001. Information goods and vertical differentiation. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 18, 2, 89--106.
12. Bhargava, H. K. and Choudhary, V. 2008. When is versioning optimal for information goods? Manag. Sci. 54, 5, 1029--1035.
13. Bhattacharjee, S. Gopal, R. D. Lertwachara, K., and Marsden, J. R. 2006. Consumer search and retailer strategies in the presence of online music sharing. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 23, 1, 129--159.
14. Chellappa, R. and Shivendu, S. 2005. Managing piracy: Pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertical segmented markets. Inform. Syst. Res. 16, 4, 400--417.
15. Chen, Y. and Png, I. 2003. Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Inform. Syst. Res. 14, 1, 107--123.
16. Cheng, H. K. and Liu, Y. 2008. Software free trial: How long is optimal? http://ssrn.com/abstract=1013459
17. Cheng, H. K. and Tang, Q. C. 2010. Free trial or no free trial: Optimal software product design with network effects. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 205, 2, 437--447.
18. Conner, K. and Rumelt, R. 1991. Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Manag. Sci. 37, 2, 125--139.
19. Gopal, R. D., Bhattacharjee, S. and Sanders, G. L. 2006. Do artists benefit from online music sharing? J. Bus. 79, 3, 1503--1534.
20. Hanssens, D. M., Parsons, L. J. and Schultz, R. L. 2003. Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis 2nd Ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
21. Kappe, F. 2009. An interoperability framework for the free trade of virtual goods and services across virtual worlds. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/cf/document.cfm?doc_id=9411
22. Khouja, M. and Smith, M. A. 2007. Optimal pricing for information goods with piracy and saturation effect. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 176, 1, 482--497.
23. Milgrom, P. R., and Roberts, J. D. 1992. Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
24. Mørch von der Fehr, N.-H. and Kühn, K.-U. 1995. Coase versus pacman: Who eats whom in the durable-goods monopoly? J. Polit. Econ. 103, 4, 785--812.
25. Oestreicher-Singer, G. and Sundararajan, A. 2006. Are digital rights valuable? Theory and evidence from ebook pricing. CeDER Working Paper No. 06-01. http://ssrn.com/abstract=871243
26. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. 1998. Versioning: The smart way to sell information.Harvard Bus. Rev., 106--144.
27. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business School Press, Camabridge, MA.
28. Simon, H. 1989. Price Management. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
29. Sundararajan, A. 2004a. Managing digital piracy pricing and protection. Inform. Syst. Res. 15, 3, 287--308.
30. Sundararajan, A. 2004b. Non-Linear pricing of information goods. Manag. Sci. 50, 12, 1660--1673.
31. Varian, H. 1997. Versioning information goods. InThe Economics of Digital Information. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Varian, H. 2000. Buying, sharing and renting information goods. J. Industr. Econ. 48, 4, 473--488.
33. Verhulst, P. F. 1838. Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement. Correspondance Mathematique et Physique 10, 113--121.
34. Wu, S. Y., Hitt, L. M., Chen, P. Y., and Anandalingam, G. 2008. Customized bundle pricing for information goods: A nonlinear mixed-integer programming approach. Manag. Sci. 54, 3, 608--622.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Law, social and behavioral sciences

• Computing methodologies

  • Modeling and simulation

    • Simulation theory

      • Systems theory

• Mathematics of computing

  • Information theory