skip to main content
10.1145/1877808.1877812acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

3D shape retrieval based on best view selection

Published:25 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe the preliminary results of an ongoing work on content-based 3D retrieval, based on the selection of the best view of 3D objects according to semantic criteria. Experiments show that a single view is sufficient to achieve good performance, if it is the view in which the relevant shape features are maximally exposed.

References

  1. 3d.csie.ntu.edu.tw/dynamic/3dretrieval/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. F. Ansary, M. Daudi, and J.-P. Vandeborre. A Bayesian 3D search engine using adaptive views clustering. IEEE Trans. Multimedia, 9(1):78--88, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Attene and S. Biasotti. Shape retrieval contest 2008: Stability of watertight models. In Proc. IEEE SMI 2008, pages 219--220, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Attene, B. Falcidieno, and M. Spagnuolo. Hierarchical mesh segmentation based on fitting primitives. The Visual Computer, 22:181--193, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. Blanz, M. Tarr, and H. Bülthoff. What object attributes determine canonical views? Perception, 28:575--599, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. B. Bustos, D. Keim, D. Saupe, T. Schrek, and D. Vranic. Feature-based similarity search in 3D object databases. ACM CSUR, 37(4):345--387, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Catalano et al. FOCUS K3D Road map for future research. Technical report, 2010. www.focusk3d.eu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Cerri, M. Ferri, and D. Giorgi. Retrieval of trademark images by means of size functions. Graphical Models, 68(5):451--471, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Chen, M. Ouhyoung, X. Tian, and Y. Shen. On visual similarity based 3D model retrieval. Computer Graphics and Applications, (22):223--232, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Cyr and B. Kimia. 3D object recognition using shape similarity-based aspect graph. In Proc. ICCV, volume 1, pages 254--261, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. d’Amico, P. Frosini, and C. Landi. Using matching distance in size theory: A survey. Int. J. Imag. Syst. Tech., 16(5):154--161, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Del Bimbo and P. Pala. Content-based retrieval of 3D models. ACM T. Multim. Comput., 2(1), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Frosini. A distance for similarity classes of submanifolds of a Euclidean space. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 42:407--416, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Funkhouser, P. Min, M. Kazhdan, J. Chen, A. Halderman, and D. Dobkin. A search engine for 3D models. ACM Trans. on Graphics, 22(1):83--105, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Giorgi, P. Frosini, M. Spagnuolo, and B. Falcidieno. Multilevel relevance feedback for 3d shape retrieval. In Proc. EG 3DOR, pages 45--52, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Golovinskiy and T. Funkhouser. Consistent segmentation of 3D models. Comput. Graph., 33(3):262--269, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Hilaga, Y. Shinagawa, T. Kohmura, and T. L. Kunii. Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, pages 203--212, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Ion et al. Matching 2D and 3D articulated shapes using eccentricity. Technical report, 2010. hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/36/50/19/PDF/ijcv ecc matching.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Laga. Semantics-driven approach for automatic selection of best views of 3d shapes. In Proc. EG 3DOR, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. H. Lee, A. Varshney, and D. W. Jacobs. Mesh saliency. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, pages 659--666, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. Marcrini, A. Shokoufandeh, S. Dickenson, K. Siddiqi, and S. Zucker. View based 3-D object recognition using shock graphs. In Proc. IEEE ICPR, volume 3, pages 24--28, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Mortara, G. Patanè, M. Spagnuolo, B. Falcidieno, and J. Rossignac. Blowing bubbles for multi-scale analysis and decomposition of triangle meshes. Algorithmica, 38(1):227--248, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. Mortara, G. Patanè, M. Spagnuolo, B. Falcidieno, and J. Rossignac. Plumber: a method for a multi-scale decomposition of 3d shapes into tubular primitives and bodies. In Proc. Solid Modeling, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Mortara and M. Spagnuolo. Semantics-driven best view of 3D shapes. Comput. Graph., 33(3):280--290, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. T. Napoléon and H. Sahbi. From 2D Photography Silhouettes to 3D Object Retrieval: Contributions and Benchmarking. EURASIP J. Image and Video Processing, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. O. Polonsky, G. Patanè, S. Biasotti, C. Gotsman, and M. Spagnuolo. What’s in an image? The Visual Computer, 21(8--10):840--847, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. P. Shilane and T. Funkhouser. Distinctive regions of 3d surfaces. ACM ToG, 26:2007, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S.Manay, D. Cremers, B.-W. Hong, A. Jezzi, and S. Soatto. Integral invariants for shape matching. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 28(10):1602--1618, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. D. Zhang and G. Lu. An integrated approach to shape based image retrieval. In Proc. ACCV, pages 652--657, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. 3D shape retrieval based on best view selection

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          3DOR '10: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on 3D object retrieval
          October 2010
          96 pages
          ISBN:9781450301602
          DOI:10.1145/1877808

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 October 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader