skip to main content
10.1145/1878431.1878435acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Building-level occupancy data to improve ARIMA-based electricity use forecasts

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The energy use of an office building is likely to correlate with the number of occupants, and thus knowing occupancy levels should improve energy use forecasts. To gather data related to total building occupancy, wireless sensors were installed in a three-storey building in eastern Ontario, Canada comprising laboratories and 81 individual work spaces. Contact closure sensors were placed on various doors, PIR motion sensors were placed in the main corridor on each floor, and a carbon-dioxide sensor was positioned in a circulation area. In addition, we collected data on the number of people who had logged in to the network on each day, network activity, electrical energy use (total building, and chilling plant only), and outdoor temperature. We developed an ARIMAX model to forecast the power demand of the building in which a measure of building occupancy was a significant independent variable and increased the model accuracy. The results are promising, and suggest that further work on a larger and more typical office building would be beneficial. If building operators have a tool that can accurately forecast the energy use of their building several hours ahead they can better respond to utility price signals, and play a fuller role in the coming Smart Grid.

References

  1. N. Gershenfeld, S. Samouhos, and B. Nordman. Intelligent infrastructure for energy efficiency. Science, pages 1086--1088, February 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Q. Zhou, S. Wang, and F. Xiao X. Xu. A grey-box model of next-day building thermal load prediction for energy-efficient control. International Journal of Energy Research, 32:1418--1431, December 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. H. Neto and F. A. S. Fiorellia. Comparison between detailed model simulation and artificial neural network for forecasting building energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 40:2169--2176, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. J. Hoffman. Peak demand control in commercial buildings with target peak adjustment based on load forecasting. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, volume 2, pages 1292--1296, September 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. A. Piette, D. S. Watson, N. Motegi, and N. Bourassa. Findings from the 2004 fully automated demand response tests in large facilities. Technical Report LBNL Report Number 58178, 2004. Report for the PIER Demand Response Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. R. Newsham and B. Birt. Demand-responsive lighting: a field study. Leukos, 6(3):203--225, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D. C. Montgomery, C. L. Jennings, and M. Kulahci. Introduction to Time Series Analysis and Forecasting. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. UC 2010. Notation for ARIMA models. http://www.uc.edu/sashtml/ets/chap30/sect13.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. L. Loveday and C. Craggs. Stochastic modelling of temperatures for a full-scale occupied building zone subject to natural random influences. Applied Energy, 45:295--312, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. G. J. Rios-Moreno, M. Trejo-Perea, R. Castaneda-Miranda, V. M. Hernandez-Guzman, and G. Herrera-Ruiz. Modelling temperature in intelligent buildings by means of autoregressive models. Automation in Construction, 16:713--722, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G. Lowry, F. U. Bianeyin, and N. Shah. Seasonal autoregressive modelling of water and fuel consumptions in buildings. Applied Energy, 84:542--552, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Kimabra, S. Kuroso, R. Endo, K. Kamimura, T. Matsuba, and A. Yamada. On-line prediction for load profile of an air-conditioning system. ASHRAE Transactions, 101(2):198--207, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. R. Newsham and B. Birt. Detecting total building occupancy for more efficient operation. Technical Report RR-304, National Research Council - Institute for Research in Construction, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Kawashima, C. E. Dorgan, and J. W. Mitchell. Hourly thermal load prediction for the next 24 hours by arima, ewma, lr, and an artificial neural network. ASHRAE Transactions, 101(1):186--200, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Hay and A. Rice. The case for apportionment. In BuildSys '09: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, pages 13--18, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Building-level occupancy data to improve ARIMA-based electricity use forecasts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      BuildSys '10: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Building
      November 2010
      93 pages
      ISBN:9781450304580
      DOI:10.1145/1878431

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 November 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate148of500submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader