ABSTRACT
Mobile phones are becoming more and more widely used nowadays, and people do not use the phone only for communication: there is a wide variety of phone applications allowing users to select those that fit their needs. Aggregated over time, application usage patterns exhibit not only what people are consistently interested in but also the way in which they use their phones, and can help improving phone design and personalized services. This work aims at mining automatically usage patterns from apps data recorded continuously with smartphones. A new probabilistic framework for mining usage patterns is proposed. Our methodology involves the design of a bag-of-apps model that robustly represents level of phone usage over specific times of the day, and the use of a probabilistic topic model that jointly discovers patterns of usage over multiple applications and describes users as mixtures of such patterns. Our framework is evaluated using 230 000+ hours of real-life app phone log data, demonstrates that relevant patterns of usage can be extracted, and is objectively validated on a user retrieval task with competitive performance.
- R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993--1022, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, A. Parker, N. Ramanathan, S. Reddy, and M. B. Srivastava. Participatory sensing. In WSW at Sensys, pages 117--134, 2006.Google Scholar
- F. D. Davis. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3):319--339, September 1989.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Eagle, A. S. Pentland, and D. Lazer. Mobile phone data for inferring social network structure. In H. Liu, J. J. Salerno, and M. J. Young, editors, Social Computing, Behavioral Modeling, and Prediction, pages 79--88. Springer US, 2008.Google Scholar
- N. Eagle and A. (Sandy) Pentland. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 10(4):255--268, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Farrahi and D. Gatica-Perez. What did you do today?: discovering daily routines from large-scale mobile data. In Proc. MM, pages 849--852, New York, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. R. Gilks. Markov Chain Monte Carlo In Practice. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1999.Google Scholar
- I. Guyon, V. Lemaire, M. Boullé, G. Dror, and D. Vogel. Design and analysis of the kdd cup 2009: fast scoring on a large orange customer database. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11(2):68--76, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 50--57, New York, 1999. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S.-J. Hong, K. Y. Tam, and J. Kim. Mobile data service fuels the desire for uniqueness. Communications of the ACM, 49(9):89--94, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Jeon, V. Lavrenko, and R. Manmatha. Automatic image annotation and retrieval using cross-media relevance models. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 119--126, New York, 2003. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Kiukkonen, J. Blom, O. Dousse, D. Gatica-Perez, and J. Laurila. Towards rich mobile phone datasets: Lausanne data collection campaign. In Proc. ICPS, Berlin, 2010.Google Scholar
- R. Kwok. Phoning in data. Nature, pages 959--961, 2009.Google Scholar
- D. Lazer, A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A. Barabasi, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Guttmann, T. Jebara, G. King, M. Macy, D. Roy, and M. V. Alstyne. Computational social science. Science, 323(5915):721--723, 2/6/2009 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Mika, O. Antti, and E. Nathan. Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological Methods Research, 37(3):426--454, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nielsen. Critical mass: The worldwide state of the mobile web. Available at http://www.nielsenmobile.com/documents/CriticalMass.pdf, July 2008.Google Scholar
- Nokia. Smartphone 360 study: Responding to what the user wants and needs. Press Release, Oct. 2007 available at http://www.nokia.com/NOKIA_COM_1/Press/twwln/press_kit/Nokia_Smartphone360_study_Press_Backgrounder_October_2007.pdf.Google Scholar
- M. Raento, A. Oulasvirta, R. Petit, and H. Toivonen. Contextphone: A prototyping platform for context-aware mobile applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4(2):51--59, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Rosen-Zvi, T. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, and P. Smyth. The author-topic model for authors and documents. In Proc. UAI, pages 487--494, Arlington, Virginia, United States, 2004. AUAI Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Verkasalo. Handset-based analysis of mobile service usage. Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, 2009.Google Scholar
- H. Verkasalo, C. López-Nicolás, F. J. Molina-Castillo, and H. Bouwman. Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications. Telematics and Informatics, 27(3):242--255, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Zheng, D. C. M. Jr, and X. Lu. Identifying biological concepts from a protein-related corpus with a probabilistic topic model. BMC Bioinformatics, 7:58, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Web-based hybrid mobile apps: state of the practice and research opportunities
MOBILESoft '16: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and SystemsThis paper describes the contents of a tutorial on web-based hybrid mobile apps. Nowadays millions of mobile apps are downloaded and used all over the world. Mobile apps are distributed via different app stores like Google Play Store, the Apple App ...
Comments