skip to main content
research-article

ImpAct: Immersive haptic stylus to enable direct touch and manipulation for surface computing

Published:30 December 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article explores direct touch and manipulation techniques for surface computing environments using a specialized haptic force feedback stylus, called ImpAct, which can dynamically change its effective length and equipped with sensors to calculate its orientation in world coordinates. When a user pushes it against a touch screen, the physical stylus shrinks and a rendered projection of the stylus is drawn inside the screen, giving the illusion that it is submerged in the display device. Once the users can see the stylus immersed in the digital world below the screen, he or she can manipulate and interact with the virtual objects with active haptic sensations. In this article, ImpAct's functionality, design, and prototype applications are described in detail with relevance to the concept of direct touch, giving special attention to novel interaction scenarios and design challenges. Furthermore, a technical evaluation was done to study ImpAct's accuracy and controlability and the results presented. This article concludes by discussing ImpAct's current limitations and future perspectives as a direct touch and manipulation tool.

References

  1. Ando, H., Miki, T., Inami, M., and Maeda. T. 2002. The nail-mounted tactile display for the behavior modeling. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2002 Conference. Abstracts and Applications (SIGGRAPH'02), ACM, New York, 264--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bi, X., Moscovich, T., Ramos, G., Balakrishnan, R., and Hinckley, K. 2008. An exploration of pen rolling for pen-based interaction. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'08), ACM, New York, 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Driver, J. and Spence, C. 1998. Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2, 7, 254--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fitzmaurice, G. W., Ishii, H., and Buxton, W. A. S. 1995. Bricks: Laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95), ACM, New York, 442--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gray, R. and Tan, H. Z. 2002. Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision. Experimental Brain Res. 145, 1, 50--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Han, J. Y. 2005. Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'05), ACM, New York, 145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hirsch, M., Lanman, D., Holtzman, H., and Raskar, R. 2009. BiDi screen: A thin, depth-sensing LCD for 3D interaction using light fields. In Proceedings SIGGRAPH Asia'09, ACM, New York. 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kamuro, S., Minamizawa, K., Kawakami, N., and Tachi. S. 2009. Pen de touch. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Emerging Technologies Conference, ACM, New York, 1--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kennett, S., Taylor-Clarke, M., and Haggard, P. 2001. Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biol. 11, 15, 1188--1191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kyung, K.-U. and Lee, J.-Y. 2008. Wubi-pen: Windows graphical user interface interacting with haptic feedback stylus. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 New Tech Demos, ACM, New York, 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lapides, P., Sharlin, E., Sousa, M. C., and Streit, L. 2006. The 3d tractus: A three-dimensional drawing board. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP'06), IEEE. Washington, D.C., 169--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lee, J. C., Dietz, P. H., Leigh, D. W. S., Yerazunis, and Hudson, S. E. 2004. Haptic pen: A tactile feedback stylus for touch screens. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'04), ACM, New York, 291--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lee, S., Buxton, W., and Smith, K. C. 1985. A multi-touch three-dimensional touch-sensitive tablet. SIGCHI Bull. 16, 4, 21--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Massie, T. H. 1996. Initial haptic explorations with the phantom: Virtual touch through point interaction. MS dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Minsky, M., Ming, O.-y., Steele, O., Brooks, F. P., Jr., and M. Behensky, M. 1990. Feeling and seeing: Issues in force display. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 24, 2, 235--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Minsky, M. D. R. 1995. Computational haptics: The Sandpaper system for synthesizing texture for a force-feedback display. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Polanyim, M. 1959. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramos, G., Boulos, M., and Balakrishnan, R. 2004. Pressure widgets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'04), ACM, New York, 487--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rekimoto, J. 2002. Smartskin: An infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'02), ACM, New York, 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sato, T., Mamiya, H., Koike, and Fukuchi, K. 2009. Photoelastictouch: Transparent rubbery tangible interface using an and photoelasticity. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'09), ACM, New York, 43--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sinclair, M. 1997. The haptic lens. In ACM SIGGRAPH 97: Visual Proceedings, ACM, New York, 179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. So, E., Zhang, H., and Sheng Guan, Y. 1999. Sensing contact with analog resistive technology. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 2, IEEE, Washington, D.C., 806--811.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Suzuki, Y., Misue, K., and Tanaka, J. 2007. Stylus enhancement to enrich interaction with computers. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI'07), Springer, Berlin, 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tian, F., Xu, L., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Setlur, V., and Dai, G. 2008. Tilt menu: Using the 3d orientation information of pen devices to extend the selection capability of pen-based user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08), ACM, New York, 1371--1380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wang, F., Cao, X., Ren, X., and Irani, P. 2009. Detecting and leveraging finger orientation for interaction with direct-touch surfaces. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'09), ACM, New York, 23--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wang, F. and Ren, X. 2009. Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09), ACM, New York, 1063--1072 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wilson, A. D., Izadi, S., Hilliges, O., Garcia-Mendoza, A., and Kirk, D. 2008. Bringing physics to the surface. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'08), ACM, New York, 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ImpAct: Immersive haptic stylus to enable direct touch and manipulation for surface computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Computers in Entertainment
      Computers in Entertainment   Volume 8, Issue 2
      Special Issue: Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology
      December 2010
      117 pages
      EISSN:1544-3574
      DOI:10.1145/1899687
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 December 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader