Clifford Nass
- 1.Turkle, S. The Second Self Computers and the Human Spirit. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY, 1984. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Rafaeli, S. Interacting with Media: Para-social Interaction and Real Interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1985.Google Scholar
- 3.Cooley, C. H. Social process. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 1966.Google Scholar
- 4.Nass, C., and Steuer, J. Anthropomorphism, Agency, & Ethop~eia: Computers as Social Actors. Human Communication Research, 19(4) (June 1993), 504-527.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 5.Steuer, J. It's Only Talk: Speech as A Possible Determinant of the Social Categorization of Computers. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, 1990.Google Scholar
- 6.Nass, C., S teuer, J., Tauber, E., and Reeder, H., Anthropomorphism, Agency, & Ethopoeia: Computers as Social Actors. Presented at INTERCHI '93; Conference of the ACM / SIGCHI and the IFIP; Amsterdam, the Netherlands ~ April, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Nass, C., S teuer, J., Henriksen, L., and Dryer, D. C. Machines, Social Attributions, and Ethop0eia: Performance Assessments of Computers Subsequent to "Self-" or "Other-" Evaluations. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, In Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Winograd, T. and Flore~, F. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.Green, N. Can Computers Have Genders? Paper presented to the Communication and Technology Division, Conference of the International Communication Association; Washington, DC ~ May, 1993.Google Scholar
- 10.Sethuraman, S. S. Communicator, Programmer, or Independent Actor: What Are Computers? Paper presented to the Communication and Technology Division, Conference of the International Communication Association; Washington, DC B May, 1993.Google Scholar
- 11.Laurel, B. Interface Agents: Metaphors with Character. In The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Oren, T., Salomon, G., Kreitman, K., & Don, A. Guides: Characterizing the Interface. In The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Computers are social actors
Recommendations
How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations
Testing the assumption that more anthropomorphic (human-like) computer representations elicit more social responses from people, a between-participants experiment (N=168) manipulated 12 computer agents to represent four levels of anthropomorphism: low, ...
The effect of voice cuing on releasing Chinese speech from informational masking
In a cocktail-party environment, human listeners are able to use perceptual-level and cognitive-level cues to segregate the attended target speech from other background conversations. At the cognitive level, priming the listener with part of the target ...
Smartphones as Social Actors? Social dispositional factors in assessing anthropomorphism
Smartphones are prominently personalized and personified in our society. Existing Computers as Social Actors (CASA) studies about anthropomorphism and social interactions have focused on how to identify and elicit positive anthropomorphic effects but ...
Comments