ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Distributing a search tree among a growing number of processors
Full text PdfPdf (1.23 MB)
Source International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 1994 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Pages: 265 - 276  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-639-5
Also published in ...
Authors
Brigitte Kröll  Institut für Theoretische Informatik, ETH Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Swizerland
Peter Widmayer  Institut für Theoretische Informatik, ETH Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Swizerland
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/191839.191891
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Databases are growing steadily, and distributed computer systems are more and more easily available. This provides an opportunity to satisfy the increasingly tighter efficiency requirements by means of distributed data structures. The design and analysis of these structures under efficiency aspects, however, has not yet been studied sufficiently. To our knowledge, a single scalable, distributed data structure has been proposed so far. It is a distributed variant of linear hashing with uncontrolled splits, and, as a consequence, performs efficiently for data distributions that are close to uniform, but not necessarily for others. In addition, it does not support queries that refer to the linear order of keys, such as nearest neighbor or range queries. We propose a distributed search tree that avoids these problems, since it inherits desirable properties from non-distributed trees. Our experiments show that our structure does indeed combine a guarantee for good storage space utilization with high query efficiency. Nevertheless, we feel that further research in the area of scalable, distributed data structures is dearly needed; it should eventually lead to a body of knowledge that is comparable with the non-distributed, classical data structures field.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
C.S. Ellis: Distributed data structures: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Computing, Vol. C-34, No. 12, 1985, 1178- 1185.
 
3
E. Gudes, E. Shapiro: A parallel B-tree process structure, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel Technical Report CS 89-06, 1989.
4
5
 
6
7
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
H. Sehwetman: CSIM Reference Manual, Revision 16, Technical Report, MCC, Austin, Texas, USA. 1992
 
13
W. E. Weihl, P. Wang: Multi-version memory: Software cache management for concurrent B-trees, Proc. 2nd IEE-# Symp. Parallel and Distributed Processing, 650

CITED BY  11
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Brigitte Kröll: colleagues
Peter Widmayer: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: