skip to main content
10.1145/1925059.1925090acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessccgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Geometry and image based view quality comparison for 3D models

Published:13 May 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work we present image-based approach to the best view selection for 3D objects. The proposed method is based on entropy measured in image domain. Several 3D models are used in the experiment. The results are compared to the well-known geometrical method based on perspective frustum entropy, a special case of viewpoint entropy.

References

  1. Cernekova, Z., Pitas, I., and Nikou, C. 2006. Information theory-based shot cut/fade detection and video summarization. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 16, 1, 82--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Christie, M., Olivier, P., and Normand, J.-M. 2008. Camera control in computer graphics. Comput. Graph. Forum 27, 8, 2197--2218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cover, T. M., and Thomas, J. A. 1991. Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Grossman, J. P., and Dally, W. J. 1998. Point sample rendering. In In Rendering Techniques 98, Springer-Verlag, 181--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kamada, T., and Kawai, S. 1988. A simple method for computing general position in displaying three-dimensional objects. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 41, 1, 43--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lischinski, D., and Rappoport, A. 1998. Image-based rendering for non-diffuse synthetic scenes. In Rendering Techniques '98, Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop in Vienna, Austria, June 29 - July 1, 1998, Springer, 301--314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. McMillan, L., and Bishop, G. 1995. Plenoptic modeling: an image-based rendering system. In SIGGRAPH '95: Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, 39--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nakagawa, M., Takata, M., and Joe, K. 2006. Automatic viewpoint selection for a visualization i/f in a pse. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA, 100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Papoulis, A. 1991. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Plemenos, D., and Benayada, M. 1996. Intelligent display in scene modeling. new techniques to automatically compute good views. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Graphics and Vision (GraphiCon)'96, St Petersbourg (Russia).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Plemenos, D., and Sokolov, D. 2006. Intelligent scene display and exploration. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Graphics and Vision (GraphiCon)'2006, Novosibirsk (Russia).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Polonsky, O., Patanè, G., Biasotti, S., Gotsman, C., and Spagnuolo, M. 2005. What's in an image? The Visual Computer 21, 8--10, 840--847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sbert, M., Plemenos, D., Feixas, M., and González, F. 2005. Viewpoint quality: Measures and applications. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Aesthetics, Eurographics Association, 185--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sokolov, D., Plemenos, D., and Tamine, K. 2006. Methods and data structures for virtual world exploration. The Visual Computer 22, 7, 506--516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Vázquez, P.-P., and Sbert, M. 2002. Automatic keyframe selection for high-quality image-based walkthrough animation using viewpoint entropy. In Proceedings of the 10-th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision (WSCG)'2002, 461--468.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Vázquez, P.-P., Feixas, M., Sbert, M., and Heidrich, W. 2001. Viewpoint selection using viewpoint entropy. In Proceedings of the Vision Modeling and Visualization Conference 2001, Aka GmbH, ACM, 273--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Vázquez, P.-P., Feixas, M., Sbert, M., and Llobet, A. 2002. Viewpoint entropy: a new tool for obtaining good views of molecules. In Proceedings of the symposium on Data Visualisation 2002, Eurographics Association, 183--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Geometry and image based view quality comparison for 3D models

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            SCCG '10: Proceedings of the 26th Spring Conference on Computer Graphics
            May 2010
            180 pages
            ISBN:9781450305587
            DOI:10.1145/1925059

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 May 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate42of81submissions,52%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader