ABSTRACT
Summary reports are the periodic assemblings of text, numbers, and other data, drawn from diverse sources to present a picture of some aspect of an organization's state. They have become ubiquitous in organizations with the advent of computers, but are not always as useful as their readers would like them to be. This paper focuses on the meaning-making work that report contributors and readers must do in order for reports to be useful and presents some examples drawn from everyday interactions in a business unit of a large corporation. The paper uses these examples as a foundation for asking what it might mean to purposefully support meaning-making in organizational reporting.
- 1.Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Mosher, A., and Swenton- Wall, P. Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka (Eds.) Participatory Design Principles and Practices (pp. 123- 155). Lawrence Erlbaum, HiUsdale, NJ, 1993.Google Scholar
- 2.Bolinger, D. Aspects of Language, 2nd ed. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
- 3.Brun-Cottan, F. Between Us: Competitive- Cooperation, Networking, and Other Hollywood Development Job-Finding Practices in Conversational Interaction. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 1988.Google Scholar
- 4.Garfinkle, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1967.Google Scholar
- 5.Katzenberg, B., and Piela, P. Work language analysis and the naming problem. Communications of the ACM 36, 4 (June 1993), 86-92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar
- 7.March, J. Ambiguity and accounting: The elusive link between information and decision-making. In J. March (Ed.) Decisions and Organizations (pp. 384-408). Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
- 8.Moerman, M. Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1988.Google Scholar
- 9.Rosch, E., and Mervis, C. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7, 573-605.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10.Sacks, H. Lecture 6: The MIR membership categorization device. In G. Jefferson (Ed.) Lectures on Conversation. Volume I. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA, 1992.Google Scholar
- 11.Schegloff, E. Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. Collier-Macmillan Limited., New York, 1972.Google Scholar
- 12.Wenger, E. Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (In preparation). Available as Communities of Practice. Working Paper, Palo Alto" Institute for Research on Learning 1993 (2550 Hanover St., Palo Alto, CA 94304).Google Scholar
- 13.Wooffitt, R. On the analysis of interaction: An introduction to conversation analysis. In P. Luff, N. Gilbert and D. Frohlich (Eds.) Computers and Conversation (pp. 7-38). Academic Press, London, 1990.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Meaning-making in the creation of useful summary reports
Recommendations
A theory of meaning
''Meaning'' is a key concept for understanding a variety of processes in living systems. However, due to its elusive nature and ''subjective'' appearance it has been neglected by information science. In this paper, I outline a theory of meaning and try ...
Making sense of the past
This paper reports the findings of a study of the information practices of archaeologists, students and volunteers undertaking an excavation in the field. Conceptually, the study was guided by a social constructionist and practice-theoretical ...
Moving beyond the mirror: relational and performative meaning making in human–robot communication
AbstractCurrent research in human–robot interaction often focuses on rendering communication between humans and robots more ‘natural’ by designing machines that appear and behave humanlike. Communication, in this human-centric approach, is often ...
Comments