skip to main content
10.1145/1935701.1935712acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Midas: a declarative multi-touch interaction framework

Published:22 January 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the past few years, multi-touch user interfaces emerged from research prototypes into mass market products. This evolution has been mainly driven by innovative devices such as Apple's iPhone or Microsoft's Surface tabletop computer. Unfortunately, there seems to be a lack of software engineering abstractions in existing multi-touch development frameworks. Many multi-touch applications are based on hard-coded procedural low level event processing. This leads to proprietary solutions with a lack of gesture extensibility and cross-application reusability. We present Midas, a declarative model for the definition and detection of multi-touch gestures where gestures are expressed via logical rules over a set of input facts. We highlight how our rule-based language approach leads to improvements in gesture extensibility and reusability. Last but not least, we introduce JMidas, an instantiation of Midas for the Java programming language and describe how JMidas has been applied to implement a number of innovative multi-touch gestures.

References

  1. F. P. Brooks, Jr. No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering. IEEE Computer, 20(4):10--19, April 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. F. Echtler and G. Klinker. A Multitouch Software Architecture. In Proc. of NordiCHI 2008, 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pages 463--466, Lund, Sweden, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. L. Forgy. RRete: A Fast Algorithm for the Many Pattern/Many Object Pattern Match Problem. Artificial Intelligence, 19(1):17--37, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Friedman-Hill. Jess in Action: Java Rule-Based Systems. Manning Publications, July 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Hoste. Experiments with the SunSPOT Accelerometer. Project report, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Kaltenbrunner, T. Bovermann, R. Bencina, and E. Costanza. TUIO: A Protocol for Table-Top Tangible User Interfaces. In Proc. of GW 2005, 6th Intl. Workshop on Gesture in Human-Computer Interaction and Simulation, Ile de Berder, France, May 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Kammer, M. Keck, G. Freitag, and M. Wacker. Taxonomy and Overview of Multi-touch Frameworks: Architecture, Scope and Features. In Proc. of Workshop on Engineering Patterns for Multi-Touch Interfaces, Berlin, Germany, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. I. Maier, T. Rompf, and M. Odersky. Deprecating the Observer Pattern. Technical Report EPFL-REPORT-148043, Ecole Polytechnique Fédeérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. H. Nakatani and J. A. Rohrlich. Soft Machines: A Philosophy of User-Computer Interface Design. In Proc. of CHI '83, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 19--23, Boston, USA, December 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. D. Nardi. Grafiti: Gesture Recognition mAnagement Framework for Interactive Tabletop Interfaces. Master's thesis, University of Pisa, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Ramanahally, S. Gilbert, T. Niedzielski, D. Velázquez, and C. Anagnost. Sparsh UI: A Multi-Touch Framework for Collaboration and Modular Gesture Recognition. In Proc. of WINVR 2009, Conference on Innovative Virtual Reality, pages 1--6, Chalon-sur-SaoÆne, France, February 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. Rubine. Specifying Gestures by Example. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH '91, 18th Intl. Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pages 329--337, Las Vegas, USA, August 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. B. Signer, U. Kurmann, and M. C. Norrie. iGesture: A General Gesture Recognition Framework. In Proc. of ICDAR 2007, 9th Intl. Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pages 954--958, Curitiba, Brazil, September 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Stewart, B. B. Bederson, and A. Druin. Single Display Groupware: A Model for Co-present Collaboration. In Proc. of CHI '99, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 286--293, Pittsburgh, USA, May 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Midas: a declarative multi-touch interaction framework

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        TEI '11: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction
        January 2011
        470 pages
        ISBN:9781450304788
        DOI:10.1145/1935701

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 January 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader