skip to main content
10.1145/1935701.1935751acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The augmentalist: enabling musicians to develop augmented musical instruments

Published:22 January 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the Augmentalist: a system that allows a musician to augment their existing musical instrument using a variety of sensors. This system is focused on the musician and their musical aims, rather than the sensor technology being used. The overall goal is to create allow musicians to easily explore new musical performance techniques with augmented musical instruments. We present the design process and implementation of the system, an example of an instrument developed by one of the 10 participating musicians and a discussion of a number of issues raised by the project, including musicians as designers, the potential for exploration and mastery and the transferability of instruments between performers.

References

  1. Reactable. http://www.reactable.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. N. Armstrong. An Enactive Approach to Digital Musical Instrument Design. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Nov. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Bouillot, Z. Settel, J. R. Cooperstock, and M. Wozniewski. A mobile wireless augmented guitar. In Proc. NIME 2007, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Greenberg and C. Fitchett. Phidgets: easy development of physical interfaces through physical widgets. In Proc. UIST 2001, pages 209--218. ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. O. Lahdeoja, M. M. Wanderley, and J. Malloch. Instrument augmentation using ancillary gestures for subtle sonic effects. In Proc. SMC 2009, pages 327--330, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. T. Marshall, M. Hartshorn, M. M. Wanderley, and D. J. Levitin. Sensor choice for parameter modulations in digital musical instruments: Empirical evidence from pitch modulation. Journal of New Music Research, 38(3):241--253, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. T. Marshall, J. Malloch, and M. M. Wanderley. Non-conscious control of sound spatialization. In Proc. ENACTIVE 2007, pages 377--380, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. E. R. Miranda and M. M. Wanderley. New Digital Musical Instruments: Control and Interaction beyond the Keyboard. A-R Editions, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Palacio-Quintin. The hyper-flute. In Proc. NIME 2003, pages 206--207, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Tanaka. Musical performance practice on sensor-based instruments. In M. M. Wanderley and M. Battier, editors, Trends in Gestural Control of Music, pages 389--405. IRCAM - Centre Pompidou, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Wessel and M. Wright. Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. Computer Music Journal, 26(3):11--22, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The augmentalist: enabling musicians to develop augmented musical instruments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        TEI '11: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction
        January 2011
        470 pages
        ISBN:9781450304788
        DOI:10.1145/1935701

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 January 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader