skip to main content
10.1145/1940761.1940800acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personal Health Records (PHR) and the future of the physician-patient relationship

Published:08 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We provide early evidence that healthcare consumers plan to play a more active role in their healthcare through the use of a patient-centric information tool---the Personal Health Record (PHR). We assess consumer attitudes, values, and beliefs of PHRs through the use of a focus group and further analyze the intention to adopt a PHR through the use of a survey based on the adoption of innovations model by Rogers [38]. We find that while barriers to PHR adoption exist---such as concerns about privacy, security and the lack of visible use of PHRs by others within immediate social groups---intention to use PHRs are high within our sample. This suggests that active consumer involvement in healthcare may be on the rise and, more importantly, that information may become a key mediator in the physician-patient relationship. While our findings are based on pilot studies consisting of relatively small sample sizes and subject to limited generalizability, these results do suggest that consumer empowerment has the potential to fundamentally alter traditional physician-patient paradigms.

References

  1. Abdolrasulnia, M., Menachemi, N., Shewchuk, R. M., Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J. and Brooks, R. G. Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians. Health Care Manage. Rev., 33, 3 (2008), 243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Agarwal, R. and Angst, C. M. Technology-Enabled Transformations in US Health Care: Early Findings on Personal Health Records and Individual Use. Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Audet, A. M., Davis, K. and Schoenbaum, S. C. Adoption of patient-centered care practices by physicians: results from a national survey. Arch. Intern. Med., 166, 7 (2006), 754.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ball, M. J. and Gold, J. Banking on health: Personal records and information exchange. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 20, 2 (2006), 71--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, M. J. and Lillis, J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int. J. Med. Inf., 61, 1 (2001), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bergeson, S. C. and Dean, J. D. A systems approach to patient-centered care. JAMA, 296, 23 (2006), 2848.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Berner, E. S., Detmer, D. E. and Simborg, D. Will the Wave Finally Break? A Brief View of the Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12, 1 (2005), 3--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Berwick, D. M. What 'Patient-Centered' Should Mean: Confessions Of An Extremist. Health Aff., 28, 4 (2009), w555--w565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Charles, C., Gafni, A. and Whelan, T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc. Sci. Med., 49, 5 (1999), 651--661.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chen, P. Healing the Doctor-Patient Divide. New York Times, Health (September 11, 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chrischilles, E. Personal Health Records for Medication Use: Views from Elders and Their Physicians. 2009, December 21, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Detmer, D. E. Building the national health information infrastructure for personal health, health care services, public health, and research. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 3 (Jan 6 2003), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Devers, K. J., Brewster, L. R. and Casalino, L. P. Changes in hospital competitive strategy: a new medical arms race? Health Serv. Res., 38, 1p2 (2003), 447--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Emanuel, E. J. and Emanuel, L. L. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Readings in health care ethics, (2000), 39--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ford, E. W., Menachemi, N., Peterson, L. T. and Huerta, T. R. Resistance Is Futile: But It Is Slowing the Pace of EHR Adoption Nonetheless. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16, 3 (2009), 274--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Frambach, R. T. and Schillewaert, N. Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 2 (2002), 163--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Furukawa, M. F., Raghu, T., Spaulding, T. J. and Vinze, A. Adoption Of Health Information Technology For Medication Safety In US Hospitals, 2006. Health Aff., 27, 3 (2008), 865--875.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gans, D. Impact of Electronic Health Records on the Financial Performance of Medical Group Practices. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2008 Annual Conference, 2009, December 21 (January 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaunt, N. Electronic health records for patient-centred healthcare. In Currie, W. and Finnegan, D. eds. Integrating Healthcare with Information and Communications Technology. Radcliffe Publishing, Oxon, UK, 2009, 113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Guadagnoli, E. and Ward, P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc. Sci. Med., 47, 3 (1998), 329--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Hackbarth, G. and Milgate, K. Using Quality Incentives To Drive Physician Adoption Of Health Information Technology. Health Aff., 24, 5 (2005), 1147--1149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Halamka, J. D., Mandl, K. D. and Tang, P. C. Early experiences with personal health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15, 1 (2008), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Hibbard, J. H. Engaging health care consumers to improve the quality of care. Med. Care, 41, 1 (2003), 61--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J., Bower, A., Girosi, F., Meili, R., Scoville, R. and Taylor, R. Can Electronic Medical Record Systems Transform Health Care? Potential Health Benefits, Savings, And Costs. Health Aff., 24, 5 (2005), 1103--1117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kaelber, D. C., Jha, A. K., Johnston, D., Middleton, B. and Bates, D. W. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15, 6 (2008), 729--736.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kahn, J. S., Aulakh, V. and Bosworth, A. What It Takes: Characteristics Of The Ideal Personal Health Record. Health Aff., 28, 2 (2009), 369--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kazley, A. S. and Ozcan, Y. A. Organizational and Environmental Determinants of Hospital EMR Adoption: A National Study. J. Med. Syst., 31, 5 (2007), 375--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kim, M. I. and Johnson, K. B. Personal health records evaluation of functionality and utility. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 9, 2 (2002), 171--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Krohn, R. The Consumer-Centric Personal Health Record---It's Time. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 21, 1 (2007), 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Levinson, W., Kao, A., Kuby, A. and Thisted, R. A. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 6 (2005), 531--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Neupert, P. and Mundie, C. Personal Health Management Systems: Applying The Full Power Of Software To Improve The Quality And Efficiency Of Care. Health Aff., 28, 2 (2009), 390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Ozdemir, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Barron, J. and Hall, U. A Two-Sided Market Analysis of Digital Health Records Under Switching Costs. SSRN, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Perlin, J. B., Kolodner, R. M. and Roswell, R. H. The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care. Am. J. Manag. Care, 10, 11 Pt 2 (2004), 828--836.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Peters, K., Niebling, M., Slimmer, C., Green, T. and Webb, J. Usability Guidance for Improving the User Interface and Adoption of Online Personal Health Records. Ver 1.1., 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Raisinghani, M. S. and Young, E. Personal health records: key adoption issues and implications for management. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 4, 1 (2008), 67--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Reti, S. R., Feldman, H. J. and Safran, C. Governance for Personal Health Records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16, 1 (January 1, 2009), 14--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Feature: The Power and Potential of Personal Health Records, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Saaksjarvi, M. Consumer adoption of technological innovations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6, 2 (2003), 90--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Steinbrook, R. Personally Controlled Online Health Data--The Next Big Thing in Medical Care? N. Engl. J. Med., 358, 16 (2008), 1653--1657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., Donner, A., McWhinney, I. R., Oates, J., Weston, W. W. and Jordan, J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J. Fam. Pract., 49, 9 (2000), 796--804.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Tang, P. C., Ash, J. S., Bates, D. W., Overhage, J. M. and Sands, D. Z. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 2 (2006), 121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Thompson, T. G. and Brailer, D. J. The Decade of Health Information Technology: Delivering Consumer-centric and Information-rich Health Care. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Undem, T. Consumers and Health Information Technology: A National Survey. California HealthCare Foundation, (2010), 1--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Vick, S. and Scott, A. Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. J. Health Econ., 17, 5 (1998), 587--605.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Walker, J. M. Electronic Medical Records And Health Care Transformation. Health Aff., 24, 5 (2005), 1118--1120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Yoh, E., Damhorst, M. L., Sapp, S. and Laczniak, R. Consumer adoption of the Internet: The case of apparel shopping. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 12 (2003), 1095--1118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Zolait, A. H. and Sulaiman, A. Incorporating the Innovation Attributes Introduced by Rogers' Theory into Theory of Reasoned Action: An Examination of Internet Banking Adoption in Yemen. Computer and Information Science, 1, 1 (2009), P. 36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Personal Health Records (PHR) and the future of the physician-patient relationship

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            iConference '11: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference
            February 2011
            858 pages
            ISBN:9781450301213
            DOI:10.1145/1940761

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 February 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader