Abstract
Current approaches to accessible computing share a common goal of making technology accessible to users with disabilities. Perhaps because of this goal, they may also share a tendency to centralize disability rather than ability. We present a refinement to these approaches called ability-based design that consists of focusing on ability throughout the design process in an effort to create systems that leverage the full range of human potential. Just as user-centered design shifted the focus of interactive system design from systems to users, ability-based design attempts to shift the focus of accessible design from disability to ability. Although prior approaches to accessible computing may consider users’ abilities to some extent, ability-based design makes ability its central focus. We offer seven ability-based design principles and describe the projects that inspired their formulation. We also present a research agenda for ability-based design.
- Appert, C., Chapuis, O., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. 2008. Evaluation of pointing performance on screen edges. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’08). ACM Press, 119--126. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bates, R. and Istance, H. O. 2003. Why are eye mice unpopular? A detailed comparison of head and eye controlled assistive technology pointing devices. Univ. Access Inform. Soc. 2, 3, 280--290.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bigham, J. P. and Prince, C. M. 2007. WebAnywhere: A screen reader on-the-go. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 225--226. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bigham, J. P., Prince, C. M., and Ladner, R. E. 2008. WebAnywhere: A screen reader on-the-go. In Proceedings of the ACM International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A’08). ACM Press, 73--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bigham, J. P., Chisholm, W., and Ladner, R. E. 2010. WebAnywhere: Experiences with a new delivery model for access technology. In Proceedings of the ACM International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A’10). ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Biswas, P. and Robinson, P. 2008. Automatic evaluation of assistive interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’08). ACM Press, 247--256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bonner, M. N., Brudvik, J. T., Abowd, G. D., and Edwards, W. K. 2010. No-Look notes: Accessible eyesfree multi-touch text entry. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive’10). Springer-Verlag, 409--426. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carter, S., Hurst, A., Mankoff, J., and Li, J. 2006. Dynamically adapting GUIs to diverse input devices. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, 63--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casali, S. P. 1992. Cursor control device performance by persons with physical disabilities: Implications for hardware and software design. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society. Human Factors Society, 311--315.Google Scholar
- Casali, S. P. 1995. A physical skills based strategy for choosing an appropriate interface method. In ExtraOrdinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities, A. D. N. Edwards Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 315--341. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chapuis, O., Blanch, R., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. 2007. Fitts’ law in the wild: A field study of aimed movements. LRJ Tech. rep.1480. Université de Paris Sud, Orsay, France.Google Scholar
- Chickowski, E. 2004. It’s all about access. Alaska Airlines Mag. 28, 12, 26--31, 80--82.Google Scholar
- Choudhury, T., Borriello, G., Consolvo, S., Haehnel, D., Harrison, B., Hemingway, B., Hightower, J., Klasnja, P., Koscher, K., LaMarca, A., Landay, J. A., Legrand, L., Lester, J., Rahimi, A., Rea, A., and Wyatt, D. 2008. The mobile sensing platform: An embedded activity recognition system. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 7, 2, 32--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cook, A. M. and Hussey, S. M. 2002. Assistive Technologies. Principles and Practice. 2nd Ed. Mosby, St. Louis.Google Scholar
- Dawe, M. 2004. Complexity, cost and customization: Uncovering barriers to adoption of assistive technology. Refereed Poster at the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’04).Google Scholar
- Dixon, M. and Fogarty, J. A. 2010. Prefab: Implementing advanced behaviors using pixel-based reverse engineering of interface structure. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM Press, 1525--1534. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edwards, A. D. N. 1995. Computers and people with disabilities. In Extraordinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities, A. D. N. Edwards Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 19--43. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evenson, S., Rheinfrank, J., and Dubberly, H. 2010. Ability-centered design: From static to adaptive worlds. Interactions 17, 6, 75--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Farris, J. S., Jones, K. S., and Anders, B. A. 2001. Acquisition speed with targets on the edge of the screen: An application of Fitts’ Law to commonly used web browser controls. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (HFES’01). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1205--1209.Google Scholar
- Farris, J. S., Jones, K. S., and Anders, B. A. 2002a. Using impenetrable borders in a graphical web browser: How does distance influence target selection speed? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (HFES’02). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1300--1304.Google Scholar
- Farris, J. S., Jones, K. S., and Anders, B. A. 2002b. Using impenetrable borders in a graphical web browser: Are all angles equal? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (HFES’02). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1251--1255.Google Scholar
- Fichten, C. S., Barile, M., Asuncion, J. V,. and Fossey, M. E. 2000. What government, agencies, and organizations can do to improve access to computers for postsecondary students with disabilities: Recommendations based on Canadian empirical data. Int. J. Rehab. Resear. 23, 3, 191--199.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Findlater, L. and McGrenere, J. 2004. A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’04). ACM Press, 89--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Findlater, L., Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., and Dawson, J. 2009. Ephemeral adaptation: The use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM Press, 1655--1664. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fitts, P. M. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psych. 47, 6, 381--391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. and Borning, A. 2006. Value sensitive design and information systems. In Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, D. Galletta and P. Zhang Eds., M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 348--372.Google Scholar
- Froehlich, J., Wobbrock, J. O., and Kane, S. K. 2007. Barrier pointing: Using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 19--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gajos, K. and Weld, D. S. 2004. SUPPLE: Automatically generating user interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’04). ACM Press, 93--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gajos, K. and Weld, D. S. 2005. Preference elicitation for interface optimization. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’05). ACM Press, 173--182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gajos, K. and Weld, D. S. 2006. Automatically generating custom user interfaces for users with physical disabilities In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, 243--244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gajos, K. Z., Wobbrock, J. O., and Weld, D. S. 2007. Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users’ motor and vision capabilities. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’07). ACM Press, 231--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gajos, K. Z., Wobbrock, J. O., and Weld, D. S. 2008. Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM Press, 1257--1266. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gajos, K. Z., Weld, D. S., and Wobbrock, J. O. 2010. Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with SUPPLE. Artif. Intel. 174, 12--13, 910--950. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goette, T. 1998. Factors leading to the successful use of voice recognition technology. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS’98). ACM Press, 189--196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gould, J. D. and Lewis, C. 1985. Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Comm. ACM 28, 3, 300--311. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gross, D. P. 2004. Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity. J. Occup. Rehab. 14, 3, 165--174.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harada, S., Landay, J. A., Malkin, J., Li, X., and Bilmes, J. A. 2006. The vocal joystick: Evaluation of voice-based cursor control techniques. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, 197--204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harada, S., Wobbrock, J. O., and Landay, J. A. 2007. VoiceDraw: A hands-free voice-driven drawing application for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 27--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harper, S. 2007. Is there design for all? Univ. Access Inform. Soc. 6, 1, 111--113. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harris, C. M. and Wolpert, D. M. 1998. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394, 780--784.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hazard, B. L. 2008. Separate but equal? A comparison of content on library web pages and their text versions. J. Web Librarian. 2, 2--3, 417--428.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hinckley, K., Pierce, J., Sinclair, M., and Horvitz, E. 2000. Sensing techniques for mobile interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’00). ACM Press, New York, 91--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., and Mankoff, J. 2007. Dynamic detection of novice vs. skilled use without a task model. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). ACM Press, 271--280. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., Mankoff, J., and Trewin, S. 2008a. Automatically detecting pointing performance. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’08). ACM Press, 11--19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hurst, A., Mankoff, J., and Hudson, S. E. 2008b. Understanding pointing problems in real world computing environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’08). ACM Press, 43--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., and Mankoff, J. 2010. Automatically identifying targets users interact with during real world tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’10). ACM Press, 11--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hwang, F., Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J., and Robinson, P. 2001. Perception and haptics: Towards more accessible computers for motion-impaired users. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Perceptive User Interfaces (PUI’01). ACM Press, New York, 1--9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hwang, F., Keates, S., Langdon, P., and Clarkson, P. J. 2004. Mouse movements of motion-impaired users: A submovement analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’04). ACM Press, New York, 102--109. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jipp, M., Badreddin, E., Abkai, C., and Hesser, J. 2008a. Individual ability-based system configuration: Cognitive profiling with Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC’08). IEEE Press, 3359--3364.Google Scholar
- Jipp, M., Wagner, A., and Badreddin, E. 2008b. Individual ability-based system design of dependable human-technology interaction. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress (IFAC’08). Elsevier Ltd., 14779--14784.Google Scholar
- Jipp, M., Bartolein, C., and Badreddin, E. 2009a. Predictive validity of wheelchair driving behavior for fine motor abilities: Definition of input variables for an adaptive wheelchair system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC’09). IEEE Press, 39--44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jipp, M., Bartolein, C., Badreddin, E., Abkai, C., and Hesser, J. 2009b. Psychomotor profiling with Bayesian neworks: Prediction of user abilities based on inputs of motorized wheelchair parameters. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC’09). IEEE Press, 1680--1685. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson, B. R., Farris, J. S., and Jones, K. S. 2003. Selection of web browser controls with and without impenetrable borders: Does width make a difference? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (HFES’03). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1380--1384.Google Scholar
- Kane, S. K., Bigham, J. P., and Wobbrock, J. O. 2008a. Slide Rule: Making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’08). ACM Press, 73--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., Harniss, M., and Johnson, K. L. 2008b. TrueKeys: Identifying and correcting typing errors for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’08). ACM Press, 349--352. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., and Smith, I. E. 2008c. Getting off the treadmill: Evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’08). ACM Press, 109--118. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keates, S., Clarkson, P. J., Harrison, L.-A., and Robinson, P. 2000. Towards a practical inclusive design approach. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’00). ACM Press, New York, 45--52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J., and Robinson, P. 2002. User models and user physical capability. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 12, 2--3, 139--169. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keates, S. and Clarkson, P. J. 2003. Countering design exclusion through inclusive design. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’03). ACM Press, 69--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keates, S. and Clarkson, P. J. 2004. Countering Design Exclusion: An Introduction to Inclusive Design. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
- Keates, S., Trewin, S., and Paradise, J. 2005. Using pointing devices: Quantifying differences across user groups. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’05). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Kelley, D. and Hartfield, B. 1996. The designer’s stance. In Bringing Design to Software, T. Winograd Ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 151--170. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koester, H. H. 2003. Abandonment of speech recognition by new users. In Proceedings of the RESNA 26th Annual Conference (RESNA’03). RESNA Press, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
- Koester, H. H., Lopresti, E. F., Ashlock, G., McMillan, W. W., Moore, P., and Simpson, R. C. 2003. Compass: Software for computer skills assessment. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities (CSUN’03).Google Scholar
- Koester, H. H., Lopresti, E. F., and Simpson, R. C. 2005. Toward Goldilocks’ pointing device: Determining a “just right” gain sening for users with physical impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’05). ACM Press, 84--89. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koester, H. H., Lopresti, E. F., and Simpson, R. C. 2006. Measurement validity for Compass assessment software. In Proceedings of the RESNA 29th Annual Conference (RESNA’06). RESNA Press.Google Scholar
- Koester, H. H., Lopresti, E. F., and Simpson, R. C. 2007a. Toward automatic adjustment of keyboard settings for people with physical impairments. Disab. Rehab. Assist. Techn. 2, 5, 261--274.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Koester, H. H., Simpson, R. C., Spaeth, D. M., and Lopresti, E. F. 2007b. Reliability and validity of Compass software for access assessment. In Proceedings of the RESNA 30th Annual Conference (RESNA’07). RESNA Press.Google Scholar
- Kondraske, G. V. 1988a. Workplace design: An elemental resource approach to task analysis and human performance measurements. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology (ICAART’88). RESNA Press, 608--611.Google Scholar
- Kondraske, G. V. 1988b. Rehabilitation engineering: Towards a systematic process. IEEE Engin. Medic. Bio. Mag. 7, 3, 11--15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kondraske, G. V. 1990a. A PC-based performance measurement laboratory system. J. Clinic. Engin. 15, 6, 467--478.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kondraske, G. V. 1990b. Quantitative measurement and assessment of performance. In Rehabilitation Engineering, J. H. Leslie and R. V. Smith Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 101--125.Google Scholar
- Kondraske, G. V. 1995. A working model for human system-task interfaces. In The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, J. D. Bronzino Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2157--2174.Google Scholar
- Law, C. M., Sears, A., and Price, K. J. 2005. Issues in the categorization of disabilities for user testing. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’05). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
- Lazar, J. 2007. Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK, 610. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Levenshtein, V. I. 1965. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 163, 4, 845--848.Google Scholar
- Lin, M., Goldman, R., Price, K. J., Sears, A., and Jacko, J. 2007. “How do people tap when walking” An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65, 9, 759--769. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mace, R. L., Hardie, G. J., and Place, J. P. 1991. Accessible environments: Toward universal design. In Design Intervention: Toward a More Humane Architecture, W. E. Preiser, J. C. Vischer, and E. T. White Eds., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
- MacKenzie, I. S. and Isokoski, P. 2008. Fitts’ throughput and the speed-accuracy trade-off. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM Press, 1633--1636. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matheson, L. N. 2004. History, design characteristics, and uses of the pictorial activity and task sorts. J. Occup. Rehab. 14, 3, 175--195.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moffatt, K. and McGrenere, J. 2010. Steadied-bubbles: Combining techniques to address pen-based pointing errors for younger and older adults. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM Press, 1125--1134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mustonen, T., Olkkonen, M., and Hakkinen, J. 2004. Examining mobile phone text legibility while walking. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’04). ACM Press, New York, 1243--1246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Newell, A. F. 1995. Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction. In Extraordinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities, A. D. N. Edwards Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Newell, A. F. and Gregor, P. 2000. User sensitive inclusive design-in search of a new paradigm. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’00). ACM Press, 39--44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Persad, U., Langdon, P., and Clarkson, J. 2007. Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation. Univ. Access Inform. Soc. 6, 2, 119--135. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Potter, R. L., Weldon, L. J., and Shneiderman, B. 1988. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: An experimental evaluation of three strategies. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’88). ACM Press, 27--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pransky, G. S. and Dempsey, P. G. 2004. Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations. J. Occup. Rehab. 14, 3, 217--229.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Price, K. J. and Sears, A. 2008. Performance-based functional assessment: An algorithm for measuring physical capabilities. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ringbauer, B., Peissner, M., and Gemou, M. 2007. From “design for all” towards “design for one”---A modular user interface approach. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI’07). Springer-Verlag, 517--526. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schwesig, C., Poupyrev, I., and Morl, E. 2004. Gummi: A bendable computer. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’04). ACM Press, New York, 263--270. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sears, A. and Shneiderman, B. 1991. High precision touchscreens: Design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 34, 4, 593--613. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sears, A., Lin, M., Jacko, J., and Xiao, Y. 2003. When computers fade. Pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’03). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1298--1302.Google Scholar
- Sears, A., Young, M., and Feng, J. 2008. Physical disabilities and computing technologies: An analysis of impairments. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, J. A. Jacko and A. Sears Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, 829--852.Google Scholar
- Shinohara, K. and Tenenberg, J. 2007. Observing Sara: A case study of a blind person’s interactions with technology. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 171--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shinohara, K. and Wobbrock, J. O. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: Assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM Press, To appear. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shneiderman, B. 2000. Universal usability. Comm. ACM 43, 5, 84--91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, R. V. and Leslie, J. H. 1990. Rehabilitation Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
- Smith, S. S. and Kondraske, G. V. 1987. Computerized system for quantitative measurement of sensorimotor aspects of human performance. Phys. Ther. 67, 12, 1860--1866.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stary, C. 1997. The role of design and evaluation principles for user interfaces for all. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’97). Elsevier Science, New York, 477--480. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steinfeld, E. 1994. The concept of universal design. In Proceedings of the 6th Ibero-American Conference on Accessibility.Google Scholar
- Stephanidis, C. 2001a. User interfaces for all: Concepts, methods, and tools. Human Factors and Ergonomics Series, G. Salvendy Ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 728. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephanidis, C. 2001b. Adaptive techniques for universal access. User model. User-Adapt. Interact. 11, 1--2, 159--179. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephanidis, C., Akoumianakis, D., and Savidis, A. 1995. Design representations and development support for user interface adaptation. In Proceedings of the 1st ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All (UI4All’95). ICS-FORTH.Google Scholar
- Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Smith, M. J., and Koubek, R. J. 1997. Towards the next generation of UIST: Developing for all users. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’97). Elsevier Science, New York, 473--476. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Akoumianakis, D., Bevan, N., Brewer, J., Emiliani, P. L., Galetsas, A., Haataja, S., Iakovidis, I., Jacko, J. A., Jenkins, P., Karshmer, A. I., Korn, P., Marcus, A., Murphy, H. J., Stary, C., Vanderheiden, G., Weber, G., and Ziegler, J. 1998. Toward an information society for all: An international R&D agenda. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 10, 2, 107--134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Story, M. F. 1998. Maximizing usability: The principles of universal design. Assist. Techn. 10, 1, 412.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Terry, M. and Mynatt, E. D. 2002. Side views: Persistent, on-demand previews for open-ended tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’02). ACM Press, 71--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trewin, S. 2002. An invisible keyguard. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS’02). ACM Press, 143--149. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trewin, S. and Pain, H. 1997. Dynamic modelling of keyboard skills: Supporting users with motor disabilities. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on User Modeling (UM’97). Springer, 135--146.Google Scholar
- Trewin, S. and Pain, H. 1999. Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 50, 2,109--144. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trewin, S., Keates, S., and Moffatt, K. 2006. Developing steady clicks: A method of cursor assistance for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, 26--33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vanderheiden, G. 1998. Universal design and assistive technology in communication and information technologies: Alternatives or complements? Assist. Techn. 10, 1, 29--36.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vanderheiden, G. 2000. Fundamental principles and priority~ setting for universal usability. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’00). ACM Press, 32--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. 2007. Shift: A technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). ACM Press, 657--666. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walker, N. and Smelcer, J. B. 1990. A comparison of selection time from walking and bar menus. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’90). ACM Press, New York, 221--225. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walker, N., Philbin, D. A., and Fisk, A. D. 1997. Age-related differences in movement control: Adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. J. Geront. Psych. Sci. 52B, 1, 40--52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, J. and Mankoff, J. 2003. Theoretical and architectural support for input device adaptation. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’03). ACM Press, New York, 85--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O. 2003. The benefits of physical edges in gesture-making: Empirical support for an edge-based unistroke alphabet. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’03). ACM Press, New York, 942--943. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O. 2006. The future of mobile device research in HCI. In CHI Workshop Proceedings: What is the Next Generation of Human-Computer Interaction? 131--134.Google Scholar
- Wobbrock, J. O. and Gajos, K. Z. 2007. A comparison of area pointing and goal crossing for people with and without motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 3--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. 2006a. From letters to words: Efficient stroke-based word completion for trackball text entry. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, New York, 2--9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. 2006b. Trackball text entry for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’06). ACM Press, New York, 479--488. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. 2006c. Analyzing the input stream for character-level errors in unconstrained text entry evaluations. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 13, 4, 458--489. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. 2007. Enabling devices, empowering people: The design and evaluation of Trackball EdgeWrite. Disab. Rehab. Assist. Techn. 2, 4, 1--22.Google Scholar
- Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Hudson, S. E. 2003a. Exploring edge-based input techniques for handheld text entry. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW’03). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 280--282. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Kembel, J. A. 2003b. EdgeWrite: A stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’03). ACM Press, New York, 61--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O., Aung, H. H., Rothrock, B., and Myers, B. A. 2005. Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05). ACM Press, New York, 1869--1872. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O., Fogarty, J., Liu, S.-Y., Kimuro, S., and Harada, S. 2009. The Angle Mouse: Target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM Press, 1401--1410. Google ScholarDigital Library
- World Health Organization. 2009. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Yamabe, T. and Takahashi, K. 2007. Experiments in mobile user interface adaptation for walking users. In Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Pervasive Computing (IPC’07). IEEE Computer Society, 280--284. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yesilada, Y., Harper, S., Chen, T., and Trewin, S. 2010. Small-device users situationally impaired by input. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 3, 427--435. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples
Recommendations
The role of accessibility in a universal web
W4A '14: Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference"Universal design" is the process of creating products that are usable by people with the widest possible range of abilities, operating within the widest possible range of situations; whereas "accessibility" primarily refers to design for people with ...
Beyond standards: reaching usability goals through user participation
The promise of social inclusion, reinforced by online technologies, has not become the reality for most people with disabilities. In 2002, over ten years after the implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, more people with disabilities are ...
Mobile search made easier: An ability-based mobile search prototype for people with dyslexia
CHIIR '24: Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and RetrievalAlthough 1 person in 14 has dyslexia, most search interfaces are designed based on a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach, creating inequity for neurodiverse searchers. This is also the case for mobile search, which accounts for most Google searches. While ...
Comments