skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957724acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Hitting a robot vs. hitting a human: is it the same?

Published:06 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The present project aimed to study how people make moral judgment for human versus robot behaviors. Ten transgression scenarios were presented to the participants with either a human or a robot as the perpetrator or the victim. Results showed that most of the transgressions were perceived as less immoral when it was acted on a robot than on a human. Moral judgments for human behaviors were more intuitive and emotion based. Moral judgments for robot behaviors involve both intuition and cognitive reasoning. Possible psychological causes were discussed.

References

  1. E. Turiel, M. Killen, C. C. Helwig. The development of social knowledge: Moraltiy and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. "The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture specific virtues, and perhaps even modeules." In P. Carruthers, S. Laurenc, and S. Stich (Eds.) The Innate Mind, Vol. 3. New York: Oxford, pp. 367--391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Haidt, J. "The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment." Psychological review, vol 108, pp. 814--834.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Hitting a robot vs. hitting a human: is it the same?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
      March 2011
      526 pages
      ISBN:9781450305617
      DOI:10.1145/1957656

      Copyright © 2011 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader