skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957746acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Tangible interfaces for robot teleoperation

Published:06 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present some results obtained through an experimental evaluation of tangible user interfaces (TUIs), comparing their novel interaction paradigms with more conventional interfaces, such as a joypad and a keyboard. Our main goal is to make a formal assessment of TUIs in robotics through a rigorous and extensive experimental evaluation. Firstly, we identified the main benefits of TUIs for robot teleoperation in a urban search and rescue task. Secondly, we provide an evaluation framework to allow for an effective comparison of tangible interfaces with other input devices.

References

  1. P. Marshall, Y. Rogers, and E. Hornecker. Are tangible interfaces really any better than other kinds of interfaces. Pervasive Interaction Labthe, Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Valero, G. Randelli, C. Saracini, F. Botta, and D. Nardi. Give me the control, i can see the robot! In Proc. of IEEE Int. Workshop on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR 2009), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Tangible interfaces for robot teleoperation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
      March 2011
      526 pages
      ISBN:9781450305617
      DOI:10.1145/1957656

      Copyright © 2011 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader