- 1 Alspaugh, C.A. Identification of some components of computer programming aptitude. J. Res. Math. Educ. 3, 2 (Mar. 1972), 89-98.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 2 Bateman, C.R. Predicting performance in a basic computer course. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Decision Sciences. AIDS Press, Atlanta, Go., 1973.Google Scholar
- 3 Capstick, C.K. Gordon, J.D., and Salvadori, A. Predicting performance by university students in introductory computing courses. SIGCSE Bull. 7, 3 (Sept. 1975), 21-29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Dixon, W.J., and Brown, M.B., Eds. BMDP Biomedical Computer Programs: P-Series 1979. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 1979.Google Scholar
- 5 Findlay, W., and Watt, D.A. PASCAL: An Introduction to Methodical Programming. Computer Science Press, Rockville, Md., 1978. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 Fowler, G.C., and Glorfeld, L.W. Predicting aptitude in introductory computing: A classification model. AEDS J. 14, 2 (Winter 1981), 96- 109.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7 Fox, L.H. The effects of sex-role socialization on mathematics participation and achievement. In Women and Mathematics: Research Perspectivesfor Change, L.H. Fox, E. Fennema, and J. Sherman, Eds. National Institute of Education, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 1-77.Google Scholar
- 8 Gray, H.L., and Shucany, W.R. The Generalized Jackknife Statistic. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
- 9 Hostetler, T.R. Predicting student success in an introductory programming course. Proceedings of NECC5. IEEE Press, Silver Spring, Md. 1983.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 IBM. Manual for administrating and scoring the aptitude test for programmer personnel. IBM Technical Publications Dept., White Plains, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
- 11 Lachenbruch, P.A. Diseriminant Analysis. Hafner Press, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
- 12 Mazlack, L.J. Identifying potential to acquire programming skill. Commun. ACM 23, 1 (Jan. 1980), 14-17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13 McCabe, G. Computations for variable selection in discriminant analysis. Technometrics 17, 1 (Feb. 1975), 103-109.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14 Palormo, J.M. Computer Programmer Aptitude Battery: Examiner's Manual. Science Research Associates, Chicago, Ill., 1974.Google Scholar
- 15 Petersen, C.C., and Howe. T.G. Predicting academic success in introduction to computers. AEDS J. 12, 4 {Summer 1979), 182-191.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 16 Wirth, N. Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1976. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17 Wolleat, P.L. Pedro. J.D., Becker, A.D., and Fennema, E. Sex differences in high school students' causal attribution of performance in mathematics. J. Res. Math. Educ. 11, 5 (Nov. 1980), 356-366.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
Predicting the success of freshmen in a computer science major
Recommendations
Computer Science Education in North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany—A Case Study
Special Issue II on Computer Science Education in K-12 SchoolsIn North-Rhine Westphalia, the most populated state in Germany, Computer Science (CS) has been taught in secondary schools since the early 1970s. This article provides an overview of the past and current situation of CS education in North-Rhine ...
High School Calculus and Computer Science Course Taking as Predictors of Success in Introductory College Computer Science
Success in an introductory college computer science (CS) course encourages students to major and pursue careers in computer science and many other STEM fields, whereas weak performance is often a powerful deterrent. This article examines the role of ...
Sharing computer science education ideas: Israeli-Russian collaboration
This article describes a unique Israeli-Russian project, in which Israeli high school computer science (CS) teachers promote curricular reform in the Russian region of Penza, based on the Israeli high school CS curriculum. The reform involves local ...
Comments