Life "modes" in social media

ABSTRACT

Current social media products such as Facebook and Twitter have not sufficiently addressed how to help users organize people and content streams across different areas of their lives. We conducted a qualitative design research study to explore how we might best leverage natural models of social organization to improve experiences of social media. We found that participants organize their social worlds based on life 'modes', i.e., family, work and social. They strategically use communication technologies to manage intimacy levels within these modes, and levels of permeability through the boundaries between these modes. Mobile communication in particular enabled participants to aggregate and share content dynamically across life modes. While exploring problems with managing their social media streams, people showed a strong need for focused sharing - the ability to share content only with appropriate audiences within certain areas of life.

References

1. Ashforth, B., Kreiner, G. & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro-transitions. Academy of Management Review 25, 3, 472--491.
2. Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States, First Monday (2006),11, 9.
3. Boyd, D. (2004). Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press.
4. Brown, J. (1998). The Self. McGraw-Hill, Boston.
5. Carroll, J. (2000). Making use: Scenario-based design of Human- Computer Interaction. MIT Press.
6. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53, 747.
7. Davidoff, S., Lee, M. K., Dey, A. K., & Zimmerman, J. (2007). Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. UbiComp.Springer-Verlag 429--446.
8. DiMicco et al. (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. In Proc. of CSCW 2008.
9. DiMicco, J., & Millen, D. (2007). Identity Management: Multiple Presentations of Self in Facebook. GROUP'07.
10. Eldon, E. (2009). Facebook reaches 100 million monthly active users in the U.S. Insidefacebook.com.
11. Farnham, S., & Churchill, E. F. (2011). Faceted identity, faceted lives: Social and technical issues with being yourself online. In Proc. CSCW 2011.
12. Farnham et al. (2003). Personal Map: Automatically Modeling the User's Online Social Network. Interact' 03 M. Rauterberg et al. (Eds.) IOS Press 567--574.
13. Google Latitude, www.google.com/latitude/intro.htm.
14. Gross, B. & Churchill, E. F. (2007). Addressing constraints: Multiple usernames, task spillage, and notions of identity. In Proc. CHI 2007, Work-in-progress. ACM Press.
15. Heer, J. & Boyd, D. (2005). Vizster: Visualizing Online Social Networks, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, InfoVis.
16. Heiss, J. (1992). Social roles. In Rosenberg, Morris, & Turner, Ralph (eds.). Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives. Transaction Publishers.
17. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1992). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102--138). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Johnson, B. & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Tree-Maps: a space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. In Readings in information Visualization: Using Vision To Think, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 152--159.
19. Ling, R. & Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In Katz, J. and Aakhus, M. (eds.) Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge U. Press.
20. Novak, J. D. & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTool.
21. Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1995). Home and Work. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Plurk, http://www.plurk.com/aboutUs.
23. Rememble, http://www.rememble.com.
24. Schrammel, J., Koffel, C. & Tscheligi, M. (2009). How much do you tell? Information disclosure behavior in different types of online communities. Communities and Technologies.
25. Skeels, M. M. & Grudin, J. (2009). When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. GROUP'09.
26. Strater, K., & Lipfort, H. (2008). Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community. British Computer Society.
27. Touchgraph, www.touchgraph.com/visplatform.html.
28. Turner, T., Smith, M., Fisher, D. (2005). Picturing Usenet: Mapping computer-mediated collective action. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Comm., 10(4), 7.
29. Wagner et al. (2010). Hide and seek: location sharing practices with social media. MobileHCI '10. ACM Press, 55--58.
30. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. CHI 2007. ACM Press 493--502.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)