ABSTRACT
Despite the tremendous popularity of social network sites both on the web and within enterprises, the relationship information they contain may be often incomplete or outdated. We suggest a novel crowdsourcing approach that uses a game to help enrich and expand the social network topology. The game prompts players to provide the names of people who have a relationship with individuals they know. The game was deployed for a one-month period within a large global organization. We provide an analysis of the data collected through this deployment, in comparison with the data from the organization's social network site. Our results indicate that the game rapidly collects large volumes of valid information that can be used to enrich and reinforce an existing social network site's data. We point out other aspects and benefits of using a crowdsourcing game to harvest social network information.
- Ambati, V., Vogel, S., & Carbonell J. 2010. Active learning and crowd-sourcing for machine translation. Proc. LREC'10.Google Scholar
- Arase, Y., Xie, X., Duan, M., Hara, T., & Nishio, S. 2009. A game based approach to assign geographical relevance to web images. Proc. WWW '09, 811--820. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Archak, N. 2010. Money, glory and cheap talk: analyzing strategic behavior of contestants in simultaneous crowdsourcing contests on TopCoder.com. Proc. WWW '10, 21--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernstein, M., Tan, D., Smith, G., Czerwinski, M., & Horvitz, E. 2010. Personalization via friendsourcing. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17, 2 (May. 2010), 1--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bonhard, P. & Sasse, M. A. 2006. 'Knowing me, knowing you' - Using profiles and social networking to improve recommender systems. BT Technology Journal 24, 3 (Jul. 2006), 84--98. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boyd, D. & Heer, J. 2006. Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster. Proc. HICSS '06. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brabham, D. C. 2008. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence 14, 1, 75--90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349--399.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carmel, D., Zwerdling, N., Guy I., Ofek-Koifman, S., Har'el N., Ronen, I., Uziel, E., Yogev, S., & Chernov, S. 2009. Personalized Social Search based on the User's Social Network. Proc. CIKM '09, 1227--1236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dugan, C., Muller, M., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Brownholtz, B., & Moore, M. 2007. The dogear game: a social bookmark recommender system. Proc. GROUP '07, 387--390. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ehrlich, K., Lin, C. & Griffiths-Fisher, V. 2007. Searching for experts in the enterprise: combining text and social network analysis. Proc. Group'07, 117--126. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Farrell, S., Lau, T., Nusser, S., Wilcox, E., & Muller, M. 2007. Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging. Proc. UIST '07, 91--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Farrell, S., Lau, T., & Nusser, S. 2007. Building communities with people-tags. Proc. INTERACT '07, 357--360. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Farzan, R., DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Dugan, C., Geyer, W., & Brownholtz, E. 2008. Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise. Proc. CHI '08, 563--572. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ganjisaffar, Y., Javanmardi, S., & Lopes, C. 2009. Leveraging crowdsourcing heuristics to improve search in Wikipedia. Proc. WikiSym '09. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilbert, E. & Karahalios, K. 2009. Predicting tie strength with social media. Proc. CHI '09, 211--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Granovetter, M. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Guy, I., Jacovi, M., Shahar, E., Meshulam, N., Soroka, V., & Farrell, S. 2008. Harvesting with SONAR: the value of aggregating social network information. Proc. CHI '08, 1017--1026. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy, I., Jacovi, M., Meshulam, N., Ronen, I., & Shahar, E. 2008. Public vs. private: comparing public social network information with email. Proc. CSCW'08, 393--402. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy, I., Jacovi, M., Perer, A., Ronen, I., and Uziel, E.: Same Places, Same Things, Same People? Mining User Similarity on Social Media. Proc. CSCW'10, 41--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy I., Ronen I., & Wilcox E. 2009. Do You Know? Recommending People to Invite into Your Social Network. Proc. IUI'09, 77--86. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy, I., Zwerdling, N., Carmel, D., Ronen, I., Uziel, E., Yogev, S., & Ofek-Koifman S. 2009. Personalized Recommendation of Social Software Items based on Social Relations. Proc. RecSys '09, 53--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Howe, J. 2006. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14, 6 (June 2006).Google Scholar
- Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., and Wu, F. 2009. Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. J. Inf. Sci. 35, 6 (Dec. 2009), 758--765. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., & Tardos, É. 2003. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. KDD '03, 137--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kautz, H., Selman, B., & Shah, M. 1997. Referral Web: combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Commun. ACM 40, 3 (Mar. 1997), 63--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Law, E. & von Ahn, L. 2009. Input-agreement: a new mechanism for collecting data using human computation games. Proc. CHI '09, 1197--1206. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ma, H., Chandrasekar, R., Quirk, C., & Gupta, A. 2009. Page hunt: improving search engines using human computation games. Proc. SIGIR '09, 746--747. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., & Panovich, K. 2010. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior. Proc. CHI '10, 1739--1748. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Surowiecki, J. 2004. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Von Ahn, L. & Dabbish, L. 2008. Designing games with a purpose. Commun. ACM 51, 8 (Aug. 2008), 58--67. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Von Ahn, L. 2006. Games with a purpose, IEEE Computer Magazine 39, 6 (June 2006), 92--94. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Von Ahn, L. & Dabbish, L. 2004. Labeling images with a computer game. Proc. CHI '04, 319--326. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Von Ahn, L., Kedia, M., & Blum, M. 2006. Verbosity: a game for collecting common-sense facts. Proc. CHI '06, 75--78. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Von Ahn, L., Liu, R., & Blum, M. 2006. Peekaboom: a game for locating objects in images. Proc. CHI '06, 55--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walsh, G. & Golbeck, J. 2010. Curator: a game with a purpose for collection recommendation. Proc. CHI '10, 2079--2082. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Ackerman, M. S. 2008. Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: strategic user behavior on taskcn. Proc. EC '08, 246--255. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Guess who?: enriching the social graph through a crowdsourcing game
Recommendations
Games for Crowds: A Crowdsourcing Game Platform for the Enterprise
CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social ComputingIn this paper, we present a crowdsourcing game platform that allows users to play, create, and share simple games that harness the collective intelligence of employees within the enterprise. The platform uses the wizard design pattern to guide users ...
PhotoCity: training experts at large-scale image acquisition through a competitive game
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsLarge-scale, ground-level urban imagery has recently developed as an important element of online mapping tools such as Google's Street View. Such imagery is extremely valuable in a number of potential applications, ranging from augmented reality to 3D ...
Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web
The practice of crowdsourcing is transforming the Web and giving rise to a new field.
Comments