skip to main content
10.1145/1979742.1979491acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel

RepliCHI - CHI should be replicating and validating results more: discuss

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The replication of research findings is a cornerstone of good science. Replication confirms results, strengthens research, and makes sure progress is based on solid foundations. CHI, however, rewards novelty and is focused on new results. As a community, therefore, we do not value, facilitate, or reward replication in research, and often take the significant results of a single user study on 20 users to be true. This panel will address the issues surrounding replication in our community, and discuss: a) how much of our broad diverse discipline is 'science', b) how, if at all, we currently see replication of research in our community, c) whether we should place more emphasis on replication in some form, and d) how that should look in our community. The aim of the panel is to make a proposal to future CHI organizers (2 are on the panel) for how we should facilitate replication in the future.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

1979491.mp4

mp4

343.1 MB

References

  1. Capra, R., Marchionini, G., Oh, J.S., Stutzman, F. and Zhang, Y., Effects of structure and interaction style on distinct search tasks. In Proc. JCDL 2007, 442--451. 2007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Harman, D.K., The TREC conferences. Morgan Kaufmann Multimedia Information And Systems Series247--256. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hearst, M.A., Next generation web search: setting our sites. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin: Special Issue on Next Generation Web Search, 23(3), 38--48. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeffries, R., Miller, J.R., Wharton, C. and Uyeda, K., User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques. In Proc. CHI 1991, 119--124. 1991 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Karat, C., Campbell, R. and Fiegel, T., Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. In Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation, 397--404. 1992 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mackay, W.E., Appert, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Chapuis, O., Du, Y., Fekete, J.-D. and Guiard, Y., Touchstone: exploratory design of experiments. In Proc. CHI 2007, 1425--1434. 2007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. schraefel, m.c., Wilson, M.L., Russell, A. and Smith, D.A., mSpace: improving information access to multimedia domains with multimodal exploratory search. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 47--49. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. RepliCHI - CHI should be replicating and validating results more: discuss

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader