skip to main content
research-article

Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures

Published:01 July 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Trust plays an important role in many Information Systems (IS)-enabled situations. Most IS research employs trust as a measure of interpersonal or person-to-firm relations, such as trust in a Web vendor or a virtual team member. Although trust in other people is important, this article suggests that trust in the Information Technology (IT) itself also plays a role in shaping IT-related beliefs and behavior. To advance trust and technology research, this article presents a set of trust in technology construct definitions and measures. We also empirically examine these construct measures using tests of convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity. This study contributes to the literature by providing: (a) a framework that differentiates trust in technology from trust in people, (b) a theory-based set of definitions necessary for investigating different kinds of trust in technology, and (c) validated trust in technology measures useful to research and practice.

References

  1. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103, 3, 411--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Arrow, K. J. 1974. The Limits of Organization. Norton, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Balusek, S. and Sircar, S. 1998. The network computer concept. Inf. Syst. Manag. 15, 1, 48--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Barber, B. 1983. The Logic and Limits of Trust. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 3, 588--606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Benamati J., Fuller, M. A., Serva, M. A., and Baroudi, J. 2010. Clarifying the integration of trust and TAM in e-commerce environments: Implications for systems design and management. IEEE Trans. Engin. Manag. 57, 3, 380--393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Berscheid, E. 1993. Emotion. In Close Relationships, H. H. Kelley et al. Eds., W. H. Freeman, New York, 110--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacherjee, A. 2002. Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19, 1, 211--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bonoma, T. V. 1976. Conflict, cooperation, and trust in three power systems. Behav. Sci. 21, 6, 499--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Burton-Jones, A. and Straub, D. W. 2006. Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inf. Syst. Res. 17, 3, 228--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Clarke, R. 1999. Internet privacy concerns confirm the case for intervention. Comm. ACM 42, 2, 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chow, S. and Holden, R. 1997. Toward an understanding of loyalty: The moderating role of trust. J. Manag. Issues 9, 3, 275--298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Corbitt, B. J., Thanasankit, T., and Yi, H. 2003. Trust and e-commerce: A study of consumer perceptions. Electron. Commerce Res. Appl. 2, 203--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13, 3, 319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., and Mullen, M. R. 1998. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. The Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 3, 601--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Earley, P. C. 1986. Trust, perceived importance of praise and criticism, and work performance: An examination of feedback in the United States and England. J. Manag. 12, 457--473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Edwards, J. R. 2001. Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organiz. Res. Methods 4, 2, 144--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Elangovan, A. R. and Xie, J. L. 1999. Effects of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics. J. Organiz. Behav. 20, 3, 359--373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Market. Res. 18, 39--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Howe, D. C. 2000. Trust online. Comm. ACM 43, 12, 34--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. The Free Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., and Boudreau, M. 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. AIS 7, 7, 1--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. 2003. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. 27, 1, 51--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Giffin, K. 1967. The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychol. Bull. 68, 2, 104--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Golembiewski, R. T. and Mcconkie, M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes, G. L. Cooper, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, London, 131--185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equa. Model. 6, 1, 1--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Leidner, D. E. 1998. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organiz. Sci. 10, 6, 791--815. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kim, D. 2008. Self-Perception based versus transference-based trust determinants in computer-mediated transactions: A cross-cultural comparison study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 4, 13--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kim, G., Shin, B. S., and Lee, H. G. 2009. Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Inf. Syst. J. 19, 3, 283--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Kim, K. K. and Prabhakar, B. 2004. Initial trust and the adoption of B2C e-commerce: The case of internet banking. The Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 35, 2, 50--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Komiak, S. Y. X. and Benbasat, I. 2006. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quart. 30, 4, 941--960. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Koufaris, M. and Hampton-Sosa, W. 2004. The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Inf. Manag. 41, 3, 377--397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., and Mobley, W. H. 1998. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 4, 741--755.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Lee, M. K. O. and Turban, E. 2001. A trust model for consumer internet shopping. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 6, 1, 75--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Lewicki, R. J. and Bunker, B. B. 1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, R. Kramer and T. Tyler Eds., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 114--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, D., Browne, G. J., and Wetherbe, J. C. 2006. Why do internet users stick with a specific web site? A relationship perspective. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 10, 4, 105--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Lim, K. H., Choon, L. S., Lee, M. K. O., and Benbasat, I. 2006. Do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study of two trust-building strategies. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23, 2, 233--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Lippert, S. K. 2007. Assessing post-adoption utilisation of information technology within a supply chain management context. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 7, 1, 36--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. John Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 709--734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Mcknight, D. H. 2005. Trust in information technology. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, Management Information Systems, G. B. Davis, Ed., Blackwell, Malden, MA, Vol. 7, 329--331.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Mcknight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. 1996. The meanings of trust. University of Minnesota MIS Research Center Working Paper series, WP 96--04. http://misrc.umn.edu/wpaper/WorkingPapers/9604.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Mcknight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. 2001. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 6, 2, 35--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Mcknight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. 2002. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 3, 334--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Mcknight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., and Chervany, N. L. 1998. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 3, 473--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Nambisan, S., Agarwal, R., and Tanniru, M. 1999. Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quart. 23, 3, 365--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Noar, S. 2003. The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Struct. Equa. Model. 10, 4, 622--647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Orlikowski, W. J. and Iacono, C. S. 2001. Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 2, 121--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Paul, D. L. and Mcdaniel, R. R. 2002. A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quart. 28, 2, 183--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Pavlou, P. A. 2003. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 7, 3, 101--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Pavlou, P. A. and Gefen, D. 2004. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inf. Syst. Res. 15, 1, 37--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Pennington, R., Wilcox, H. D., and Grover, V. 2003. The role of system trust in business-to-comsumer transactions. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20, 3, 197--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 5, 879--903.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Polites, G. L., Roberts, N., and Thatcher, J. B. Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: A review and guidelines for their use. Euro. J. Inf. Syst. (To appear).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., and Zanna, M. P. 1985. Trust in close relationships. J. Personal. Social Psychol. 49, 1, 95--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Riker, W. H. 1971. The nature of trust. In Perspectives on Social Power, J. T. Tedeschi, Ed., Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, 63--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Rotter, J. B. 1971. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Amer. Psychol. 26, 5, 443--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 3, 393--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Sen, R., King, R. C., and Shaw, M. J. 2006. Buyers' choice of online search strategy and its managerial implications. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23, 1, 211--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Serva, M. A., Fuller, M. A., and Benamati, J. 2005. Trustworthiness in B2C e-commerce: Empirical test of alternative models. DataB. Adv. Inf. Syst. 36, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Stewart, K. J. 2003. Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organiz. Sci. 14, 1, 5--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Suh, B. and Han, I. 2003. The impact of customer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 7, 3, 135--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Sun, H. 2010. Sellers' trust and continued use of online marketplaces. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 11, 4, 182--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics 3rd Ed., Harper Collins, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Thatcher, J. B. and Perrewe, P. L. 2002. An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quart. 26, 4, 381--396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Thatcher, J. B., Mcknight, D. H., Baker, E. W., Arsal, R., and Roberts, N. 2011. The role of trust in postadoption exploration: An empirical investigation of knowledge management systems. IEEE Trans. Engin. Manag. 58, 1, 56--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Thatcher, J. B., Zimmer, J. C., Gundlach, M. J., and Mcknight, D. H. 2008. Internal and external dimensions of computer self-efficacy: An empirical examination. IEEE Trans. Engin. Manag. 55, 4, 628--644.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Van Der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., and Creemers, M. 2003. Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. Euro. J. Inf. Syst. 12, 41--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Van Slyke, C., Belanger, F., and Comunale, C. L. 2004. Factors influencing the adoption of web-based shopping: The impact of trust. DataB. Adv. Inf. Syst. 35, 2, 32--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Vance, A., Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., and Straub, D. 2008. Examining trust in information technology artifacts: The effects of system quality and culture. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 4, 73--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Wang, W. and Benbasat, I. 2005. Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 6, 3, 72--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Williams, F. 1968. Reasoning with Statistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Williamson, O. E. 1993. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J. Law Econ. 34, 453--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Zins, A. H. 2001. Relative attitudes and commitment in customer loyalty models. Int. J. Serv. Industry Manag. 12, 3, 269--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
      ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 2, Issue 2
      June 2011
      111 pages
      ISSN:2158-656X
      EISSN:2158-6578
      DOI:10.1145/1985347
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 July 2011
      • Revised: 1 April 2011
      • Accepted: 1 April 2011
      • Received: 1 September 2010
      Published in tmis Volume 2, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader