Abstract
Trust plays an important role in many Information Systems (IS)-enabled situations. Most IS research employs trust as a measure of interpersonal or person-to-firm relations, such as trust in a Web vendor or a virtual team member. Although trust in other people is important, this article suggests that trust in the Information Technology (IT) itself also plays a role in shaping IT-related beliefs and behavior. To advance trust and technology research, this article presents a set of trust in technology construct definitions and measures. We also empirically examine these construct measures using tests of convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity. This study contributes to the literature by providing: (a) a framework that differentiates trust in technology from trust in people, (b) a theory-based set of definitions necessary for investigating different kinds of trust in technology, and (c) validated trust in technology measures useful to research and practice.
- Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103, 3, 411--423.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arrow, K. J. 1974. The Limits of Organization. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
- Balusek, S. and Sircar, S. 1998. The network computer concept. Inf. Syst. Manag. 15, 1, 48--57.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barber, B. 1983. The Logic and Limits of Trust. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
- Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 3, 588--606.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benamati J., Fuller, M. A., Serva, M. A., and Baroudi, J. 2010. Clarifying the integration of trust and TAM in e-commerce environments: Implications for systems design and management. IEEE Trans. Engin. Manag. 57, 3, 380--393.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Berscheid, E. 1993. Emotion. In Close Relationships, H. H. Kelley et al. Eds., W. H. Freeman, New York, 110--168.Google Scholar
- Bhattacherjee, A. 2002. Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19, 1, 211--241. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bonoma, T. V. 1976. Conflict, cooperation, and trust in three power systems. Behav. Sci. 21, 6, 499--514.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burton-Jones, A. and Straub, D. W. 2006. Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inf. Syst. Res. 17, 3, 228--246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clarke, R. 1999. Internet privacy concerns confirm the case for intervention. Comm. ACM 42, 2, 60--67. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chow, S. and Holden, R. 1997. Toward an understanding of loyalty: The moderating role of trust. J. Manag. Issues 9, 3, 275--298.Google Scholar
- Corbitt, B. J., Thanasankit, T., and Yi, H. 2003. Trust and e-commerce: A study of consumer perceptions. Electron. Commerce Res. Appl. 2, 203--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13, 3, 319--340.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., and Mullen, M. R. 1998. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. The Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 3, 601--620.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Earley, P. C. 1986. Trust, perceived importance of praise and criticism, and work performance: An examination of feedback in the United States and England. J. Manag. 12, 457--473.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edwards, J. R. 2001. Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organiz. Res. Methods 4, 2, 144--192.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elangovan, A. R. and Xie, J. L. 1999. Effects of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics. J. Organiz. Behav. 20, 3, 359--373.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Market. Res. 18, 39--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Howe, D. C. 2000. Trust online. Comm. ACM 43, 12, 34--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., and Boudreau, M. 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. AIS 7, 7, 1--78.Google Scholar
- Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. 2003. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. 27, 1, 51--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giffin, K. 1967. The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychol. Bull. 68, 2, 104--120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Golembiewski, R. T. and Mcconkie, M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes, G. L. Cooper, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, London, 131--185.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equa. Model. 6, 1, 1--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Leidner, D. E. 1998. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organiz. Sci. 10, 6, 791--815. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, D. 2008. Self-Perception based versus transference-based trust determinants in computer-mediated transactions: A cross-cultural comparison study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 4, 13--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, G., Shin, B. S., and Lee, H. G. 2009. Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Inf. Syst. J. 19, 3, 283--311.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kim, K. K. and Prabhakar, B. 2004. Initial trust and the adoption of B2C e-commerce: The case of internet banking. The Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 35, 2, 50--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Komiak, S. Y. X. and Benbasat, I. 2006. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quart. 30, 4, 941--960. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koufaris, M. and Hampton-Sosa, W. 2004. The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Inf. Manag. 41, 3, 377--397. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., and Mobley, W. H. 1998. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 4, 741--755.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, M. K. O. and Turban, E. 2001. A trust model for consumer internet shopping. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 6, 1, 75--91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lewicki, R. J. and Bunker, B. B. 1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, R. Kramer and T. Tyler Eds., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 114--139.Google Scholar
- Li, D., Browne, G. J., and Wetherbe, J. C. 2006. Why do internet users stick with a specific web site? A relationship perspective. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 10, 4, 105--141. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lim, K. H., Choon, L. S., Lee, M. K. O., and Benbasat, I. 2006. Do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study of two trust-building strategies. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23, 2, 233--266. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lippert, S. K. 2007. Assessing post-adoption utilisation of information technology within a supply chain management context. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 7, 1, 36--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 709--734.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mcknight, D. H. 2005. Trust in information technology. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, Management Information Systems, G. B. Davis, Ed., Blackwell, Malden, MA, Vol. 7, 329--331.Google Scholar
- Mcknight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. 1996. The meanings of trust. University of Minnesota MIS Research Center Working Paper series, WP 96--04. http://misrc.umn.edu/wpaper/WorkingPapers/9604.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Mcknight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. 2001. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 6, 2, 35--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mcknight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. 2002. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 3, 334--359. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mcknight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., and Chervany, N. L. 1998. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 3, 473--490.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nambisan, S., Agarwal, R., and Tanniru, M. 1999. Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quart. 23, 3, 365--395. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Noar, S. 2003. The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Struct. Equa. Model. 10, 4, 622--647.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Orlikowski, W. J. and Iacono, C. S. 2001. Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 2, 121--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul, D. L. and Mcdaniel, R. R. 2002. A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quart. 28, 2, 183--227. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pavlou, P. A. 2003. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 7, 3, 101--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pavlou, P. A. and Gefen, D. 2004. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inf. Syst. Res. 15, 1, 37--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pennington, R., Wilcox, H. D., and Grover, V. 2003. The role of system trust in business-to-comsumer transactions. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20, 3, 197--226. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 5, 879--903.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Polites, G. L., Roberts, N., and Thatcher, J. B. Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: A review and guidelines for their use. Euro. J. Inf. Syst. (To appear).Google Scholar
- Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., and Zanna, M. P. 1985. Trust in close relationships. J. Personal. Social Psychol. 49, 1, 95--112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Riker, W. H. 1971. The nature of trust. In Perspectives on Social Power, J. T. Tedeschi, Ed., Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, 63--81.Google Scholar
- Rotter, J. B. 1971. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Amer. Psychol. 26, 5, 443--452.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 3, 393--404.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sen, R., King, R. C., and Shaw, M. J. 2006. Buyers' choice of online search strategy and its managerial implications. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23, 1, 211--238. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Serva, M. A., Fuller, M. A., and Benamati, J. 2005. Trustworthiness in B2C e-commerce: Empirical test of alternative models. DataB. Adv. Inf. Syst. 36, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stewart, K. J. 2003. Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organiz. Sci. 14, 1, 5--17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suh, B. and Han, I. 2003. The impact of customer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 7, 3, 135--161. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sun, H. 2010. Sellers' trust and continued use of online marketplaces. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 11, 4, 182--211.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics 3rd Ed., Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
- Thatcher, J. B. and Perrewe, P. L. 2002. An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quart. 26, 4, 381--396. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thatcher, J. B., Mcknight, D. H., Baker, E. W., Arsal, R., and Roberts, N. 2011. The role of trust in postadoption exploration: An empirical investigation of knowledge management systems. IEEE Trans. Engin. Manag. 58, 1, 56--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thatcher, J. B., Zimmer, J. C., Gundlach, M. J., and Mcknight, D. H. 2008. Internal and external dimensions of computer self-efficacy: An empirical examination. IEEE Trans. Engin. Manag. 55, 4, 628--644.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van Der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., and Creemers, M. 2003. Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. Euro. J. Inf. Syst. 12, 41--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Slyke, C., Belanger, F., and Comunale, C. L. 2004. Factors influencing the adoption of web-based shopping: The impact of trust. DataB. Adv. Inf. Syst. 35, 2, 32--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vance, A., Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., and Straub, D. 2008. Examining trust in information technology artifacts: The effects of system quality and culture. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 4, 73--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, W. and Benbasat, I. 2005. Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 6, 3, 72--101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Williams, F. 1968. Reasoning with Statistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
- Williamson, O. E. 1993. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J. Law Econ. 34, 453--502.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zins, A. H. 2001. Relative attitudes and commitment in customer loyalty models. Int. J. Serv. Industry Manag. 12, 3, 269--294.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures
Recommendations
Trust Factors Affecting the Adoption of E-Government for Civic Engagement
Electronic GovernmentAbstractThis study aims to investigate trust factors affecting the use and adoption of e-government services, which lead to civic engagement. The constructs identified in this study are related to the theories of technology adoption in addition to trust ...
Modelling trust in human-like technologies
IndiaHCI '18: Proceedings of the 9th Indian Conference on Human-Computer InteractionTrust is an important decision-making construct helping users to adopt and continually use a system. Despite its importance, past research has mainly focused on studying and researching it in technology mediated interactions. As nature of technical ...
The Role of Trust and Technology Acceptance ModelTAM on Customer Acceptance of Mobile Banking: An Integrated Model to Improve Mobile Banking in Banking Sector-A Conceptual Paper
This paper studies the need to integrate trust and Technology acceptance model TAM to understand the behaviour intention of the customer to use mobile banking. The present study focuses through literature review on trust related antecedents and ...
Comments