ABSTRACT
We have constructed a prototype Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) standards-based Arctic Climatology Sensor Network Prototype (ACSNP) in response to recent developments in sensor technology and Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) wireless communications in Barrow, Alaska for the National Science Foundation (NSF). The OGC standards enable increased, interoperability, scalability, and extensibility for geospatial information at reduced cost. Our approach for the prototype is to integrate established technologies to create near-real-time geographic information networks (GINs). We linked a variety of meteorological and image sensors to a wide area wireless network in Barrow, Alaska. The network is a TCP/IP-based 700 Mhz WipLL network consisting of a 16 kilometer diameter local cloud as well as more distant fixed and mobile Iridium Open Port Units, that allow for global connectivity, at other remote research stations and on polar class ice breakers. Sensors linked to these wireless networks transfer their data to the Department of Energy (DOE) building in Barrow. The building houses two automatically populated mirrored File Transfer Protocol (FTP) servers running Microsoft Server 2003 within a virtualized environment. The data are automatically harvested from the remote site over redundant 4 X T-1 satellite links to the central data center in Cincinnati, Ohio where it is formatted to comply with the OGC database initiatives to create an OGC-compliant geodatabase within Microsoft SQL Server 2008. The final web publication is the result of a three part system; geodatabases, web services and web applications. We use ESRI's ArcGIS Server technology for retrieval and publication utilizing ESRI's compliance with OGC web services. These web services may then be embedded within OGC compliant clients, such as ESRI's ArcGIS Desktop and Google Earth for analysis and web applications. The Arctic Climatology Sensor Network Prototype is accessible at OpenSensorMap.com.
- Botts, M., Percivall, G., Reed, C. and Davidson, J. 2006. OGC White Paper -- OGC Sensor Web Enablement: Overview and High Level Architecture, OGC 06-046r2, Wayland, MA, USA: OGC.Google Scholar
- Bröring, A., Echterhoff, J., Jirka, S., Simonis, I., Everding, T., Stasch, C., Liang, S. and Lemmens, R. 2011. New Generation Sensor Web Enablement. Sensors 11, 3, 2652--2699.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bröring, A., Foerster, T., Jirka, S. and Priess, C. 2010a. Sensor bus: an intermediary layer for linking geosensors and the sensor web. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research\&\#38; Application (COM.Geo '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 21-30 DOI=10.1145/1823854.1823870 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1823854.1823870 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bröring, A., Below, S. and Foerster, T. 2010b. Declarative Sensor Interface Descriptors for the Sensor Web. WebMGS 2010: 1st International Workshop on Pervasive Web Mapping, Geoprocessing and Services, August 2010, Como, Italy 26--32.Google Scholar
- Chen, N., Di, L., Yu, G., Gong, J., and Wei, Y. 2009. Use of ebRIM-based CSW with sensor observation services for registry and discovery of remote-sensing observations. Computers & Geosciences 35, 2, 360--372. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Conover, H., Berthiau, G., Botts, M., Goodman, M. H., Li, X., Lu, Y., Maskey, M., Regner, K., and Zavodsky, B. 2010. Using sensor web protocols for environmental data acquisition and management. Ecological Informatics 5, 1, 32--41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Craglia, M., Goodchild, M., Annoni, A., Camara, G., Gould, M., Kuhn, W., Mark, D., Masser, I., Maguire, D., Liang, S. and Parsons, E. 2008. Next-Generation Digital Earth. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 3, 146--167.Google Scholar
- Delin, K., Jackson, S., Johnson, D., Burleigh. S., Woodrow, R., McAuley, J., Dohm, J., Ip, F., Ferré, T., Rucker, D. and Baker, V. 2005. Environmental studies with the sensor web: Principles and practice. Sensors 5, 1--2, 103--117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Delin, K. 2002. The Sensor Web: A macro-instrument for coordinated sensing. Sensors 2, 7, 270--285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dragovic, B. 2003. Xen and the art of virtualization. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review 37, 5, 164--177. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ESRI, 2010. ArcSDE Technology. http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcsde/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Goodchild, M. F. 2007a. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 4, 211--221.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goodchild, M. F. 2007b. Citizens as Voluntary Sensors: Spatial Data Infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 2, 24--32.Google Scholar
- Herring, J. 2006. OGC Standard--OpenGIS Implementation Specification for Geographic information - Simple feature access - Part 2: SQL option, OGC 06-104r3, Wayland, MA, USA: OGC.Google Scholar
- Ivenso, C., Rettig, A., and Beck, R. A. 2011. An OGC Based Geographic Information Network Methodology for Monitoring Microcystis Bloom Events in Maumee Bay, Lake Erie, American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, Poster session.Google Scholar
- Jabeur, N., McCarthy, J., Xing, X. and Graniero, P. 2009. A knowledge-oriented meta-framework for integrating sensor network infrastructures. Computers & Geosciences 35, 4, Geoscience Knowledge Representation in Cyberinfrastructure 809--819. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jirka, S., Broring, A., Stasch, C. 2009. Applying OGC SensorWeb Enablement to Risk Monitoring and Disaster Management. In GSDI 11 World Conference, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Kiehle, C. 2006. Business logic for geoprocessing of distributed geodata. Computers and Geosciences 32, 10, 1746--1757. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kotamäki, N., Thessler, S., Koskiaho, J., Hannukkala, A. O., Huitu, H., Huttula, T., Haventon, J. and Järvenpää, M. 2009. Wireless in-situ sensor network for agriculture and water monitoring on a river basin scale in Southern Finland: evaluation from a data users perspective. Sensors 4, 9, 2862--2883.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liang, S., Croitoru, A. and Tao, C. 2005. A distributed geospatial infrastructure for Sensor Web. Computers & Geosciences 31, 2, 221--231. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nath, S., Liu, J. and Zhao, F. 2007. SensorMap for Wide-Area Sensor Webs. Computer 40, 7, 90--93. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Net Applications, 2010. Operating System Market Share. http://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8Google Scholar
- Nittel, S., Labrinidis, A. and Stefanidis, A. 2008. Introduction to Advances in Geosensor Networks, In GeoSensor Networks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rettig, A. 2010. An Open Geospatial Consortium Standards-based Arctic Climatology Sensor Network Prototype. Master's Thesis. Department of Geography, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
- Shin, J., Kumar, R., Mohapatra, D., Ramachandran, U., and Ammar, M. 2007. ASAP: a camera sensor network for situation awareness. In Proceedings of the 11th international Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (Guadeloupe, French West Indies, December 17--20, 2007). E. Tovar, P. Tsigas, and H. Fouchal, Eds. Lecture Notes In Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. 31--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Winter, S. and Dupkez, S. 2008. Queries for historic events in geosensor networks. Journal of Location Based Services 2, 3, 177--193. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yick, J., Mukherjee, B. and Ghosal, D. 2008. Wireless sensor network survey. Computer Networks 52, 12, 2292--2330. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- An open geospatial consortium standards-based arctic climatology sensor network prototype
Recommendations
Simulating Future Changes in Arctic and Subarctic Vegetation
The Arctic is a sensitive system undergoing dramatic changes related to recent warming trends. Vegetation dynamics—increases in the quantity of green vegetation and a northward migration of trees into the arctic tundra—are a component of this change. ...
GeoTempo: a modular, end-to-end OGC sensor web
COM.Geo '11: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research & ApplicationsEnvironmental information is valuable for monitoring and remediation efforts only if the location and time of acquisition are recorded in parallel with other parameters such as temperature, pH, pCO2 etc. Similarly, environmental information must be ...
Recent advancement in sensor web architectures and applications
eConf '09: Proceedings of the First Kuwait Conference on e-Services and e-SystemsWireless Sensor Networks (WSN) consist of thousands of spatially distributed, low cost, low energy, unattended, and resource constrained sensor nodes for environmental monitoring, pollution detections, battle field surveillance etc. A Sensor Web (SW) is ...
Comments