skip to main content
10.1145/1999320.1999332acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagescom-geoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An open geospatial consortium standards-based arctic climatology sensor network prototype

Published:23 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We have constructed a prototype Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) standards-based Arctic Climatology Sensor Network Prototype (ACSNP) in response to recent developments in sensor technology and Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) wireless communications in Barrow, Alaska for the National Science Foundation (NSF). The OGC standards enable increased, interoperability, scalability, and extensibility for geospatial information at reduced cost. Our approach for the prototype is to integrate established technologies to create near-real-time geographic information networks (GINs). We linked a variety of meteorological and image sensors to a wide area wireless network in Barrow, Alaska. The network is a TCP/IP-based 700 Mhz WipLL network consisting of a 16 kilometer diameter local cloud as well as more distant fixed and mobile Iridium Open Port Units, that allow for global connectivity, at other remote research stations and on polar class ice breakers. Sensors linked to these wireless networks transfer their data to the Department of Energy (DOE) building in Barrow. The building houses two automatically populated mirrored File Transfer Protocol (FTP) servers running Microsoft Server 2003 within a virtualized environment. The data are automatically harvested from the remote site over redundant 4 X T-1 satellite links to the central data center in Cincinnati, Ohio where it is formatted to comply with the OGC database initiatives to create an OGC-compliant geodatabase within Microsoft SQL Server 2008. The final web publication is the result of a three part system; geodatabases, web services and web applications. We use ESRI's ArcGIS Server technology for retrieval and publication utilizing ESRI's compliance with OGC web services. These web services may then be embedded within OGC compliant clients, such as ESRI's ArcGIS Desktop and Google Earth for analysis and web applications. The Arctic Climatology Sensor Network Prototype is accessible at OpenSensorMap.com.

References

  1. Botts, M., Percivall, G., Reed, C. and Davidson, J. 2006. OGC White Paper -- OGC Sensor Web Enablement: Overview and High Level Architecture, OGC 06-046r2, Wayland, MA, USA: OGC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bröring, A., Echterhoff, J., Jirka, S., Simonis, I., Everding, T., Stasch, C., Liang, S. and Lemmens, R. 2011. New Generation Sensor Web Enablement. Sensors 11, 3, 2652--2699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bröring, A., Foerster, T., Jirka, S. and Priess, C. 2010a. Sensor bus: an intermediary layer for linking geosensors and the sensor web. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research\&\#38; Application (COM.Geo '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 21-30 DOI=10.1145/1823854.1823870 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1823854.1823870 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bröring, A., Below, S. and Foerster, T. 2010b. Declarative Sensor Interface Descriptors for the Sensor Web. WebMGS 2010: 1st International Workshop on Pervasive Web Mapping, Geoprocessing and Services, August 2010, Como, Italy 26--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, N., Di, L., Yu, G., Gong, J., and Wei, Y. 2009. Use of ebRIM-based CSW with sensor observation services for registry and discovery of remote-sensing observations. Computers & Geosciences 35, 2, 360--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Conover, H., Berthiau, G., Botts, M., Goodman, M. H., Li, X., Lu, Y., Maskey, M., Regner, K., and Zavodsky, B. 2010. Using sensor web protocols for environmental data acquisition and management. Ecological Informatics 5, 1, 32--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Craglia, M., Goodchild, M., Annoni, A., Camara, G., Gould, M., Kuhn, W., Mark, D., Masser, I., Maguire, D., Liang, S. and Parsons, E. 2008. Next-Generation Digital Earth. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 3, 146--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Delin, K., Jackson, S., Johnson, D., Burleigh. S., Woodrow, R., McAuley, J., Dohm, J., Ip, F., Ferré, T., Rucker, D. and Baker, V. 2005. Environmental studies with the sensor web: Principles and practice. Sensors 5, 1--2, 103--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Delin, K. 2002. The Sensor Web: A macro-instrument for coordinated sensing. Sensors 2, 7, 270--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dragovic, B. 2003. Xen and the art of virtualization. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review 37, 5, 164--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. ESRI, 2010. ArcSDE Technology. http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcsde/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodchild, M. F. 2007a. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 4, 211--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Goodchild, M. F. 2007b. Citizens as Voluntary Sensors: Spatial Data Infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 2, 24--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Herring, J. 2006. OGC Standard--OpenGIS Implementation Specification for Geographic information - Simple feature access - Part 2: SQL option, OGC 06-104r3, Wayland, MA, USA: OGC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ivenso, C., Rettig, A., and Beck, R. A. 2011. An OGC Based Geographic Information Network Methodology for Monitoring Microcystis Bloom Events in Maumee Bay, Lake Erie, American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, Poster session.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jabeur, N., McCarthy, J., Xing, X. and Graniero, P. 2009. A knowledge-oriented meta-framework for integrating sensor network infrastructures. Computers & Geosciences 35, 4, Geoscience Knowledge Representation in Cyberinfrastructure 809--819. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jirka, S., Broring, A., Stasch, C. 2009. Applying OGC SensorWeb Enablement to Risk Monitoring and Disaster Management. In GSDI 11 World Conference, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kiehle, C. 2006. Business logic for geoprocessing of distributed geodata. Computers and Geosciences 32, 10, 1746--1757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kotamäki, N., Thessler, S., Koskiaho, J., Hannukkala, A. O., Huitu, H., Huttula, T., Haventon, J. and Järvenpää, M. 2009. Wireless in-situ sensor network for agriculture and water monitoring on a river basin scale in Southern Finland: evaluation from a data users perspective. Sensors 4, 9, 2862--2883.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Liang, S., Croitoru, A. and Tao, C. 2005. A distributed geospatial infrastructure for Sensor Web. Computers & Geosciences 31, 2, 221--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nath, S., Liu, J. and Zhao, F. 2007. SensorMap for Wide-Area Sensor Webs. Computer 40, 7, 90--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Net Applications, 2010. Operating System Market Share. http://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nittel, S., Labrinidis, A. and Stefanidis, A. 2008. Introduction to Advances in Geosensor Networks, In GeoSensor Networks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rettig, A. 2010. An Open Geospatial Consortium Standards-based Arctic Climatology Sensor Network Prototype. Master's Thesis. Department of Geography, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Shin, J., Kumar, R., Mohapatra, D., Ramachandran, U., and Ammar, M. 2007. ASAP: a camera sensor network for situation awareness. In Proceedings of the 11th international Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (Guadeloupe, French West Indies, December 17--20, 2007). E. Tovar, P. Tsigas, and H. Fouchal, Eds. Lecture Notes In Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. 31--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Winter, S. and Dupkez, S. 2008. Queries for historic events in geosensor networks. Journal of Location Based Services 2, 3, 177--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Yick, J., Mukherjee, B. and Ghosal, D. 2008. Wireless sensor network survey. Computer Networks 52, 12, 2292--2330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An open geospatial consortium standards-based arctic climatology sensor network prototype

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        COM.Geo '11: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research & Applications
        May 2011
        292 pages
        ISBN:9781450306812
        DOI:10.1145/1999320

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 May 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader