skip to main content
10.1145/1999747.1999835acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation framework underpinning the digital divas programme

Published:27 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In Australia, as elsewhere, women's participation rates in Information Technology (IT) have been low. IT is the generic term used to refer to the many courses in the Computer Science, and Information Systems disciplines. While there have been a number of intervention programmes implemented aimed at encouraging women into IT and retaining them once there, few have included evaluations of the efficacy of the intervention. Thus little is known about the factors contributing to the success, or lack of success, of the interventions, or of the medium and longer term impacts for the participants. In this paper we briefly describe an intervention programme implemented with girls in the high school years. We present an evaluation framework providing a detailed overview of the aims and processes involved in the evaluation of the programme. Data for the evaluation were embedded within the data gathering methods associated with the research on the intervention itself.

References

  1. DEST: Department Of Education Science and Training. (2002). Australian selected higher education statistics, Table 2: All students with user specified field of study by gender, 1989 to 2000. Commonwealth of Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wasburn, M. and S. Miller (2006). Still a Chilly Climate for Women Students in Technology: A Case Study. Women, Gender, and Technology. M. F. Fox, D. G. Johnson and S. V. Rosser, Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois: 60--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Suriya, M. and A. Craig (2003). Gender Issues in the Career Development of IT Professionals: A Global Perspective. AusWIT 2003 - Participation, Progress and Potential, Hobart, Australia, University of Tasmania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lang, C. (2007). Twenty-first Century Australian Women and IT: Exercising the power of choice. Computer Science Education, 17(3): 215--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lyon, A. (2003). Broadening Pathways for Young Women through VET: A report to the Victorian Office of Training and Tertiary Education Collingwood, Equity Research Centre, State of Victoria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Teague, J. (1999). Perceptions and misperceptions of computing careers. Geelong, Deakin University, School of Management Information Systems, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. von Hellens, L., Beekhuyzen, J., and S. Neilsen (2005). Thought and Action: The WinIT Perspective Strategies for Increasing Female Participation in IT. Proceedings of Women, Work and IT, Contemporary perspectives on the reproduction of gender inequality in employment, School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Darke, K., Clewell B., and R. Sevo (2002). Meeting the Challenge: The impact of the National Science Foundation's Program for women and girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 8: 285--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Parker, L. (2004). Gender and Technology in the Information Society: Networking to Influence Information and Communications Technology in Education. In GIST - Gender Perspectives Opening Diversity for Information Society Technology, Bremen, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig, A. (2010). Attracting women to computing: A framework for evaluating intervention programmes Saarbrücken, Germany, VDM Verlag Dr Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lang, C., Craig, A., Fisher, J., and H. Forgasz (2010). Creating digital divas-scaffolding perception change through secondary school and university alliances. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey, ACM:38--42 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rossi, P., Lipsey, M. and H. Freeman (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. California, Sage Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory driven evaluations: A comprehensive perspective. Newbury Park, California: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rossi, P., Freeman, H. and M. Lipsey (1999). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. California, Sage Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Owen, J. and P. Rogers (1999). Program Evaluation: forms and approaches. Sydney, Allen & Unwin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Craig, A. Fisher, J. and Dawson, L (2011) Women in ICT: Guidelines for evaluating intervention programmes. Proceedings of The 19th European Conference on Information Systems - ICT and Sustainable Service Development (ECIS 2011) Helsinki, Finland. (in press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation framework underpinning the digital divas programme

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ITiCSE '11: Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
          June 2011
          418 pages
          ISBN:9781450306973
          DOI:10.1145/1999747

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 June 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

          Upcoming Conference

          ITiCSE 2024

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader