skip to main content
10.1145/2001576.2001708acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Critical factors in the performance of novelty search

Published:12 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Novelty search is a recently proposed method for evolutionary computation designed to avoid the problem of deception, in which the fitness function guides the search process away from global optima. Novelty search replaces fitness-based selection with novelty-based selection, where novelty is measured by comparing an individual's behavior to that of the current population and an archive of past novel individuals. Though there is substantial evidence that novelty search can overcome the problem of deception, the critical factors in its performance remain poorly understood. This paper helps to bridge this gap by analyzing how the behavior function, which maps each genotype to a behavior, affects performance. We propose the notion of descendant fitness probability (DFP), which describes how likely a genotype's descendants are to have a certain fitness, and formulate two hypotheses about when changes to the behavior function will improve novelty search's performance, based on the effect of those changes on behavior and DFP. Experiments in both artificial and deceptive maze domains provide substantial empirical support for these hypotheses.

References

  1. P. Darwen and X. Yao. Every niching method has its niche: Fitness sharing and implicit sharing compared. In PPSN IV, volume 1141, pages 398--407, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. A. De Jong. An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. Gomez and R. Mikkulainen. Incremental evolution of complex general behavior. In Adaptive Behavior, volume 5, pages 317--342. MIT Press, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. J. Gomez. Sustaining diversity using behavioral information distance. In GECCO-09, pages 113--120, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. R. Harik. Finding multimodal solutions using restricted tournament selection. In ICGA-95, pages 24--31, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley. Exploiting open-endedness to solve problems through the search for novelty. In ALIFE-XI, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley. Abandoning objectives evolution through the search for novelty alone. In Evolutionary Computation. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley. Efficiently evolving programs through the search for novelty. In GECCO-10, pages 837--844, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley. Revising the evolutionary computation abstraction: minimal criteria novelty search. In GECCO -10, pages 103--110, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Lynch. The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(Suppl 1):8597--8604, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. W. Mahfoud. Niching methods for genetic algorithms. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Miconi. Evolution and complexity: the double-edged sword. Artificial life, 14(3):325--344, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J.-B. Mouret and S. Doncieux. Overcoming the bootstrap problem in evolutionary robotics using behavioral diversity. In CEC-09, pages 1161--1168, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Petrowski. A clearing procedure as a niching method for genetic algorithms. In IEEE IECC, pages 798--803, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. Risi, C. Hughes, and K. Stanley. Evolving plastic neural networks with novelty search. Adaptive Behavior, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Risi, S. D. Vanderbleek, C. Hughes, and K. O. Stanley. How novelty search escapes the deceptive trap of learning to learn. In GECCO-09, pages 153--160, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. Sareni and L. Krahenbuhl. Fitness sharing and niching methods revisited. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 2(3):97--106, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. K. O. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary Computation, 10(2):99--127, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. E. Uchibe, M. Yanase, and M. Asada. Behavior generation for a mobile robot based on the adaptive fitness function. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 40:69--77(9), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. Urzelai, D. Floreano, M. Dorigo, and M. Colombetti. Incremental robot shaping. Connection Science, 10:341--360(20), 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. L. Whitley. Fundamental principles of deception in genetic search. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, pages 221--241. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. P. Wieland. Evolving neural network controllers for unstable systems. In IJCNN-91, pages 667--673, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Critical factors in the performance of novelty search

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '11: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
          July 2011
          2140 pages
          ISBN:9781450305570
          DOI:10.1145/2001576

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 July 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader