skip to main content
10.1145/2001576.2001804acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Coevolving collection plans for UAS constellations

Published:12 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Our SPARTEN (Spatially Produced Airspace Routes from Tactical Evolved Networks) tool generates coordinated mission plans for constellations of unmanned aerial vehicles by allowing the mission planner to specify the importance of each objective for each mission. Using an evolutionary algorithm-based, multi-objective optimization technique, we consider factors such as area of analysis coverage, restricted operating zones, maximum ground control station range, adverse weather effects, military terrain value, airspace collision avoidance, path linearity, named area of analysis emphasis, and sensor performance. By employing novel visualizations using geographic information systems to represent their effectiveness, we help the user "look under the hood" of the algorithms and understand the viability and effectiveness of the mission plans to identify coverage gaps and other inefficiencies. In this paper, we apply multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to the air mission planning domain, with a focus on the visualization components.

References

  1. OSD (2009). Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap, 2009--2034. Office of the Secretary of Defense.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Taylor, K., Stouch, D., & McGraw, K. (2010). UAS Constellation Routes for ISR Security Operations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tenenbaum, S., Stouch, D., McGraw, K., & Fichtl, T. "Multi-Objective Optimization to Support Mission Planning for Constellations of Unmanned Aerial Systems," Proc. SPIE Defense and Security Symposium, 696215--1--696215--12, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ablavsky, V., Stouch, D., & Snorrason, M. S. "Search Path Optimization for UAVs Using Stochastic Sampling With Abstract Pattern Descriptors," Proc. AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control, (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rosenberg, B., Richards, M., Langton, J. T., Tenenbaum, S., & Stouch, D. W. "Applications of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms to Air Operations Mission Planning," Proc. 2008 GECCO Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, 1879--1886, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Parmee, I. C. & Watson, A. H. "Preliminary Airframe Design Using Co-Evolutionary Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms," Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '99), (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., & Pratap, A. "A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II," Proc. Parallel Problem Solving From Nature VI Conference, (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Khare, V., Yao, X., & Deb, K. (2003). Performance Scaling of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. In C. Fonseca, P. Fleming, E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, & K. Deb (Eds.), Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (2632 ed.), (pp. 72). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hughes, E. J. "Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimisation: Many Once or One Many?," Proc. Evolutionary Computation, 2005. The 2005 IEEE Congress on, 222--227, (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Coevolving collection plans for UAS constellations

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            GECCO '11: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
            July 2011
            2140 pages
            ISBN:9781450305570
            DOI:10.1145/2001576

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 12 July 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

            Upcoming Conference

            GECCO '24
            Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
            July 14 - 18, 2024
            Melbourne , VIC , Australia

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader