Discovering shakers from evolving entities via cascading graph inference

ABSTRACT

In an interconnected and dynamic world, the evolution of one entity may cause a series of significant value changes for some others. For example, the currency inflation of Thailand caused the currency slump of other Asian countries, which eventually led to the financial crisis of 1997. We call such high impact entities shakers. To discover shakers, we first introduce the concept of a cascading graph to capture the causality relationships among evolving entities over some period of time, and then infer shakers from the graph. In a cascading graph, nodes represent entities and weighted links represent the causality effects. In order to find hidden shakers in such a graph, two scoring functions are proposed, each of which estimates how much the target entity can affect the values of some others. The idea is to artificially inject a significant change on the target entity, and estimate its direct and indirect influence on the others, by following an inference rule under the Markovian assumption. Both scoring functions are proven to be only dependent on the structure of a cascading graph and can be calculated in polynomial time. Experiments included three datasets in social sciences. Without directly applicable previous methods, we modified three graphical models as baselines. The two proposed scoring functions can effectively capture those high impact entities. For example, in the experiment to discover stock market shakers, the proposed models outperform the three baselines by as much as 50% in accuracy with the ground truth obtained from Yahoo!~Finance.

References

1. N. Agarwal, H. Liu, L. Tang, and P. S. Yu. Identifying the influential bloggers in a community. In WSDM, pages 207--218, 2008.
2. World bank dataset. http://data.worldbank.org/.
3. BRIC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/bric.
4. S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In WWW, pages 107--117, 1998.
5. D.J. Fenn, M.A. Porter, P.J. Mucha, M. McDonald, S.Williams, N.F. Johnson, and N.S. Jones. Dynamical clustering of exchange rates. preprint (2010) arXiv:0905.4912v2, 2010.
6. Yahoo! finance. http://finance.yahoo.com/.
7. Yahoo! finance industry ranking. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/in?s=aapl
8. industry.
9. M. Gomez-Rodriguez, J. Leskovec, and A. Krause. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. In KDD, pages 1019--1028, 2010.
10. C. W. J. Granger. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3):424--438, 1969.
11. D. Heckerman, D. Geiger, and D. M. Chickering. Learning bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data. Machine Learning, 20(3):197--243, 1995.
12. D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and É. Tardos. Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In IN ICALP, pages 1127--1138, 2005.
13. D. Kempe, J. M. Kleinberg, and É. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In KDD, pages 137--146, 2003.
14. M. Kimura, K. Saito, and R. Nakano. Extracting influential nodes for information diffusion on a social network. In AAAI, pages 1371--1376, 2007.
15. J. M. Kleinberg, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. S. Tomkins. The web as a graph: measurements, models, and methods. In COCOON, pages 1--17, 1999.
16. T. Lappas, E. Terzi, D. Gunopulos, and H. Mannila. Finding effectors in social networks. In KDD, pages 1059--1068, 2010.
17. J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. In EC, pages 228--237, 2006.
18. J. Leskovec, M. McGlohon, C. Faloutsos, N. S. Glance, and M. Hurst. Patterns of cascading behavior in large blog graphs. In SDM, pages 551--556, 2007.
19. D. Li, J. Shen, and J. Xie. Study on representation of time series based on subsection polynomial fitting. In FSKD, pages 1371--1376, 2007.
20. D. Miles and A. Scott. Macroeconomics: understanding the wealth of nations. John Wiley and Sons., 2nd edition, 2005.
21. A. Mueen and E. J. Keogh. Online discovery and maintenance of time series motifs. In KDD, pages 1089--1098, 2010.
22. A. Mueen, E. J. Keogh, Q. Zhu, S. Cash, and M. B. Westover. Exact discovery of time series motifs. In SDM, pages 473--484, 2009.
23. S. Papadimitriou, J. Sun, and C. Faloutsos. Streaming pattern discovery in multiple time-series. In VLDB, pages 697--708, 2005.
24. J. Pearl. Causal inference in statistics: an overview. Statistics Surveys, 3:96--146, 2009.
25. Country ranking in GDP. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list-of-countries-by-gdp-(nominal).
26. C. A. Ratanamahatana, J. Lin, D. Gunopulos, E. J. Keogh, M. Vlachos, and G. Das. Mining time series data. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, pages 1049--1077. 2010.
27. Market reaction on AAPL. http://www.finanzen.net/nachricht/aktien/market-snapshot-stocks-mostly-down-after-apple-goldman-results-1012909.
28. G. Shafer. Causal logic. In ECAI, pages 711--720, 1998.
29. J. Shi and J. Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 22(8):888--905, 2000.
30. Q. Smith. Causation and the logical impossibility of a divine cause. Philosophical Topics, 21(1):169--191, 1996.
31. Y. Sun, Q. Meng, Z. Chen, and Y. Zhang. Normalizing the polynomial match for the nonlinear signal in transducers. Sensors and Actuators, 125:76--83, 2005.
32. T. D. Tregarthen and L. Rittenberg. Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers, 2nd edition, 2000.
33. Ioannis Tsamardinos. Causal data mining in bioinformatics. ERCIM News, 2007(69), 2007.
34. Y. Wang, G. Cong, G. Song, and K. Xie. Community-based greedy algorithm for mining top-k influential nodes in mobile social networks. In KDD, pages 1039--1048, 2010.
35. D. Wu, Y. Ke, J. X. Yu, P. S. Yu, and L. Chen. Detecting leaders from correlated time series. In DASFAA, pages 352--367, 2010.
36. B. Yi, N. Sidiropoulos, T. Johnson, H. V. Jagadish, C. Faloutsos, and A. Biliris. Online data mining for co-evolving time sequences. In ICDE, pages 13--22, 2000.

Index Terms

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Data mining