ABSTRACT
The aim of this paper is to introduce the implementation of a Knowledge Portal as an e-learning tool to support collaboration among MSc students during the development of their project dissertations on topics within the Knowledge Management field.
The Knowledge Portal is intended to take advantage of Web 2.0 technologies to increase the level of engagement of users in learning activities, promoting active participation within a virtual community and sharing a common interest in the Knowledge Management discipline. The Knowledge Portal could also promote problem-based learning as students create content and drive utilisation of the portal itself to support their projects.
The Knowledge Portal can support the different stages of MSc projects, allowing monitoring of project tasks and achievement of milestones.
This initiative has been started at the beginning of this year (research on progress) as a web-based extension of traditional personal supervision meetings.
The generated content and members interactions can be used to measure the level of engagement with the Knowledge Portal and also to understand barriers to implementation.
The Knowledge Portal is built on CodeBeamer collaborative open source platform as an example of affordable and practical Knowledge Management instrument.
- Azmi, M. and Zairi, M. 2005. Knowledge Management: A Proposed Taxonomy. Working Paper Series Bradford Universi ty School of Management. Vol. 5, 31.Google Scholar
- Barber, K., Munive-Hernandez, J. and Keane, J. 2006. Processed-Based Knowledge Management System for Continuous Improvement. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 23, 8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Biggs, J. and Tang, C. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. The Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Bjorn-Andersen, N., Rasmussen, L. and Rasmussen, S. 2008. Web 2.0 Adoption by Danish Newspapers - Urgent Need for New Business Models? Proceedings of International Conferences on Knowledge Management and New Media Technology, Graz, Austria. Journal of Universal Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Bredl, K. 2008. Knowledge Sharing with Social Software - Wikis in Human Services. Proceedings of International Conferences on Knowledge Management and New Media Technology, Graz, Austria. Journal of Universal Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Browne, T., et al. 2008. 2008 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for Higher Eduaction in the UK. Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. 1996. The Culture of Education. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- Collison, C. and Parcell, G. 2001. Learning to Fly: Practical Lessons from One of the World's Leading Knowledge Companies. Capstone.Google Scholar
- Davenport, T. and Probst, G. 2002. Knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens Best Practices. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davenport, T. and Prusak, L. 2000. Working K nowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davenport, T., Jarvenpaa, S. and Beers, M. 1996. Improving Knowledge Work Processes. Sloan Management Review. Vol. 37, pp. 53--65.Google Scholar
- Fallows, S. and Ahmet, K. 1999. Inspiring Students: Case Studies in Motivating the Learner. Staff and Educational Development Series. Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Griesbaum, J. and Kepp, S. 2010. Facilitating Collaborative Knowlege Management and Self-Directed Learning in Higher Education with the Help of Social Software. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, Graz, Austria. Journal of Universal Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Hartley, P., Woods, A. and Pill, M. 2005. Enhancing Teaching in Higher Education: New Approaches for Improving Student Learning. Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heisig, P. 2009. Harmonisation of Knowledge Management -Comparing 160 KM Frameworks around the Globe. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 13, pp. 4--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heisig, P., Mertins, K. and Vorbeck, J. 2001. Knowledge Management: Concepts and Best Practices in Europe. Springer-Verlog. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Higher Education Funding Council for England, Joint Information Systems Committee, Higher Education Academy. 2005. HEFCE Strategy for E-Learning. Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar
- Hussain, Z., Barber, K. and Hussain, N. 2007. Role of Action Research in Generating Technical Solutions in complex Settings. Working Paper Series Bradford University School of Management. Vol. 7, 36.Google Scholar
- Hussain, Z., Wallace, J. and Hughes, J. 2006. A Case Study of the Implementation of an Ideas Handling System for a Major Multinational Chemical Company. British Academy of Management Conference: Knowledge and Learning.Google Scholar
- Ivanova, M. 2008. Knowledge Building and Competence Development in eLearning 2.0 Systems. Proceedings of International Conferences on Knowledge Management and New Media Technology, Graz, Austria. Journal of Universal Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Jacques, D. and Salmon, G. 2007. Learning in Groups: A Handbook for Face-to-Face and Online Environments. Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joint Information Systems Committee, 2010. JISC Strategy 2010--2012.Google Scholar
- Joint Information Systems Committee. 2009. Effective Practice in a Digital Age: a Guide to Technology Enhanced Learning and Teaching. HEFCE.Google Scholar
- Kircher, K., Razmerita, L. and Sudzina, F. 2009. New Forms of Interaction & Knowledge Sharing on Web 2.0. In M. Lytras, E. Damiani and P. Ordoññez de Pablos. Web 2.0, the Business Model. Springer.Google Scholar
- Lytras, M., Damiani, E. and Ordoñez de Pablos, P. 2009. Web 2.0, the Business Model. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maier, R. and Hädrich, T. 2006. Centralized Versus Peer-to-Peer Knowledge Management Systems. Knowledge and Process Management. Vol. 13, pp. 47--61.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maier, R., Hädrich, T. and Peinl, R. 2009. Enterprise Knowledge Infrastructures. Springer.Google Scholar
- Mayes, T. and De Freitas, S. 2004. Stage 2: Review of E-Learning Theories, Frameworks and Models. JISC E-Learning Models Desk Study Issue 1.Google Scholar
- McAfee, A 2006. Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review. Vol. 47, pp. 21--28.Google Scholar
- McAfee, A. 2009. Enterprise 2.0, New Collaborative Tools for your Organisation's Toughest Challenges. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- McKinsey. 2007. How Businesses are using Web 2.0: A McKinsey Global Survey. McKinsey.Google Scholar
- Mertins, K., Heisig, P. and Vorbek, J. 2003. Knowledge Management: Concepts and Best Practices. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Müller, J. and Stocker, A. 2010. Enterprise Microblogging at Siemens, Building Technologies Division: A Descript ive Case Study. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, Graz, Austria. Journal of Universal Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Munive-Hernandez, J., et al. 2004. Modelling the Strategy Management Process: an initial BPM approach. Business Process Management Journal. Vol. 10, 6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Neumeier, K. and Retzer, S. 2010. Using Codebeamer to Manage Knowledge in an IT Consulting and System Integration Company. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, Graz, Austria. Journal of Universal Computer Science.Google Scholar
- O'Dell, C. and Hubert, C. 2011. The New Edge in Knowledge, How Knowledge Management is Changing the Way We Do Business. APQC.Google Scholar
- O'Neill, K., Singh, G. and O'Donoghue, J. 2004. Implmenting Elearning Programmes for Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Information Technology Education. Vol. 3, pp. 313--323.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Probst, G., Raub, S. and Romhardt, K. 1999. Managing Knowledge: Building Blocks for Success. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Race, P. 2007. The Lecturer's Toolkit - A Practical Guide to Assessment, Learning and Teaching. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stephens, R. 2009. Empirical Analysis of Functional Web 2..0 Environments. In M. Lytras, E. Damiani and P. Ordoñez de Pablos. Web 2.0, the Business Model. Springer.Google Scholar
- Tai, L. 2008. Corporate E-Learning: an Inside View of IBM's Solutions. Oxford University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Taticchi, P., et al. 2009. Implementation of a Knowledge Management Tool within a VDO Network: Preliminary Results. WSEAS Transactions on Business and E conomics. Vol. 6, 2.Google Scholar
- Theriu, N., Maditinos, D. and Theriu, G. 2009. Knowledge Management Enabler Factors and Firm Performance: An Empirical Reserach of the Greek Medium and Large Firms. International Conference on Applied Business & Economics ICABE 2009. International Strategic Management Association ISMA.Google Scholar
- University of Bradford EDT. 2010. Postgraduate Projects Handbook. University of Bradford.Google Scholar
- Wenger, E. 2004. Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. In K. Starkey, S. Tempest and A. McKinlay. How Organizations Learn: Managing the Search for Knowledge. Thompson.Google Scholar
- Yordanova, K. and Antonova, A. 2007. Knowledge Management Systems and E-Learning Systems Overview - Common Characteristics, Differences, and Future Potential for Integration. Conference Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, Lecce, Italy. KMO.Google Scholar
- Zuber-Skerritt, O. and Perry, C. 2002. Action Research within Organisations and University Thesis Writing. The Learning Organisation. Vol. 9, 4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Implementation of a knowledge portal as an e-learning tool to support MSc projects
Recommendations
Implementation of a Mathematics Formative Assessment Online Tool Before and During Remote Learning
Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners’ and Doctoral ConsortiumAbstractASSISTments is a free online learning tool for improving students’ mathematics achievement by providing immediate feedback and hints to students, detailed information on how students performed to teachers, and instructional suggestions for ...
Scaffolding wiki-supported collaborative learning for small-group projects and whole-class collaborative knowledge building
While educators value wikis' potential, wikis may fail to support collaborative constructive learning without careful scaffolding. This article proposes literature-based instructional methods, revised based on two expert instructors' input, presents the ...
Could a mobile-assisted learning system support flipped classrooms for classical Chinese learning?
In this study, the researcher aimed to develop a mobile-assisted learning system and to investigate whether it could promote teenage learners' classical Chinese learning through the flipped classroom approach. The researcher first proposed the structure ...
Comments