skip to main content
10.1145/2037296.2037308acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschitalyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing technologies for ageing: is simplicity always a leading criterion?

Published:13 September 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we reflect on ecological criteria for designing ICT-based tools for ageing. An ethnographic research in 150 homes of older persons has been conducted in order to better understanding their relationship with technologies. Results show that elderly people seem to develop idiosyncratic representation of technology use in connection with their stage of life, their social environment, their personal needs. The concept of simplicity, so often evoked in design for ageing, need to be complemented by more complex insights on the relationship of ageing and technology use.

References

  1. Havighurst, R. J. (1963). Successful ageing. In R. William, C. Tibbits, & W. Donabue (Eds.), Processes of Ageing (Vol.1). New York: Atherton Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Atchley, R. C. (1971). Retirement and leisure participation: continuity or crisis?. The Gerontologist, 11, 1, 13--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Balthes, P. B. (1998). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. In M. Powell Lawton & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Essential papers on the psychology of aging (pp. 86--123). New York: New York University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Birren J. E., Schiae K. W. (1996) (Eds.). Handbook of the psychology of aging. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Giusti E., Murdaca F. (2008). Psicogerontologia. Interventi psicologici integrati in tarda età. Roma: Sovera.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. WHO, Active ageing. A policy framework. World Health Organization (2002). http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hofmeester, K., Dunne, A., Gaver, B., Susani, M., Pacenti, E. A modern role for the village elders. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 43--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Rich Picking*, Alexia Robinet, Vic Grout, John McGinn, Armando Roy, Simon Ellis and Denise Oram (2010). A Case Study Using a Methodological Approach to Developing User Interfaces for Elderly and Disabled People, The Computer Journal, 53(6): 842--859. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Norman, D. (2011). Living with complexity, Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CHItaly '11: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity
    September 2011
    177 pages
    ISBN:9781450308762
    DOI:10.1145/2037296

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 September 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    CHItaly '11 Paper Acceptance Rate29of59submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate109of242submissions,45%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader